Select Committee on Education and Skills Minutes of Evidence


Memorandum submitted by the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA)

  1.  The Qualifications and Curriculum Authority welcomes the Committee's inquiry into the need to improve the national skills base through the national skills strategy. Vocational education and training is at the core of QCA's role. In particular, we would wish to contribute both to the debate on Government proposals for educational provision for 14-19-year-olds to meet this skills agenda, as well as the work of the Working Group on 14-19 reform.

  1.2  This paper focuses on key policy issues that are central to the success of the skills strategy. The paper positions the need for a coherent vocational offer that is understood by parents and young people, and the articulation of that offer with adult skills as central to the success of vocational reform. The paper does not repeat comment given in QCA's response to the Working Group (appended).[1]

2.  VOCATIONAL REFORM

  2.1  QCA is concerned that any implementation of the national skills strategy forms part of a coherent programme with other government initiatives. From our work with key partners such as LSC and SSDA, we fully understand the scope and complexity of reform required. The work of the 14-19 Reform Working Group is one, albeit critical, component. The impact of Sector Skills Councils is another.

  2.2  Employer training requirements differ significantly between sectors. Equally learners need different entry points into education and training at different times during their working lives. Reform must allow for a sophisticated and responsive framework that can adapt quickly to changing workplace needs. It is not sufficient of itself to reorganise the system of qualifications and examination across the 14-19 phase. Vocational learning, unless linked to occupational standards, will fail to deliver the depth and experience required for progression to employment.

3.  PUBLIC PERCEPTION

  3.1  The 14-19 Working Group has recognised that the current system is characterised by a weak vocational offer combined with an overly narrow academic track. We believe that long-term changes in public attitudes to vocational education and training as well as to the system itself are needed.

  3.2  The latter is being addressed within the education and training system on a number of fronts. Examples range across:

    —  Promotion of collaboration between schools and colleges

    —  More flexible types of qualifications that respond to employer needs

    —  Extending performance indicators (commonly called league tables) to include vocational qualifications.

  3.3  However vocational provision is not well understood in the 14-19 phase. Vocational courses are still often seen as more appropriate for less able learners. Despite the complex skills needs of the 23 employment sectors, vocational programmes need to be presented as a coherent offer relating to the world of employment, which parents can readily understand. For instance, many users are unclear about the workplace opportunities offered by an applied GCSE as distinct from other more occupationally focussed awards. Without clarity, vocational routes will never achieve the same recognition by both parents and employers as traditional examinations.

4.  ASSURING VOCATIONAL RELEVANCE

  4.1  There has been concern, reflected in reports from inspection and in employer comment, about the validity of some vocational provision, particularly when delivered by schools alone. It is not a question of standards. Effective vocational provision requires providers to have knowledge and experience of (and/or access to) the workplace.

  4.2  Expanding vocational education and training in schools brings with it a significant resource challenge that must be addressed—physical resources (such as equipment) and the experience/qualifications of staff. In the 14-19 phase, vocational delivery will need to have an increasingly secure engagement with the context, skill demands and experience of that sector or occupation. This will require more staff to be released for training than is currently the case. The work of Sector Skills Councils and the priorities they identify need to be reflected in the quality and content of careers advice as well as in work placements for staff and students.

  4.3  Expanding vocational education requires the creation of conditions to support robust partnerships across schools, colleges and the workplace. Issues of vocational authenticity and public perception can be addressed through sector engagement. Vocational delivery should be underpinned by the same professionalism that PGCE graduates bring to general provision.

5.  MODERN APPRENTICESHIPS

  5.1  Modern apprenticeships cover an increasing range of sectors and are developed by industry to meet skills needs. Many young people currently take modern apprenticeships at age 16. These provide a challenging programme of study with recognition and currency in a sector.

  5.2  As an example of the key points above, proposals for a 14-19 three level diploma must facilitate integration with modern apprenticeships. The LSC is in part addressing our concerns about school-based provision and modern apprenticeships through their work on "programme led" apprenticeships, whereby learners begin their apprenticeships whilst still in full-time education.

  5.3  QCA believes that coherence and flexibility within the 14-19 phase and its articulation with adult skills is critical. A diploma model with an authentic vocational offer could deliver aspects of the modern apprenticeship in school. Similarly, early school leavers could achieve a diploma through a work-based route and off the job training, from Connexions or via an Entry into Employment programme.

6.  A COHERENT NATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORK

  6.1  Finally, to meet the challenge of the skills strategy, we suggest that all qualifications, including higher education, should be embedded within a single overarching framework for recognising achievement. This framework with consistent technical design features (for example credit, levels and units) would support transparency, achievement, transfer and progression across learning phases. It would be a key condition for presenting vocational learning and skills as a coherent offer across different phases.

15 December 2003





1   Not printed. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 31 March 2005