Select Committee on Education and Skills Minutes of Evidence


Memorandum submitted by the Department for Education and Skills

SUMMARY

  1.  The evidence in the following pages sets out the measures that the DfES has put in place to support schools in the effective teaching of reading, centred largely, though not exclusively, on the work of the National Strategies. The essential elements of our approach are to ensure that:

    —  there is a clear focus on and commitment to raising standards in reading and literacy at every level in the system, both through bespoke lessons and across the curriculum;

    —  teachers and leaders in all schools have easy access to the best, evidenced based, methodologies for teaching reading and are trained to use them effectively;

    —  there is a clear and early emphasis on phonics instruction, reinforced by complementary reading strategies such as context, grammatical knowledge and word recognition;

    —  teaching is tailored effectively to the needs of individual children, with bespoke interventions for those performing both below and significantly above age-related expectations;

    —  there are appropriate structured programmes in place for children below school age, which develop their communication and literacy skills within the context of play-based learning;

    —  we engage parents and the wider community fully in supporting children to learn to read and to enjoy reading; and

    —  we build capacity within schools and Local Authorities to improve continuously, and intervene decisively in the instance of failure.

BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT

  2.  In 1996 Ofsted published its report The Teaching of Reading in 45 Inner London Primary Schools which crystallised concerns about standards in literacy. The report highlighted the lack of focus on reading, the poor quality of teaching and the small number of schools using a balanced approach to reading which included the systematic teaching of phonics. In 1997 only 67% of 11 year olds achieved the expected level for their age in reading, and 63% in English, in National Curriculum Tests.

  3.  The National Literacy Strategy was introduced to all schools in England in September 1998 to respond directly to these concerns. From the outset the remit of the National Literacy Strategy has been very clear. Its purpose was, and is, to raise standards of literacy throughout the primary age range, to support teachers to deliver the primary programmes of study for reading and writing as set out in the National Curriculum, and to make a significant contribution to the development of speaking and listening.

  4.  Drawing on international research and best practice, the National Literacy Strategy set out a Framework for Teaching which schools delivered through the Literacy Hour. This was reinforced by subject specific training for teachers, intervention in schools that were failing their pupils, and the setting of clear targets at school, local and national levels. The National Year of Reading, and the continuing Reading Campaign which accompanied the National Literacy Strategy, had a significant impact on raising the profile of reading not just with schools but also with families and the wider community.

  5.  This clear focus on raising standards in literacy and English extends beyond the primary years to both Foundation Stage and Key Stage 3 (KS3). The Foundation Stage, first introduced in 2000, provides a structured framework for a play-based approach to learning for three to five year olds, which includes an emphasis on early literacy, language and communication. The Key Stage 3 National Strategy, which has been introduced progressively since 2001, is committed to raising standards in English, and literacy across the curriculum for all 11 to 14-year-olds. Between 1998 and 2001, prior to the introduction of the Key Stage 3 National Strategy, English results at age 14 were static and lacked year-on-year progression.

  6.  In 2003 the National Literacy Strategy was combined with the National Numeracy Strategy to become the Primary National Strategy. This allowed us to create a more coherent delivery structure and organisational model, and to interact with schools more effectively on whole-school teaching and learning issues. Throughout this evolution the core aims and principles of the strategy have remained consistent, and the teaching methods and materials which lie at the heart of the strategy continue to be refreshed and informed by the latest research and inspection evidence.

NATIONAL TRENDS IN READING PERFORMANCE

Attainment Tests

  7.  Since the introduction of the National Literacy Strategy in 1998 standards in reading at both Key Stage 1 and 2 have increased significantly. Between 1998 and 2004 the percentage of pupils achieving the expected level for their age in National Curriculum tests in reading went up from 80% to 85% at Key Stage 1 (approximately 30,000 more children), and from 67% to 83% at Key Stage 2 (approximately 96,000 more children). The percentage of 14 year olds achieving the expected level for their age in English at KS3 increased from 65% to 71% over the same period. Reading results at Key Stage 3 have only been separately available for the last two years, so it is not possible to construct a comparative time series. This year 65% of the cohort achieved the expected level for their age in reading. This improvement is also reflected in international comparisons (see para 61).

  8.  The graphs below illustrate how results have risen in both reading and English at all three key stages between 1997 and 2004:



Quality of Teaching

  9.  Ofsted reports provide further evidence on the quality of the teaching of reading. In 2002 Ofsted reported on the impact of the first four years of the National Literacy Strategy. It found that:

    "The National Literacy Strategy has had a significant impact on the standards attained in English and the quality of teaching over the last four years".

  10.  It also found that since the start of the strategy the proportion of lessons where the teaching of shared reading was good or better increased from just over 50% to nearly 70%. Over the same period the quality of the teaching of guided reading improved from a position where Ofsted described it as "often poor" to a situation in which it was taught well in 60% of lessons, with weaknesses remaining in just 10%.

TEACHING READING THROUGH THE NATIONAL STRATEGIES—METHODOLOGY AND EVIDENCE BASE

  11.  The rationale of the National Strategies is to promote literacy—not just reading and certainly not just decoding—at every stage of reading development from Foundation Stage to Key Stage 3. Through the provision of nationally kite marked materials, face to face training and direct support to both teachers and teaching assistants, the National Strategies help schools to develop the positive learning environments in which the effective teaching of literacy can take place. At every level from the pupil to the teacher, the school and the Local Authority, the National Strategies aim to ensure that tailored challenge and support is available to enable those falling behind to catch up as well as to stretch the most able.

  12.  The National Literacy Strategy Framework for Teaching provides a structure for teaching reading focused on word, sentence and text level objectives. These are mirrored in the application of the literacy hour in schools as a system of connected methodologies for teaching the reading and writing of texts. This approach to reading, advocated throughout the Foundation Stage and primary years, provides a solid platform for the later emphasis on research, literature and study skills taught at Key Stage 3.

The Searchlights Model

  13.  The National Strategies advocate a model of teaching reading which has come to be known by the "Searchlights" metaphor. The Searchlights model places a very clear emphasis on the teaching of phonics, which is reinforced by pupils' knowledge of context, grammar and graphic or word recognition:


  14.  The model characterises reading as the ability to coordinate and orchestrate a variety of strategies for:

    —  Fast automatic phonic decoding.

    —  The recognition of word and word parts.

    —  Predictions from knowledge of syntax to make sense of strings of words.

    —  Predictions from context to aid comprehension.

  15.  The two related aspects of the reading process, decoding and comprehension, are therefore represented in the model and complement each other.

  16.  A strong emphasis is placed on the teaching of phonics, but the National Strategies do not advocate the teaching and application of phonics in isolation from other reading strategies. Pupils are encouraged to use a variety of strategies to reinforce their phonological understanding, to look for analogies between the known and unfamiliar, to predict and make sense of what they are reading and writing, and to develop the practice of self-monitoring and self-correction.

  17.  The "Searchlights" metaphor attempts to describe a methodology for teaching reading which optimises the range of "cues" or inputs for the pupil, enabling them to cross refer between them. The more "searchlights" that are switched on, the less critical it is if one of them fails.

  18.  This approach to teaching reading enjoys a broad base of support among education professionals, including Ofsted and the professional associations. It is not, however, without its detractors. A minority advocates a "phonics only" approach to teaching reading. Their argument proceeds from the assumption that reading is a hierarchical process that moves seamlessly from the learning of atomic parts into integrated and complex skills.

  19.  The exclusive teaching of phonics precludes the teaching of hypothesising, problem solving, predicting or inferring, which form an integral part of the Searchlights model. The National Strategies, by contrast, characterise reading as a more sophisticated skill in which a range of strategies linked to decoding and comprehension interact and mutually support each other in the process of getting to the meaning of a text.

The Teaching of Phonics

  20.  Within this overall context, the National Strategies have always been clear about the importance of effective teaching and learning of phonics. This includes continuing to teach phonics in KS3 in the context of spelling and with pupils who are still behind with their reading. The principles which underpin the national strategies approach to phonics are:

    —  Children should be taught as quickly as possible to identify, segment and blend phonemes in speech and writing.

    —  This should be taught directly, not left to inference or invention.

    —  Phonic knowledge and skills should be taught and practised to a level where decoding and spelling become habitual and operate at the level of "tacit knowledge"

    —  Phonics should be taught as a separate set of skills and knowledge within the broader structure of the literacy hour. It should not be taught through texts or text reading, but should be applied to the reading and writing of texts in the following ways:

    —  Through the application of phonic strategies to texts in shared and guided reading;

    —  By using texts for reading which exemplify particular phonemic structures; and

    —  Through phonic word building in the context of shared writing.

  21.   Progression in Phonics is the principal resource provided for teachers by the National Strategies to support the teaching of phonics. It was published following extensive consultation and a thorough review of research evidence and successful practices. It was distributed to all schools and accompanied by a day's funded training for 20,000 teachers in Reception and Year 1.

  22.  The Progression in Phonics programme, which was updated this year, consists of a book of teaching materials, a training pack for literacy consultants to use with teachers and a training CD-ROM for teachers to use independently. The book outlines the basic principles of the phonemic system and then describes a detailed programme for teaching phonics in seven steps. This programme builds on the guidance for teaching phonics set out in the original National Literacy Strategy Framework for Teaching, but accelerates the recommended pace at which phonics are taught.

Synthetic versus analytic phonics

  23.  The distinction between synthetic and analytic phonics is a frequently publicised aspect to the debate about the different methods for teaching phonics. Simply defined synthetic phonics refers to a method of direct instruction in which children learn to combine letters to read words. Analytic phonics, by contrast, is an indirect teaching method in which children are expected to infer information about letters and how they combine to form words.

  24.  The approach advocated through the National Strategies is a synthetic phonics approach, as it relies on direct teaching and the recognition and blending of letter to form words. It does not rule out the possibility that children will supplement their knowledge and understanding of a text through inference, and hence could be described as drawing on some elements of an analytical approach. However, it is clear that synthetic phonics is the principal method of instruction.

The evidence base

  25.  From their inception the National Strategies have been firmly rooted in the evidence base, drawing on international research findings over a 30 year period. The Strategies have also learnt from the results of inspections and known best practice. M J Adams' comprehensive investigation into the effectiveness of reading instruction programmes, Beginning to Read, published in 1990, strongly influenced the Strategies later design. Her research found that:

    "Neither understanding nor meaning can proceed hierarchically, from the bottom up. Phonological awareness, letter recognition facility, familiarity with spelling patterns, spelling-sound relations and individual words must be developed in concert with real reading and real writing, and with deliberate reflection on the forms, functions and meanings of texts."

  26.  This is representative of a broad body of research which, while seeing a critical role for the teaching of phonics, contradicts the suggestion that phonics should be taught and learnt in isolation. In 1997 US Congress commissioned the establishment of a National Reading Panel to assess the status of research based knowledge, including the effectiveness of various approaches to teaching children to read. The Panel's report, Teaching Children to Read, published in 2000 found that phonemic awareness and instruction, guided oral reading, vocabulary instruction and text comprehension instruction all have a positive effect on the learning of reading and comprehension skills. The report states:

    "Teachers must understand that systematic phonics instruction is only one component—albeit a necessary component—of a total reading program; systematic phonics instruction should be integrated with other reading instruction in phonemic awareness, fluency and comprehension strategies to create a complete reading program . . . while phonics skills are necessary in order to learn to read, they are not sufficient in their own right."

  27.  Every year Ofsted has reviewed the implementation and practices of the National Literacy Strategy, and now the Primary National Strategy. The programme has therefore had an unmatched regular flow of evidence to inform its continuing development. The DfES has also been proactive in seeking out fresh evidence to inform the way we support the teaching of reading. Last year, in response to a 2002 Ofsted report which identified some weaknesses in the teaching of phonics, the department convened a Phonics seminar which drew on a range of expertise, including the Reading Reform Foundation, and was independently chaired by Professor Greg Brooks.

  28.  The findings of the seminar were that a major redirection of the phonics element of the NLS was neither necessary nor appropriate. The papers from the seminar, including Professor Greg Brooks' concluding report, can be found on the Primary National Strategy section of the DfES Standards Site. We have also separately published all the background research underpinning the teaching of English at Key Stage 3 in "Roots and Research", which is a research review compiled by Colin Harrison of Nottingham University.

  29.  As a result of the seminar described above, the supplement to Progression in phonics, Playing with Sounds, was produced for primary schools in Spring 2004, to make it a more detailed and fully resourced programme.

PUTTING POLICY INTO PRACTICE

  30.  The National Strategies provide an effective way of putting policy into practice. The real strength of the National Strategies delivery model lies in the combination of high quality lesson planning, CPD and intervention materials, with direct support and challenge provided to schools and local authorities by credible and experienced practitioners.

  31.  Through the strategies we employ a cadre of Regional Directors who work directly with Local Authority school improvement teams. The Regional Directors bring specific phase and subject experience to their interaction with Local Authorities, as well as providing support on whole school improvement issues, alignment and capacity building.

  32.  At a local level we have developed a rich mix of support for schools. National Strategies consultants, employed by Local Authorities and trained by Regional Directors, form the backbone of this. They work directly with teachers in schools to provide training, challenge and support on subject pedagogy and whole school improvement issues. We have also trained and developed a number of leading teachers at both primary and Key Stage 3 who are embedded in schools, but are able to spend a proportion of their time on outreach activities to support colleagues in other schools. Furthermore at primary level 10% of the best teachers have become Primary Strategy Consultant Leaders and through the leadership programme provide support to headteachers in underperforming schools.

  33.  Through this mixed economy of support the National Strategies have a reach well beyond individual subjects. Through the expertise offered by consultants, leading teachers and consultant leaders we are able to support schools across the range of whole school improvement issues, such as leadership, assessment for learning or behaviour. It has been just these issues which Ofsted have repeatedly highlighted as critical to making further improvement in the teaching of literacy and numeracy. The National Strategies provide a delivery mechanism, unparalleled in other areas of education, to address unacceptable variations in performance and to build capacity for further improvement.

  34.  Ofsted reports have been consistently positive about the quality of support that consultants offer schools. In their 2002 report on the first four years of the National Literacy Strategy Ofsted commented:

    "The NLS consultants have played a significant role in training teachers and supporting schools. Their impact over the last four years has been very positive, both in terms of face-to-face training, as well as their contribution to a range of materials to support teaching, published nationally as well as in their own LEAs."

  35.  The rising trend in national attainment from the foundation stage up to Key Stage 3 suggests that this combination of direct support, training and high quality materials and guidance is paying dividends. However, we realise that achieving further improvement is critical and that there is no room for complacency. Raw attainment scores, value added data and Ofsted reports all point to the fact that there is still too much variation in the teaching of literacy and standards attained between schools whose pupils and contexts are broadly similar. Bringing these schools up to the level of the best is a key priority for the National Strategies.

  36.  We have an ambitious programme of work underway to address this. In primary schools our priorities for 2005-6 are to:

    —  Support the more effective leadership of the teaching of reading by Headteachers and subject leaders.

    —  A further emphasis on guided reading and importance of tracking progress by individual children.

    —  Support schools and early years settings to engage parents in children's reading, building on the recently produced materials "Parents, partners in children's learning."

    —  Support more effective teaching of reading at the point of transition from KS1 to KS2.

  37.  At KS3, consolidating pupils' basic literacy skills in the early years of secondary education will continue to be a major priority. The KS3 National Strategy will develop new materials on the teaching of reading and will offer support and CPD opportunities to schools which focus on appropriate strategies for teaching reading and making best use of the class novel for pupils of different ages and abilities, as well as responding to the strengths and weaknesses highlighted by the National Curriculum tests.

Supporting reading beyond the classroom

  38.  Beyond the direct work of the National Strategies with schools and Local Authorities, we are also support the wider promotion of reading, in particular reading for pleasure, with children and families.

  39.  For example, the Department funds the National Literacy Trust to run the National Reading Campaign. Key elements of the National Reading Campaign include the Reading Connects initiative which supports teachers and staff, such as school librarians, to develop reading-rich environments and raise the profile of reading for pleasure, and the Reading Champions scheme which finds and celebrates positive role models for reading, and demonstrates the impact of motivational and peer support in domestic, educational and community settings.

  40.  We have also been active in harnessing wider community resources to support reading. Through the Playing for Success initiative we have established out of school hours study support centres at football clubs and other sports' grounds. The centres use the environment and medium of football, rugby and other sports as motivational tools, and focus on raising literacy, numeracy and ICT standards amongst Key Stage 2 and 3 pupils who are struggling and often demotivated. National evaluation shows that the reading comprehension of KS3 pupils who took part in the scheme improved by eight months.

  41.  We also engage directly with parents to enable them to support their child's reading. For example, we have produced two leaflets for parents on reading in the "Help Your Child to Learn series" which offer ideas and suggestions from parents for improving a child's reading. In addition the Department works with parents whose own low levels of literacy might inhibit the support they can offer their children. For example, the Family Literacy Language and Numeracy programme, which will involve some 100,000 families in 2004-05, seeks to develop literacy, language and numeracy skills of parents and children. Reading plays a key role in this. Family Literacy programmes will encourage parents and children to share books together to read and to talk about what they have read.

EQUITY AND INCLUSION

  42.  The notion that teaching and learning is most effective when it is tailored to the needs of the individual child is deeply rooted in the National Strategies. We have focused on assessment for learning and effective use of data, giving teachers the tools to personalise learning effectively, and to involve pupils more in understanding their personal progression. This helps to foster a clear link between lesson planning and student learning.

  43.  We have put in place a range of initiatives and programmes in every Key Stage to support schools in teaching reading to pupils with Special Educational Needs (SEN) and those at risk of falling behind, and pupils with English as an additional language (EAL).

  44.  The National Strategies also challenge the most fluent readers to improve their skills. The Primary National Strategy allows for the fact that some children will be reading well before the start of the Foundation Stage and provides for their skills to be progressively developed.

  45.  At Primary level we have supported schools with the development of materials specifically designed to help teachers to identify better the learning characteristics of gifted and talented children and to adapt the literacy hour and daily mathematics lesson to meet their needs. Similarly at Key Stage 3 we have disseminated a series of modular units that schools can use within a planned professional development programme, which look at whole school issues around identifying and teaching more able pupils, as well as subject specific provision.

Catch up programmes and SEN intervention

  46.  For primary schools we promote a number of intervention programmes for children reading at below age related expectations to help them catch up. These include Early Literacy Support (ELS) for pupils in Year 1, Additional Literacy Support (ALS) in Year 3, and Further Literacy Support (FLS) for Pupils in Year 5, all of which provide for structured support from a teaching assistant in addition to the daily literacy hour. These intervention programmes are designed to reinforce a suggested model of intervention at different levels of need, based on three "waves":

    —  Wave 1: The effective inclusion of all children in a high quality primary experience incorporating the literacy hour and daily mathematics lesson.

    —  Wave 2: Small group intervention for children who can be expected to catch up with their peers as a result of the intervention (ELS, ALS, FLS).

    —  Wave 3: Specific targeted approaches for children identified as requiring SEN intervention.

  47.  Schools use a number of programmes for intervention at Wave 3. The department directly funds the Institute of Education for its work with the Reading Recovery National Network, but there are many other programmes available. The National Strategies are committed to ensuring that schools are provided with the evidence on which of the many existing interventions have been evaluated and can show evidence of impact. Much of this research is summarised in the National Literacy Strategy publication Targeting support: choosing and implementing interventions for children with significant literacy difficulties. At Key Stage 3 we have also produced a step by step guide to teaching phonics in special schools.

  48.  At Key Stage 3 we promote the continued teaching of phonics in spelling for all children in year 7 as well as focused work for children who have fallen behind. The range of intervention and support materials provided by the KS3 National Strategy for reading includes teaching units on phonics; information retrieval and reading between the lines. A set of teaching units on reading for pupils in year 7 who are working below national expectations; a training scheme and resources for reading mentor partnerships and a set of teaching units for year 9 pupils working below national expectations. Through the effective use of these materials, and dedicated support from consultants we hope to achieve greater gains in Key Stage 3 reading performance in future years.

English as an Additional Language

  49.  Traditionally pupils who have English as an additional language (EAL) have made slower progress at reading and English overall. We are committed to reversing this trend. Effective teaching and learning to meet the needs of minority ethnic pupils and those whose first language is not English is based on equality and inclusion and valuing the background and heritage of every child. In terms of bilingual children effective strategies have proven the value of recognising a child's first language as a strength on which to build.

  50.  Recognising pupils' abilities in their first language allows for English language, grammar and vocabulary to develop from pupils' knowledge and understanding of these concepts in their first language. DfES' recently published research report Making a Difference: Teaching and Learning Strategies in Successful Multi Ethnic Schools supports this approach. This report, along with established good practice, demonstrates that schools that have been successful in raising the attainment of minority ethnic pupils also value the first language of bilingual pupils in extending learning across the curriculum and in making effective links with parents and the wider community.

  51.  This year we are running EAL specific training in over 200 pilot schools in 21 pilot LEAs as part of the Primary National Strategy. Through this pilot, schools will put into practice a whole year's worth of intensive EAL development, linked to EAL specific approaches to the four aspects of literacy: reading, writing, speaking and listening. For children with EAL a focus on comprehension as well as decoding, and on developing oracy in the context of guided reading sessions is critical.

Boys' reading

  52.  Boys have responded particularly well to the teaching and learning approaches advocated by the National Strategies. These include structured, varied and interactive lessons; clear teaching objectives; demonstration and modelling of reading strategies by the teacher and guided reading in groups where feedback at the point of learning is given as pupils undertake reading tasks for themselves. At Key Stage 3, this has led to narrowing of the gender gap in English by five percentage points over the period 2000 to 2004. At Key Stage 2 schools have made big improvements in boys writing, where the percentage of boys achieving a level four increased by four percentage points this year. However, we recognise that we still need to do more to translate these gains into reading.

INTRODUCTION OF EARLY LITERACY STRATEGIES

  53.  Evidence suggests that investment in the early years pays real dividends in terms of outcomes for children generally, including teaching children to read. The Effective Provision of Pre-school Education (EPPE) longitudinal research, which tracked the progress of more than 3,000 children between the ages of three and seven, shows that good quality pre-school has a positive effect on children's cognitive attainment on entry to reception and recent findings show that these effects continue up to the end of KS1 (age seven years).

  54.  Some of the key quality and practice factors that contribute to child outcomes in the range of early years settings tell us the the quality of pre-school centres is directly related to better intellectual / cognitive development in children. These suggest that an earlier start is related to better intellectual development and improved independence and concentration. NFER research also states that attending some form of pre-school is associated with higher early literacy attainment at ages five and six.

  55.  This is borne out by other international research which shows that structured teaching of reading, including phonics instruction, at a young age has a positive effect. The US National Reading Panel report, Teaching Children to Read, referred to above found that:

    "Although conventional wisdom has suggested that kindergarten students might not be ready for phonics instruction, this assumption was not supported by the data. The effects of systematic early phonics instruction were significant and substantial in kindergarten and the 1st grade, indicating that systematic phonics programs should be implemented at those age and grade levels."

  56.  Building on these and other research findings we have invested in support for children's learning from a very early age. We know that early language and communication development are vital pre-cursors to literacy and therefore much of our early years work, through Sure Start, is around supporting this and the sharing of books from a young age. We are fully funding the Bookstart programme which encourages parents to read with their children from birth. A bag containing two baby books, a booklet explaining how and why to share books with young children, a booklist and an invitation to join the local library is given to parents by their Health Visitor at the eight month health check. From 2005 we are funding an extension to the Bookstart programme through which we will aim to reach all children at 18 to 24 months, and at three years old. Alongside this the Birth to Three Matters framework encourages practitioners to explore reading in variety of ways such as sharing stories, songs, rhymes and games, and learning about words and meaning.

  57.  The Foundation Stage provides a structure within which children and practitioners can develop children's communication and language skills through adult planned and child initiated learning, so that by the end of the Foundation Stage they can use their phonic knowledge to write and read a range of common words. In 2004 the Primary National Strategy was extended to include expert support for the Foundation Stage, and published "Progression in Phonics: Playing with Sounds" to guide practitioners in foundation stage settings in the delivery of appropriate, fast and early teaching of phonics and phonological awareness.

  58.  We are also developing the Communicating matters project, the aim of which is to produce high quality training materials for practitioners so that they can develop children's speech and language as fully as possible during the Foundation Stage. We aim to disseminate the training materials from September 2005.

INTERNATIONAL COMPARISONS

Learning from international best practice

  59.  As set out in paragraph 25 and following, the original design and subsequent development of the National Strategies' approach to teaching reading has been informed by the best available international evidence. This includes M J Adams' seminal study Beginning to Read, commissioned by US Congress in 1990, as well as the US National Reading Panel Report, Teaching Children to Read, 2000.

  60.  The full research base is set out in some detail in Roger Beard's National Literacy Strategy: Review of Research and Other Related Evidence. There he draws attention not just to the formal international research which informed the design of the National Literacy Strategy, but also to a number of small and large scale intervention projects underway in countries across the world whose practice was highly influential. These include the kinds of general practices found in New Zealand's schools (as cited Ofsted in 1993); intervention programmes to tackle disadvantage among pupils and schools in Melbourne and Sydney in Australia (for example the Early Literacy Research project led by Carmel Crevola and Peter Hill); and a number of projects implemented across the USA.

Comparative International Performance

  61.  International comparisons of performance in reading indicate that England is now among the best in the world. The Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS) conducted in March 2001 found that England's 10 year olds were the third most able readers out of the 35 countries included in the study and performed significantly better than all other English speaking countries that took part. This shows a marked contrast to a international study using different methods reported in 1996, in which England performed at the international average.

Early Years Education

  62.  Comparing different international approaches to early years education, and the teaching of literacy in particular, has stimulated wide ranging debate. As set out above there is a wide body of research conducted both in the UK and abroad which points to the educational value of early literacy teaching. Roger Beard's research summary is again informative on this point. He makes reference to the Commission of Reading of the USA National Academy of Education which found that a country receives highest returns on its investment in education from the early years of schooling when children are first learning to read and write.

  63.  The EPPE research, cited at paragraph 53 above, clearly points to the advantages of access to high quality early education in terms of children's social and cognitive outcomes. It also shows how this is particularly important for children from disadvantaged communities. Although it is true that in many countries school starting age is one or two years later than in England, and children do as well later on, this is a simplistic interpretation of what happens. In Finland and other countries there is strong family and society support for literacy, and books and reading are part of children's day to day lives well before they are formally admitted to school. Research evidence (Desforges etc) tells us how significant such parental support is for children's achievements which is why engaging parents to support their children's learning is at the heart of government policy.

  64.  Underlying the concerns of critics is often an erroneous assumption that we are bringing young children into school early and exposing them to inappropriately formal approaches to learning to read. The Foundation Stage, which includes the reception year, was introduced to address just such concerns and ensures that learning is based on well planned play in ways which meet the particular needs of three, four and five year old children. We have invested heavily in training to ensure that practitioners understand these appropriate approaches.

CONCLUSION

  65.  Since the introduction of the National Literacy Strategy in 1998 there has been significant improvement in attainment in reading and English at every key stage. This is the single most persuasive piece of evidence for the underlying strength of the National Strategies model. The key is now to build on this momentum to achieve further improvements in coming years. Supporting and challenging more schools to achieve at the level of the best is a clear priority, and will require a focus on precision, both in teaching and targeting the needs of individual children. We are confident that the National Strategies provide the right combination of deep and credible educational expertise with a strong and far reaching delivery structure to support schools to improve still further.

30 November 2004





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 7 April 2005