Select Committee on Environmental Audit Written Evidence


APPENDIX 26

Memorandum from Policy Studies Institute

  In the Memorandum (largely based on our book How we can save the planet *) for the Environmental Audit Committee's Inquiry, The International Challenge of Climate Change, we concluded that the Global Commons Institute's Contraction and Convergence framework offered the only political feasible and morally justifiable strategy that provides an assured solution to the awesome problems posed particularly by the affluent world population's continuing profligacy in fossil fuel use.

  We pointed to the urgency with which procrastination on this critical issue must be ended. To accelerate such a course of action, we highlighted the imperative of informing the public, politicians and industrialists on:

    —  the case for Contraction and Convergence; and

    —  its manifestation in the form of per capita carbon rationing;

  In our view, an understanding of the elements of carbon rationing is essential to enabling individuals to audit their own carbon emissions and, in that way, to appreciate:

    —  the extent to which these emissions exceed their fair share of this commodity (set by the finite capacity of the planetary atmosphere to absorb the emissions without severe climatic instability);

    —  the courses of action that must be taken to lower the emissions to that equitable level.

  In Chapter eight of our book, we set out a simple auditing process—see the Annex to this Memorandum—and action that can be taken to achieve both of the above ends. The completion of a personal audit are likely to have both a cathartic and energising effect. We see this as essential to an appreciation of the gravity of continuing with lifestyles dependent on too much energy use and of the changes to them that must come in the wake of this.

  * Mayer Hillman and Tina Fawcett, How we can save the planet, Penguin Books, 2004. ISBN 0-141-01692-2

  As part of a programme of "education for sustainable development", we therefore urge the Committee to consider incorporating this process into the school curriculum in order to promote the imperative of understanding on the subject. We consider that "sustainability" is too loose a term for it to be meaningful in coming to terms with the reality of the impact on the environment of the lifestyle of each individual—and therefore responsibility for taking steps to limit emissions to the safe level that does not exceed their fair share of "the global commons".

December 2004

Annex

AUDIT YOUR CARBON EMISSIONS

  We invite you to calculate your own emissions—it does not take long—and then enter into a pact with yourself and your household to reduce them. What are the emissions from your use of energy? How do these compare with the national average? More importantly, how do they compare with what is necessary to meet future reduction targets—three tonnes by 2020 and 1.5 tonnes by 2030?

INSTRUCTIONS FOR CARRYING OUT YOUR CARBON AUDIT

    —  For the gas, electricity and oil used in your home, calculate your annual consumption in kilowatt hours (kWh) from your energy bills. Divide each total by the number of people in your household, to get your personal energy consumption.

    —  For transport, roughly estimate your own annual travel in kilometres (for miles multiply by 1.6)—it is not necessary to be precise.

    —  Put these figures for YOUR annual consumption in the table below. Then use the multiplier in the next column to get the figure for YOUR carbon dioxide emissions in kilograms (kgCO2).

    —  Add up your emissions from all your different activities to get an annual figure, and then compare this for the average individual and with your ration in future years.


  By 2020, a return flight from London to New York alone will exceed the annual personal ration for all your fossil fuel purposes!


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 5 April 2005