Select Committee on Education and Skills Minutes of Evidence


Supplementary memorandum submitted by Martin Narey

RESPONSE TO QUESTION, QUESTION 584 (MR GIBB)

  With the introduction of NOMS, new sentencing arrangements and the new Offenders Learning and Skills Service, leaving custody needs increasingly to be seen as a transition within, not the end of, the offender's learning journey. New sentencing arrangements such as custody plus! minus and intermittent custody will see more offenders spending shorter periods in custody, with more active management of their sentences in the community. In addition, more offenders will be serving community sentences.

  That is an important part of the context in which we are setting a learning and skills service that will aim to make more systematic use of individual learning plans, with more thorough assessment early in the sentence, and with offenders' learning targets better linked to their needs.

  A weakness of the system at present—which we acknowledge—is the difficulty of attributing achievement of qualifications to individuals, and tracking their progress. The introduction of an offenders' learning database, (later to be linked to NOMIS) will also mean that qualifications gained by specific offenders will be recorded. Increasingly we shall be able to track the progress made by individuals at various stages.

  Accordingly, we do not consider it necessary to introduce a blanket assessment of progress at the fixed point of leaving custody. Were we to do so, this form of re-assessment of learners would entail significant costs. We estimate that if 100,000 offenders were to be re-assessed for forty minutes each (an initial screening takes between 20 and 30 minutes) the cost would be around £1.3 million. This figure has been calculated on the basis of assessment being delivered in-house by existing staff in prisons and probation services. It could cost substantially more if the assessment were performed by contractors. Such a cost would be at the expense of reducing other learning and skills provision.

RESPONSE TO QUESTION 590 (MR GIBB)

  The average sentence length was 12.6 months in 2003—that is for all courts, all offences (3.1 months at magistrates' courts and 26.3 months at the Crown Court). That would suggest that the average time served in prison is about 6 months (half).

2 February 2005





 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 4 April 2005