Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Supplementary memorandum submitted by the Association of Electricity Producers (U29a)

Supplementary questions arising from oral evidence given to EFRA Committee Inquiry "Climate Change—Looking Forward"

Q 138.  Perhaps you might just be able to quantify for us what you think is the target of CO2 emissions that we have to deal with, particularly to bring us back onto the government's target, how much of that you think you could contribute and, ballpark figure, what has to be dealt with by the rest.

  A.  In its Consultation Paper on the UK Climate Change Programme Review, the Government suggests that CO2 reductions of 14% from 1990 levels will be achieved by 2010, thus falling short of the national goal of 20%. The 14% reduction assumes full delivery of policy measures; a figure of 12% would probably be more realistic.

  Switching from coal to gas, growth in renewables generation and the building of new nuclear capacity all offer the prospect of reduced CO2 emissions in the electricity sector in the longer term. However, none of these options offers the potential to put UK CO2 emissions back on target by 2010. This is because a) based on current forward prices for coal and gas, the price of CO2 allowances would need to rise above

20 per tonne to drive the decision to switch, b) it would take more than a decade for sufficient new gas-fired, renewable or nuclear generation to be brought on line and c) it would run counter to policies that have already encouraged operators to invest heavily in other technologies, such as FGD. The Updated Energy Projections published by DTI in November 2004 show a reduction of coal-fired generation from 116 TWh to 90 TWh between 2005 and 2010; even that may prove to be ambitious if gas prices remain high.

  These observations suggest that there is no merit in a knee-jerk reaction to the failure to reach the national goal for CO2 reductions in 2010. Instead, the Government should focus on measures that are consistent with achieving its long-term objectives for climate change mitigation. It is clear from the above that this will require the engagement of other sectors, including transport and domestic (households).

Q 170.  One final question to you, which you do not have to answer now. We have heard a lot of information from both groups, but perhaps you could just jot down on the back of the proverbial envelope or postcard, the one thing that the government should be doing that would help to get it back on track to meeting the target that it set itself.

  A.  The Government needs to look beyond seeking short-term emission reductions from the Power Generation Sector towards the implementation of a broad suite of measures that will encourage other sectors to contribute to moving towards the UK's long-term goal of 60% reduction of CO2 emissions by 2050. Government must develop a better understanding of what is both technically and economically achievable across all sectors if it is to develop a credible and coherent policy framework.

12 January 2005






 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 5 April 2005