Select Committee on Education and Skills Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by the Heritage Lottery Fund

1.  BACKGROUND TO THE HERITAGE LOTTERY FUND

  1.1  The Heritage Lottery Fund (HLF) distributes money from the National Lottery to heritage projects across the United Kingdom. It is administered by the Trustees of the National Heritage Memorial Fund, a Non-Departmental Public Body sponsored by the Department for Culture, Media and Sport.

  1.2  Our Strategic Plan 2002-07, Broadening the Horizons of Heritage, identifies three broad aims:

    —  to conserve and enhance the UK's diverse heritage;

    —  to encourage more people to be involved in and make decisions about their heritage; and

    —  to ensure that everyone can learn about, have access to, and enjoy their heritage.

  We also aim to bring about a more equitable spread of our grants across the UK.

  1.3  Our funding supports all aspects of heritage from museums and archives to nature conservation to oral history and traditions; from local community activities to multi-million pound capital projects (see Appendix A for details for our grant programmes).

2.  HLF'S FUNDING FOR EDUCATION

  2.1  HLF welcomes the Education and Skills Committee's inquiry into Education Outside the Classroom. HLF provides a significant amount of funding to support education projects across all heritage sectors in the UK. Our submission to the select committee is thus from the perspective of a funder of a wide range of projects run by heritage sector organisations, and others, which deliver education outside the classroom.

  2.2  HLF defines education in broad terms to include formal and informal learning across the lifespan. Our funding helps individuals develop their understanding of heritage in an active way appropriate to their needs, interests and background.

  2.3  In formal learning, HLF-funded projects usually link their work to a taught curriculum in schools, colleges or universities and include activities such as:

    —  a school visit programme organised by a heritage site;

    —  support and development for teachers to work at a heritage site or with a heritage collection; and

    —  creating learning resources and activity programmes.

  2.4  In informal learning, HLF-funded projects include organised activities and resources which help people understand heritage sites or collections such as:

    —  open days;

    —  family activities;

    —  heritage skills workshops;

    —  interpretation panels and leaflets; and

    —  heritage trails.

  2.5  Recent research into HLF funding for education has shown that between 1994 and 2003:

    —  over £400 million of HLF funding has been awarded to 1,166 education projects;

    —  we have funded over 220 education spaces; and

    —  over 530 education posts.

  Within this overall picture, a huge range of educational activity and outreach programmes have been funded which involve children and young people in schools and colleges learning outside the classroom, for example, at museums, galleries, wildlife sites and parks.

3.  HLF'S RESEARCH INTO HERITAGE EDUCATION PROJECTS

  3.1  In spring 2004, HLF commissioned the Scottish Centre for Research in Education to undertake evaluation of the impact of our funding for curriculum linked learning for 5-19 year olds. A sample of 50 projects, taking place across the UK and involving all heritage sectors, is under evaluation. They range from "Hands-On Heritage", a Groundwork project involving young people in Cumbria, to a multi-cultural education project at the Abbeydale Industrial Hamlet in Sheffield. This research is still underway and a final report is due in summer 2005. However, interim findings from the first stages of the research have been used to inform this submission.

4.  DEFINING EDUCATION OUTSIDE THE CLASSROOM

  4.1  From an HLF perspective, it is clear that education outside the classroom is not necessarily outdoor learning. Learning which takes place in museums, archives, galleries, libraries, discovery centres and at industrial heritage sites can be termed "education outside the classroom" but does not necessarily have an outdoor element. To avoid confusion we suggest that the Committee carefully defines what it means by Education Outside the Classroom. To truly represent the range of activity that happens outside of school, HLF would like to see the widest definition adopted.

5.  COSTS AND FUNDING OF OUTDOOR ACTIVITIES

  5.1  HLF does not fund schools directly to carry out heritage learning activities. Nevertheless, the scale of our funding to heritage sector organisations and others for work with the formal education sector is an indication of the level of need which is not being met from elsewhere.

  5.2  Education outside the classroom is often run by charitable or voluntary organisations that do not have access to core funding for their educational work. Set up and delivery costs of education outside the classroom often have to be found from short term project funding such as that provided by the HLF. Absence of secure funding makes these educational services vulnerable.

  5.3  With HLF funding, sometimes heritage organisations are able to offer educational services free of charge (43% of the projects in our research sample made no charge). Where a charge is made this is usually at a subsidised rate and does not reflect the true cost of provision. Charges vary considerably and appear to range from £1 to £5 per pupil for a half day session. Yet such charges can be a barrier to participation for some schools.

  5.4  Heritage organisations and teachers report transport to sites as another key barrier to participation. Of the projects consulted in our research, 68% reported that coaches and minibuses were the main form of transport used by their participants to reach their sites. Where an HLF project has planned a programme designed to widen access by reaching out to deprived or excluded communities, HLF will support transport subsidies for schools and youth groups.

  5.5  Working outside the classroom generates additional costs for providers beyond the obvious ones of transport and service charges. On-site access to good quality learning spaces with adequate toilets and covered spaces for lunch is essential. There is a need for high quality, relevant and up-to-date learning materials and lesson plans to ensure that site based learning can be embedded into the curriculum. HLF has funded a range of learning spaces from pond dipping platforms to flexible indoor classrooms. Learning projects funded by HLF tend to be activity based but often result in the production of additional learning resources.

  5.6  Anecdotal evidence from heritage education officers suggests that many teachers lack the skills, equipment and confidence to deliver high quality learning in the field and appreciate the added value offered by a professional heritage service. We suggest that it is unrealistic to expect classroom teachers at primary level to have the necessary degree of expertise in the full range of curriculum subjects which might be covered in learning outside the classroom. Subject teachers at secondary level may not have the particular expertise related to a specific site or collection to extract the maximum benefit. There is a need, therefore, for co-professionals who are experts in using sites and collections for educational purpose to work alongside classroom teachers to deliver high quality learning sessions. Our research, and that of others (see, for example, Museums, Libraries and Archives Council, What did you learn at the museum today?, 2004), suggests that children place particular value on having access to such "experts" who share their specialist knowledge and open their eyes to new ways of learning and, indeed, new recreation and career opportunities.

6.  THE PLACE OF OUTDOOR LEARNING WITHIN THE CURRICULUM

  6.1  Our research has found that HLF funded projects that provide learning outside the classroom are helping to deliver most curriculum areas, with the exception of Modern Foreign Languages. The most commonly cited subjects were Local History, History, Art and Design, Science, Geography and Environmental Studies. Literacy, numeracy, PSHE and citizenship are also delivered at heritage sites.

  6.2  Heritage projects provide rich resources for interdisciplinary and innovative learning experiences, stimulating and exciting both teachers and students into new ways of thinking. Heritage sites and collections provide a special experience which cannot be duplicated in the classroom. Children and young people are inspired simply by being in a place and seeing things that are outside their day-to-day experience. Taking just a few examples from the portfolio of recent HLF projects, such experiences include:

    —  the amazing scale, and hidden mathematics, of Norwich Cathedral;

    —  the fragility and beauty of the dingy skipper butterfly and its place in the ecosystem;

    —  the earth shuddering power of a beam engine in full swing and the story this has to tell about the early Industrial Revolution; and

    —  the horror of a slave chain.

  6.3 As our research has shown, work outside the classroom is inspiring oral and written language development, understanding of mathematics and interest in science. It is also supporting citizenship education. In participating in HLF funded projects, children and young people are being offered the opportunity to greater appreciate the value and importance of heritage to our future well-being and sense of identity and understand our individual and collective responsibility to define, value and look after our shared environmental, cultural and social heritage.

  6.4  Teachers report the difference such visits can make in engaging those students who are less keen to learn in classroom settings or who are studying alternative curricula. Attitudinal and behavioural improvements in students can result from learning in new and exciting settings. Heritage contexts provide students with practical opportunities for group work which have tangible outcomes, for example researching and designing an exhibition at a museum or building and installing bat boxes at a nature reserve. Such experiences can provide useful support for young people in the transition to work.

  6.5  Some other examples of HLF-funded projects supporting education outside the classroom include:

    —   The Countryside is our Classroom project (HLF award: £44,000) funded an officer to work with the Bedfordshire Community Council to link farms and schools to help children learn about healthy living, country life and how food is produced.

    —  The Education and Community Action project run by Lincolnshire Wildlife Trust (HLF award: £365,000) has funded three education officer posts. They are providing a wide range of learning opportunities for all Key Stages at wildlife sites across Lincolnshire including pond dipping, species identification and food webs for younger students and residential weeks supporting biology field work at Gibraltar Point for older students.

    —  At Cressing Temple Barns in Essex, primary school children working on the shelters unit of the geography curriculum explore how the barns were constructed and then make their own model timber framed building from real materials, and learn some practical wattle and daubing techniques (HLF award: £70,000) .

    —  The Cultural Co-operation Year Round Education Project (HLF award: £409,000) delivers artistic residencies to schoolchildren in London to explore cultural traditions. The project includes provision for subsidised transport to take children with special needs to museums.

  6.6  Some projects have benefited from the support of their Local Education Authority, for example in facilitating teacher secondments to heritage organisations to develop curriculum materials, providing a classroom space for an education officer from a wildlife charity to carry out her teaching, or providing access to INSET programmes. Other projects have found LEAs to be uninterested and unresponsive.

  6.7  HLF can fund projects that promote vocational education. There is some indication that heritage sector organisations are becoming more proactive in offering work experience placements for young people at school and in college. Where this happens it is usually linked to the business or leisure studies curriculum. However, there is scope to extend this type of provision to other curriculum areas linked to vocational GCSEs and A Levels, even more so if the Tomlinson recommendations are agreed by the Government. We would like to see more awareness within Education Business Partnerships of the heritage sector as a venue for work experience and hence, an increase in the number of opportunities available to young people.

  6.8  Heritage organisations often build on contacts with young people in formal educational settings by offering "progression" activities such as volunteering, participating in youth forums and young people's clubs. We believe that enabling young people to build a longer term relationship with heritage organisations can have a profoundly beneficial effect on personal development and raise aspirations. This has been demonstrated by a separate strand of research at HLF which is evaluating our Young Roots grants programme. Young Roots aims to promote the involvement of young people (aged 13-25 years) with the heritage of the UK. The scheme is subject to a four year longitudinal evaluation which will consider the success of the scheme in meeting its aims and explore the impact of the scheme on participants, on communities and on partner delivery organisations.

7.  QUALIFICATION AND MOTIVATION OF TEACHERS

  7.1  Continuing Professional Development (CPD) for teachers to help them make effective use of heritage sites and resources to deliver out of class activities is provided by many of our grantees. CPD activities take the form of INSET days, open evenings, advisory groups brought together to design curriculum materials, secondments, formal training and student teacher placements. Grantees report that teachers often lack confidence and experience in working out of class and rely heavily on the expertise of heritage education staff. Team delivery by teachers and these co-professionals helps to build confidence and share good practice.

  7.2  Projects in our research have reported that they would like more input to CPD programmes to explain what is on offer and to develop innovative ways of working together. With CPD becoming the responsibility of the Teacher Training Agency there is an opportunity to open up development opportunities to all providers of curriculum-linked learning whether they are school based or based in heritage or other organisations.

  7.3  In the Mermaid's Purse project (HLF award: £88,200), the HLF-funded education officer worked with teachers and their pupils from a range of schools and with staff at St Martin's College. The project developed and piloted learning activities linked to environmental issues at Morecambe Bay, using an innovative teaching approach based on principles of philosophical enquiry. The young people learned about the complexity of the ecosystems within the Bay area and also extended their critical thinking skills. As part of the project a learning pack was made available to teachers across the counties involved and to new teacher trainees. Innovative, risky activities such as these build capacity within the teaching community and promote a willingness to explore new methods of curriculum delivery, increasing motivation of teachers and students.

  7.4  Teachers need good support from school managers and earmarked budgets to encourage them to undertake education outside the classroom and get the most out of these experiences. We suggest that more could be done to encourage all schools to participate in these valuable enrichment activities.

8.  FEAR OF ACCIDENTS AND THE POSSIBILITY OF LITIGATION

  8.1  Our grantees report concerns that health and safety guidelines constrain visits to heritage sites. Whilst children, their parents and teachers have the right to expect safe practices to be in place, there appears to be a tendency to assume that all out of classroom learning carries the same degree of risk. In extreme cases this has led to schools adopting a "no visits" policy. Many of our heritage sector grantees are supporting their teacher colleagues by carrying out their own risk assessments and making these available for schools to use, thus alleviating some of the work involved in meeting health and safety standards.

Dr Sharon Goddard

Education Advisor, Policy and Research Department

APPENDIX A:

THE HERITAGE LOTTERY FUND'S GRANT PROGRAMMES

Repair Grants for Places of Worship

  This is a replacement for the Joint Places of Worship Scheme (which only applied in England) and aims to manage the enormous demand for our funds in this area of heritage. The new scheme will focus on urgent repairs and bring about a better balance between funding and conservation priorities across the UK.

Heritage Grants

  This programme offers grants of £50,000 or more to organisations which aim to look after and enhance the UK's heritage; to increase involvement in heritage activities; and to improve access to and enjoyment of heritage. It caters for a wide range of projects, including the very largest and most complicated.

Project Planning Grants

  These grants of between £5,000 and £50,000 are available to help in the early planning of projects which are expected to lead to an application for a Heritage Grant.

Your Heritage

  This programme offers grants of between £5,000 and £50,000 for projects which either care for heritage or increase people's understanding and enjoyment of it. Projects should also make it easier for people to gain access to heritage and benefit the community and the wider public. The application form is much simpler than that for Heritage Grants.

Young Roots

  Young Roots promotes the involvement of young people, 13 to 25 years old, in their heritage. The programme offers grants of between £5,000 and £25,000. To be eligible for a grant, a project must increase opportunities for young people to learn about and get involved in their heritage, and be delivered through partnerships.

Awards for All

  We run Awards for All along with other Lottery distributors at a local level. Through this scheme, we give grants of between £500 and £5,000 to small community groups, including new groups. We can fund up to 100% of the project costs.

Local Heritage Initiative

  This initiative helps local groups to investigate, explain and care for their local landmarks, landscape, traditions and culture. Through grants of between £3,000 and £25,000, the scheme helps local groups with a range of small-scale projects.

  The scheme is run on our behalf by the Countryside Agency in England and is being piloted in Scotland by partnerships led by Scottish Natural Heritage, and in Wales by the Countryside Council for Wales.

October 2004


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 10 February 2005