Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Eighth Report


7 Conclusion

119. Despite the best endeavours of our witnesses, we have been left, at the end of this inquiry, feeling frustrated at the lack of information available on crucial issues that would have assisted us in reaching our conclusions. In particular, we have been forced to conduct our investigations in the absence of:

  • firm and final plans from the Government on its national pesticides strategy
  • real proof of any environmental benefits that have resulted from the VI
  • detailed results from the Government's research project that was designed specifically to provide tools for evaluating the environmental benefits of the VI
  • adequate time-series data on water quality
  • a definitive estimate of the annual cost of removing pesticides contamination from drinking water, and
  • a fully worked-up proposal from HM Treasury on its preferred design for a possible pesticides tax.

Most of the items listed above are the responsibility of the Government. Some of them—particularly the national pesticides strategy and the research into tools for evaluating the VI—have been promised for several years. We consider it vital that the Government now make significant progress with its strategic approach to the sustainable use of pesticides and show a clear commitment to prioritise pesticides issues. Such a commitment is necessary to help allay the public concerns that surround the use of pesticides. We are frustrated at the lack of effort being made to devise a means of measuring progress made by policies intended to control pesticide use. The Government is still struggling to develop an appropriate benchmarking exercise or baseline position against which to judge its pesticide policies.

120. Defra believes it must constantly challenge the targets that the VI has set for itself.[237] The Minister told us this approach was necessary to push the VI to achieve "continual improvement" that will be "convincing to others".[238] Exerting pressure on the VI to deliver results that are convincing to those outside the agricultural and agrochemical industry is very important. The process of parliamentary scrutiny can help those involved in the initiative avoid a sense of complacency, as the VI enters the final year of its programme. We may wish to return to this issue in the future. If we do, we expect to find not only that the Government has finalised its national pesticides strategy, but that it has taken decisive steps towards achieving widespread implementation of the strategy.


237   Qq 318, 321, 326 Back

238   Qq 321, 334 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 5 April 2005