Select Committee on Defence Written Evidence


Further memorandum from the Ministry of Defence

MINISTRY OF DEFENCE POLICE AND THE SERVICE POLICE

The Committee's understanding is that a peer review may take place for complex/contentious investigations. If it did take place it would normally be by another Service, but could be a Home Department Police force. Is this understanding of review procedure correct? Could you each give an example of when a peer review by another Service and by HDPF has taken place?

  The Committee is correct in their understanding that peer review may take place for complex/contentious investigations undertaken by the Service Police (SP).

  The SP conduct major investigations in accordance with ACPO endorsed policy whenever possible, as laid out in the Major Incident Room Standardised Administration Procedures (MIRSAP) and if applicable, the ACPO Murder Manual. Major Crime Review is a procedure outlined in MIRSAPs. In addition, ACPO has recommended that all undetected cases of murder or stranger rape should be formally reviewed. In consequence, when the SP investigates such offences overseas, again whenever practicable, a HDPF will be invited to conduct a major crime review of the investigation. In 2000, Lancashire Police were invited to conduct a formal review of Op KINGFISHER, a RMP SIB conducted investigation of an alleged murder in Belize. Additionally, the RMP SIB may invite external police agencies to conduct "Cold Case Reviews". In 2000, the National Crime Faculty was asked to undertake a cold case review concerning the disappearance of a young British girl in Germany in 1982. When the case was reopened (Op LOLLIPOP) the investigation was subject to formal review in 2002 by South Wales Police and again in 2003.

  It is recognised that the RAF and RN do not, as a matter of routine, have reported to them the types of major crime investigated by the RMP SIB. However, it is recognised that peer review is still an important tool and a protocol[53] exists between the respective PMs which gives them the facility to call in another SP Force. In one such case, the conduct of a RAF Police investigation[54] and the actions of a senior RAF Police officer, his staff and members of RAFP SIB were the subject of a Redress of Complaint raised by a RAF Police NCO following his investigation for alleged offences. Given the seriousness of the allegations, the complexity of the inquiry and the involvement of both a senior RAF Police officer and members of RAF Provost and Security Services (SIB), it was essential to ensure that any subsequent investigation/review of the original inquiry was as transparent and independent as possible. The case was referred to the RMP and staff from HQ RMP SIB (UK) conducted the review. The RN recognises the benefit of peer review. However, to date, such a reviewing process has not been required.

On lessons learnt from Deepcut, please clarify whether the SIB contribution to the Surrey Police investigations would be subject to Devon and Cornwall's peer review. Does the RMP expect to receive comments direct from D&C or from Surrey Police on their contribution once the peer review is completed?

  The SIB contribution to the Deepcut investigations was provided at the request of either the Surrey Police or the Coroner. The information gathered by the SIB was passed to Surrey Police and forms part of their material, which we understood might be the subject of review.

  This question is therefore a matter for the Chief Constable of Surrey Police as it would have been for him to request any review and to draw up the terms of reference for the current Devon and Cornwall Police "Quality Assurance" exercise or any other form of peer review. PM (A) has not been consulted at any stage concerning the scope or likely product of any of the reviews conducted on the Chief Constable's behalf, nor has he been asked to make a contribution.

P(MA)

The Committee understands that MDP or SP might not be the first responders to an incident. What advice, if any, is provided by MDP/SP to units on preservation of the scene? What advice, if any, is provided by MDP/SP to units on what actions to take before the arrival of police?

  In all Services the responsibility for the preservation of the scene rests with the Commanding Officer (CO), pending the arrival of the SP, MDP or HDPF. Guidance is issued to COs by way of orders and a Defence Council Instruction that have been compiled with inputs provided by the MDP/SP. This guidance includes advice on preventing/limiting access and safeguarding objects at the crime scene. The main thrust of this guidance is that apart from taking immediate action to preserve life and minimise harm to others, nothing should be touched or tampered with until the arrival of the police.

  It should be noted that most RN and RAF units have a SP complement, the strength of which will vary according to the policing needs of the unit. Accordingly, the duty SP staff will, in almost all conceivable circumstances, be the first responder, following a report of an incident.

  The Defence Police Chiefs are working with the ACPO Homicide Working Group Crime Committee to assist in the development of a HDPF/Defence Police protocol for dealing with sudden deaths that occur on military establishments in the UK.

What is the MDP/SP presence at initial training establishments?( The question relates to the query raised in the briefing, whether there would be an MDP/SP representative present at a training establishment like Deepcut or Catterick, who might be in a position to take early pro-active action if he/she observed a potential problem that required investigation. The answers need to cover, not only details of any permanent presence, but also whether their duties would make it likely that they would be able to take early action).

MDP

  MDP currently have Unit Beat Officers (single, 40hrs per week constables) deployed to Army Training Regiment (ATR) Bassingbourn, Lichfield and Harrogate, all places where young recruits are trained. We also have a UBO stationed at Pirbright, which backs onto the Deepcut site. The UBO role is demanding and they are linked into the various Agencies and Departments on each site. If a UBO was aware, or made aware of a potential problem, then they are well placed to take early action. However, MDP frequently share or are co-located with the SP for good operational reasons. There would need to be an element of trust between any recruit and the UBO and therefore it may be difficult for a recruit to actually speak out to an officer without being observed by his or her peers or other service colleagues. Nevertheless, where an incident has been reported to MDP officers, they will take the necessary action to deal with the incident at the appropriate level.

PM(N)

  As stated above, RN Service Police form part of the manning table in all major shore establishments and HM ships.

  HMS Raleigh is the Royal Navy's Phase 1 training establishment for all Royal Navy Junior Ratings. HMS Collingwood and HMS Sultan are the two principal Phase 2 training establishments; Service Police manning tables are as follows:


HMS Raleigh
HMS Collingwood
HMS Sultan

Officers
Lt (Capt)
Nil
1 x Lt
1 x Lt
Lt Cdr (Maj)
Cdr
WOMAA (WO1)
1
1
Nil
MAA's (SSgt)
1
1
RPO (Sgt)
3
1
1
LREG (Cpl)
0
3
2


  The manning levels detailed above are permanently employed in SP duties. The training divisions within Shore training establishments have the support of a Divisional System that will monitor individuals who are under training. Emphasis on Equal Opportunity Training and how to deal with incidents of Bullying and Harassment forms an integral part of phase-one training. This is a well-established policy engendered at the earliest stage of an individual's career. It is intended to provide reassurance to all personnel undergoing initial training that there is a mechanism available for them to report any concerns at the earliest stage before incidents escalate. This report may be made through their Phase 1 Instructor, through the Chaplaincy or directly to the SP. Early pro-active intervention is key to upholding the zero tolerance policy on bullying and harassment and to enable early detection of disciplinary and criminal activity.

PM(A)

  The RMP can be found in all of the major Army garrisons in England: Aldershot; Bulford/Tidworth; Colchester and Catterick. As in the case of Aldershot the RMP unit is proximate to an Initial Training Establishment eg, ATR Pirbright or as in the case of Catterick, in the same Garrison as the Infantry Training Centre operating from the same police station as the local police (N. Yorks). Elsewhere, the RMP maintains small detachments in London, Edinburgh, Brecon and York. A Provost Company is based at Donnington, Shropshire, but this unit does not undertake Garrison policing tasks. SIB units are similarly based in the major garrison and detachment locations as their uniformed colleagues. In addition, the SIB maintains isolated detachments in Preston and at the Reserve Mobilisation and Training Centre at Chillwell.

  There is currently a one-man RMP Post at the ATR at Bassingbourn. Although not Initial Training Establishments, there is a one-man RMP Post at the Army Foundation College at Harrogate and another at the Defence School of Transport at Leconfield. However, all are due to close on 1 Apr 05, owing to restructuring as part of Future Army Structures (FAS).

  While there are members of the RMP serving at the ATR Winchester, on the permanent staff, they are employed solely on instructional duties and are not engaged in any SP capacity.

AO SY&PM(RAF)

  RAF Police are complemented on all the RAF's training establishments, delivering the full range of policing functions. Accordingly, the RAF Police would be well placed to take early pro-active action if any potential problem that required investigation was observed or brought to their attention. The numbers of RAF Police, by establishment, are as follows:

  RAF Cosford: The RAF Police Flt is commanded by a flt lt and comprises 18 other ranks (ORs).

  RAF Cranwell: The RAF Police Flt is commanded by a flt lt and comprises 16 ORs.

  RAF Halton: The RAF Police Flt is commanded by a flt lt and comprises 20 ORs. In addition, RAF P&SS Southern Region with an established strength of 1 ft lt and 24 ORs and the RAF Police School with an established strength of 1 sqn ldr, 6 flt lts and 41 ORs are co-located at RAF Halton.

  RAF Honnington: The RAF Police Flt is commanded by a flt lt and comprises 13 ORs.




53   Tri-Services Investigation Policy dated 1 Sep 99. Back

54   Case Reference CR/33156/03/INV dated 17 Oct 03. Back


 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 14 March 2005