Select Committee on Education and Skills Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 80-87)

MR DAVID BELL, MRS MIRIAM ROSEN, MR ROBERT GREEN, MR MAURICE SMITH AND MR JONATHAN THOMPSON

16 MARCH 2005

  Q80 Chairman: Last question, Jonathan Thompson. One thing puzzles me. If someone said to me in my constituency or in the media or wherever "You are supposed to check on Ofsted, aren't you, as the Select Committee? What are its finances like?" how do we know that someone is not putting lots of money in a Swiss bank account or that there is not a precarious Enron situation going on? How would I know that?

  Mr Thompson: You would know that, Chairman, by the reports of the National Audit Office. We are audited by the National Audit Office and produce an annual report that goes to an audit committee, which is chaired by a non-executive director, who challenges all five of us about particular issues and is publicly available.

  Q81 Chairman: What is the situation? Is it a good financial situation? You are saving all this money, you are building up balances. The taxpayer will be able to get some back soon, surely?

  Mr Thompson: The taxpayer is reducing, if you like, the amount of money that we have available. Forty-two million pounds is the savings target we have to reach. The situation at the moment is that we are well above £30 million but we still have some further work to do to reach the full savings target.

  Q82 Chairman: That is genuine savings? It is not robbing Peter to pay Paul, putting a bit back in the DfES, putting a bit over here, sending some off to Bristol?

  Mr Thompson: The real situation is that we need to reduce our costs from over £220 million down to £192 million, so there is real cash saving, but quite what happens to that is obviously not a matter for us.

  Q83 Chairman: Do you consider your organisation a well paid profession? Are you well remunerated?

  Mr Thompson: I am very happy with my own remuneration.

  Q84 Chairman: Not just the chiefs—what about the Indians? Let me just give you an example of why I asked the question. Does it not embarrass some of your inspectors when they go to early years settings and you do a report and you have early years people there on very little, minimum wage, not very much training, on tiny salaries, yet they are looking after the most precious commodity or resource of our country, our little children? It must be embarrassing for someone on an Ofsted salary to actually go to those settings and see those people working a long day, doing a wonderful job, on tiny salaries. Does that worry you?

  Mr Smith: Yes. The relationship between the pay of the inspector and the pay of the staff whom they are inspecting is an interesting insight.

  Q85 Chairman: It is dramatic, is it not?

  Mr Smith: There is also quite a differential between the pay of different inspectors, and that is a very interesting challenge for us as an organisation. I think you might be surprised at the pay rates of child care inspectors.

  Q86 Chairman: That does not impress me very much, in that you have not answered the question about how you feel about the quality of pay in early years settings.

  Mr Smith: The pay for the most junior staff in early years settings, particularly in the private and voluntary sector, is often set at minimum wage.

  Q87 Chairman: We will finish on that note. Chief inspector, any last word before you go?

  Mr Bell: Thank you very much, Chairman, for treating us so courteously again this morning.

  Chairman: God willing and the electorate compliant, we hope to see you again soon.







 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 10 June 2005