Select Committee on Education and Skills Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 120 - 124)

MONDAY 2 FEBRUARY 2004

MR MARK HAYSOM, MS CAROLINE NEVILLE AND MR DAVID CRAGG MBE

  Q120  Mr Pollard: Quickly, on careers guidance, it concerns me greatly that teaching staff who deal with this in schools might not be fully aware of all the opportunities available. How do we ensure that children at this critical time of their lives, when they are making really important decisions with their parents, get the right sort of advice, not just for them but for society, and are given the widest possible opportunities?

  Ms Neville: I agree with the point you are making. We are very concerned that every young person has access to the information, advice and guidance that they need to make the best decision for them. Now that may be through the Connexions personal adviser or very much through the staff and teachers within the school but, at the moment, the feedback that we are receiving suggests that there is a concern that not all people believe they are getting that impartial advice—and that is not being critical of any particular body. We have a really passionate commitment to meet the needs of every single young person, which might sound aspirational but I will repeat that it should be 100% for 100%, so if there is a group of young people and their parents who feel they are not getting the advice they need then we feel we want to work with others to look into that and put it right as quickly as we can.

  Q121  Mr Pollard: And valuing the vocational equally with the academic?

  Ms Neville: Absolutely.

  Q122  Mr Pollard: We cannot over-emphasise that, can we?

  Ms Neville: No. You are preaching to the converted.

  Mr Pollard: If a toilet blocks you want a plumber, not an astrophysicist!

  Q123  Chairman: Thank you. One point we have not touched on in any detail today is what is coming out of Tomlinson. This Committee has just come back from the United States and what we found in California is that one of the real tremendous problems was the poor state of their high school system, which really is in dreadful trouble. Now whether interesting things and exciting things happen in community colleges there is no doubt there are some real problems and some of us got the impression that if we were going to go, instead of GCSEs and A-levels—recognisable qualifications that stretch young peoples' minds and talents—to some overall qualification that everyone aspires to at 18 which has no particular standard to it then we would be very concerned, because it seemed to us that a lot of young people were getting high school certificates just by being there. Are you concerned about that?

  Mr Haysom: We would probably have to go to California to find out!

  Q124  Chairman: Without going to California, what does your team think?

  Ms Neville: Clearly standards need to be understood by all who are involved in delivery of diplomas and recognisable qualifications need to be included within that diploma. It is extremely important that employers and parents as well as the young people themselves understand what it is they are getting, the validity and currency of that qualification. We know from experience that moving to new and radical systems is difficult and will not be achieved overnight. This will require an enormous amount of work on behalf of everybody that is involved, not least of all within schools and colleges where we need to ensure that that support is there. There will be those who would resist change, but we believe that a coherent framework is the way to go. There will also be resource implications and we would want that recorded as well.

  Chairman: It seems to us that there a lot of the questions still to be asked, and I am minded to ask you to come back again, Mark, with your Chair before he retires because, with his experience over these four years, it will be very good to listen to what he has to say and reflect on his experience just before or just after he moves on, so we look forward to having you back again. An hour and fifteen minutes is really not long enough because you are really at the heart of our skills inquiry and we have not even touched on the role of the private sector, which is a growing sector in skills provision, so we look forward to the next innings. Thank you.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 31 March 2005