Select Committee on Education and Skills Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by the Association of Accounting Technicians

1.  INTRODUCTION

  1.1  The Association of Accounting Technicians (AAT) welcomes this opportunity to provide written evidence to the Education and Skills Select Committee inquiry into the National Skills Strategy.

  1.2  The AAT is the UK's largest awarding body of vocational accounting qualifications, awarding 83% of NVQ certificates in Accounting in 2001-02 (DfES). It is also a highly respected professional membership organisation that works with, and is sponsored by, four of the UK's leading chartered accountancy bodies: CIPFA, ICAEW, CIMA and ICAS. The AAT's Accounting Qualification (consisting of NVQ Levels 2, 3 and 4 in Accounting) provides well-established progression route to all the UK's senior accountancy bodies. Almost every Modern Apprentice in accounting completes their qualification through the AAT.

  1.3  The AAT provides a recognised professional qualification and membership body for accounting technicians with 100,000 student, affiliate, full and fellow members worldwide (our membership is a similar size to that of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors). The AAT provides a framework for the lifelong learning and development of its members. One quarter of our members are in the 16-24 age group.

  1.4  The AAT represents accounting technicians working at various levels in the accounting and finance function in all industries and sectors, and organisations large and small. Some AAT members are regulated to provide accounting services on a self-employed basis. They provide cost-effective accountancy and taxation services to small and medium-sized organisations and the public.

2.  NEED FOR PRACTICAL SKILLS-BASED QUALIFICATIONS

  2.1  The AAT fully supports the Government's stated objective of increasing the UK's skill levels and encouraging lifelong learning to ensure the UK's economy is competitive. The AAT believes that the Government will achieve this objective by a more strategic focus on practical skills-based qualifications. By directing adequate funding at vocational skills-based qualifications, rather than non skills-based qualifications, the Government will send a clear message that its priority is to raise the employability and effectiveness of the UK workforce.

  2.2  The AAT supports the principle of widening access to, and participation in, vocational training within the 14-19 age group and is working with a school on a pilot project to deliver an NVQ in accounting for the 14-16 year age group. It is essential that work like this is given adequate funding and promotion to achieve parity of esteem between academic and vocational qualifications and make skills-based qualifications a real option within this age group.

3.  NEED FOR CONSISTENCY BETWEEN POLICY AND IMPLEMENTATION

  3.1  We believe it is imperative that the Government and its delivery agencies—the DfES, QCA and LSC—work more effectively together at national, regional and local level. Consistency between policy and implementation is vital. Where there is not a clear understanding or follow-through on the rationale behind policies at the implementation stage, the outcome is affected. The AAT is concerned by the apparent lack of a clear overall national skills strategy and accountability for delivery. Clarity is hampered by the plethora of agencies involved and the lack of coherence in their roles and responsibilities. The current structures are wasteful of resources. We urge the Government to undertake an intelligent reform of this framework for delivery in the interest of learners and employers.

  3.2  A specific example of where more work needs to be done in this area is with the Modern Apprenticeship frameworks. It is essential, if these are to retain employer support, that flexibility is applied so that the achievement of the different components: NVQs, Technical Certificates and Key Skills, does not require duplication of assessment. Where the Technical Certificate and Key Skills are embedded in NVQs, as is the case with the AAT's NVQs in Accounting, this should be recognised by regulatory agencies and funders.

4.  ONEROUS REGULATION

  4.1  The AAT believes that the regulation of NVQs places too much emphasis on rigid rules and regulations, and not enough emphasis on fitness for purpose or the needs of the market.

  4.2  More emphasis must be given to balancing employer and learner demand with the necessary incentive for training providers to deliver qualifications. Government strategy, and the work of agencies supporting and implementing the strategy, must be focussed on skills and outcomes, not input and process.

  4.3  In particular, the AAT's qualification is in danger of being disadvantaged by onerous regulation created by being an NVQ. This is encouraging Further Education colleges to consider ceasing delivery of the AAT's qualification in favour of qualifications which are not skills-based and which have less regulation. The regulatory burden is exacerbated by the overlapping regulatory regimes of the different agencies involved in quality assurance: QCA, ALI and LSC at national and local levels. The AAT is not convinced that these regulatory requirements, which are costly and resource intensive, are adding value for learners or employers.

5.  PROFILE OF SKILLS-BASED QUALIFICATIONS

  5.1  The AAT believes that much work is still needed to raise the profile of skills-based qualifications and promote them as a professional and credible route to qualifications higher than NVQ level 4.

  5.2  The AAT's qualifications plug the skills gaps identified in the 21st Century Skills paper at both level 2 and at associate professional or technical level. The AAT offers a lifelong learning package and an excellent progression route from level 2 through to senior level qualifications. The AAT's qualification and membership develop relevant, practical accounting and finance skills for life.

  5.3  The AAT recognises that improving the credibility of skills-based qualifications depends on ensuring that they lead to worthwhile career opportunities. For this reason, the AAT has developed a popular and successful fast-track route for those holding the AAT's NVQ level 4 qualification to become a Chartered Accountant with the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW). This route provides a high-quality vocational opportunity which puts holders of the AAT qualification on a par with university graduates. Employers of the AAT's Modern Apprentices in Accounting have warmly welcomed fast-track. The proportion of ICAEW students entering with NVQs increased from 5.4% in 2001-02 to 8.7% in 2002-03.

6.  FUNDING OF NATIONAL FRAMEWORK QUALIFICATIONS

  6.1  There is increasing evidence of the distribution of funding to qualifications outside the national framework raising doubts among Further Education colleges as to whether they should offer qualifications within the national framework. There is also very little difference now between funding for qualifications which are skills-based and those which aren't. Thus there is a lack of incentive for training providers to offer qualifications which increase the UK's skills base because, as explained in 4 (above), these come with increased regulatory requirements.

  6.2  There is little incentive for qualifications to be inside the framework since decisions on funding of learning in the FE Sector are made by the LSC, not the QCA. As a result, accreditation by the QCA, and the distinction between skills based qualifications and those which simply test knowledge, is no guarantee of funding.

7.  SUMMARY

  7.1  The Association of Accounting Technicians fully supports the Government's stated objective of increasing the UK's skill levels and encouraging lifelong learning to ensure the UK's economy is competitive.

  7.2  Failure to focus on practical skills-based qualifications, ensure consistency between policy and implementation, improve accountability for delivery, address the problems of onerous regulation, raise the profile of skills based-qualifications and review the distribution of funding have the potential to undermine Government policy. Without a clear strategy, the Government will not achieve its laudable aim of improving the UK's skills base and the competitiveness of the UK's economy.

31 March 2004





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 31 March 2005