Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by Helen Bower (Z29)

  1.  Significant progress has been made because elements of the Voluntary Initiative have been incorporated into the Assured Products schemes and protocols. This gives added weight to the initiative but also assures take up of the elements regarding pesticide choice and application.

  2.  The National Register of Spray Operators has also ensured, because it incorporates an in-service ongoing training requirement that operators are kept up to date with current practice in selection and application of products.

  3.  There has been, due to the review of pesticides programme, a much-reduced choice of pesticide and agrochemical available to the grower. This has not only weeded out duplications of product but also the ones whose approval may not have succeeded because of environmental or efficacy concerns.

  4.  Consequently the value of a Pesticide Tax or indeed the need for such a tax is diluted as:

    (a)  The revenue and

    (b)  The number of products it could be applied to is reduced

  5.  Environmental considerations and alternatives that form part of the VI and the BASIS appraisals form a valid argument against the implementation of such a tax and could draw down criticism that it was being introduced purely for cosmetic or for PR consideration.

8 October 2004





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 5 April 2005