Select Committee on Environmental Audit First Report


FOREWORD


The urgent need for new housing, if met with undue haste and an absence of thorough environmental appraisals, will lead to significant and effectively irreversible environmental damage. The Report which follows contains many specific recommendations and conclusions, and summarises a significant amount of evidence. Its bottom line is that Government, both local and national, and all those engaged in planning and building new housing, have simply got to raise their game or the environmental consequences will be severe and long term.

The significant drop in building rates, which has been a reality since the 1960's, is mainly a result of a dramatic reduction in the construction of local authority housing, which has not been compensated for by an increase in the numbers of privately built homes. The introduction to the Sustainable Communities Plan noted "that private housebuilding has failed to rise to the demand for owner-occupied property, and too many large homes are being built when the new demand is mainly for small households. In recent years more than one in three homes built in the South East have been larger, four bedroom houses". Whilst we accept the real need to address the problem of housing affordability in some parts of the country, together with the impact of a reduced provision in social housing - and we likewise accept that this will necessarily mean building new homes - we are concerned about the potential environmental impacts associated with housing growth. We are also concerned about how the increased pressure on private house builders to meet housing demand will affect standards, particularly environmental standards, of construction. This concern is deepened in the light of the conclusion from the Barker Review that the current rate of private house building in England may need to be nearly doubled to reduce house price inflation.

It is surely better to build sustainable housing for sustainable communities slowly, prudently and well than to put up poorly considered, planned, designed and constructed housing, which may solve an immediate problem but which will only lead to longer term difficulties in the future. Gradual, careful construction of sustainable housing is vital if we are to operate within environmental limits. With this in mind we have identified the issues that it is imperative the Government address as it carries forward its housing agenda:

  • Infrastructure provision must run concurrently with housing construction and not follow it, or fail to materialise at all;
  • There have to be minimal carbon emissions during both the construction of new housing and during its lifetime use;
  • New housing must be durable, built to last from sustainable, recycled or recyclable, and - where possible - locally sourced materials. Funding must be made available for the research to ensure this becomes increasingly possible.
  • New housing should be constructed to higher average densities than at present, whilst maximising the use of available brownfield sites;
  • House builders have to be made to improve their performance across the board, to accept innovation and more stringent regulations for ensuring higher quality housing;
  • The skills base and environmental awareness of planners, architects, builders and all those involved in planning and construction needs to improve;
  • Local and regional planning decisions for new housing should be made by elected bodies, answerable to all those who live in or around the areas to be affected;
  • A National Spatial Framework for England should be drawn up to challenge the assumptions that currently favour over-development in the east and south-east and under-development in the north and west; and
  • The environmental principles within sustainable development must be better understood by local authorities, by developers and the construction industry, and by national government - and their importance taken to heart.

Environmental impacts are not always immediately obvious and often long term in effect, whilst the immediacy of economic, even social, benefits too often and too easily outweigh them when they should not. To counter this, DEFRA needs to push its own role in Government in terms of the new Sustainable Development Strategy, and ODPM and HM Treasury both need to engage more fully with DEFRA in terms of their own aims and priorities. This is currently not happening, and the environment will suffer from this failure to join up government. In the case of climate change the threats are obvious and imminent and unless significant efforts are made to reduce emissions from the housing sector they could constitute over 55% of the UK's target for carbon emissions by 2050.

The environmental impacts of the proposed increase in house building deserve much greater consideration than they have yet received from Government. Whilst we accept the need to improve housing supply, we believe that housing policy should be set within the overarching context of environmental limits. All new housing should be built to standards that minimise environmental impacts. There is a serious risk that, as matters stand, the principal beneficiaries of housing growth will be property development companies, whilst the principal loser will be the environment.

Large scale house building demands prudence, properly joined-up government, thorough environmental appraisals, a respect of environmental limits, local engagement, and improvements in skills, knowledge and awareness. We need sustainable communities and new sustainable housing, but unless they are environmentally sustainable they will never be truly sustainable at all.



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 31 January 2005