Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Fifth Report


5  The successor body to the Countryside Agency

Establishment

46. In line with the Rural Strategy, in April 2005 Defra will assume responsibility for all rural policy development and the Countryside Agency's rural regeneration work will be transferred to the Regional Development Agencies. Resources to support the rural voluntary and community sector will largely be administered by the Government Offices for the Regions. At the same time, the Countryside Agency's environmental, landscape, access and recreational division will come together with English Nature and the Rural Development Service, which will also be included in the future Integrated Agency. [86]

47. The Commission for Rural Communities was established as a distinct body within the Countryside Agency's legal framework on 9 March 2005.[87] The Government's aim is to put the new Integrated Agency and the changes to the Countryside Agency on a statutory footing by 2007, subject to the parliamentary timetable for primary legislation.[88] The Minister noted that the Commission for Rural Communities would be an independent non-departmental public body and that its role would be "to assess whether government policy and government actions are making a real difference on the ground in rural areas and particularly to focus on disadvantage in rural areas".[89]

Role

48. The role of the Commission for Rural Communities will be as advocate, expert adviser and independent watchdog:

49. The Government's proposals for a successor to the Countryside Agency attracted less attention from witnesses than the plans for the Integrated Agency. It seems that, once the case for abolishing the Countryside Agency completely was rejected, there were fewer areas of concern regarding the future for its successor. However, some specific issues about how the independence of the successor body would be assured were raised in evidence on the draft NERC Bill. We address these in Chapter 12 below.

Resources

50. We also heard concerns about the funding of the new body. CRE stressed that "the Government must ensure that the new Countryside Agency is sufficiently resourced to carry out its policy advice, research, advocacy and rural proofing roles properly and on an England-wide basis".[91] In the Rural Strategy, the Government admitted that "the detailed size, design and organisation of the New Countryside Agency has yet to be determined", but went on to suggest that it will have a budget of "something approaching £10 million".[92] The Countryside Agency was keen for the CRC to have "sufficient resources to be able to be seen as expert and authoritative".[93]

51. During our scrutiny of the draft NERC Bill, the Government was able to give us slightly more information about how the budget of the new body would be worked out. The Director of Defra's Modernising Rural Delivery Programme confirmed the £10 million figure, and agreed that the obvious starting point for the CRC's budget would be the existing budget for those activities being transferred to it. But she hoped that, in practice, budgets would be worked out from the bottom up: "these are the things that we think we need to deliver and this is what it will cost". There would then be funding negotiations with Defra on this basis.[94]

Rural proofing and the role of the Rural Advocate

52. Evidence noted the important role of the Countryside Agency, and its successor, in ensuring the 'rural proofing' of Government activity. The Countryside Agency defined 'rural proofing' as:

… thinking about whether a policy will have any significant differential impacts in rural areas. It aims to encourage government departments and others to 'think rural' by taking account of the characteristics and needs of the countryside when making and implementing policies.[95]

53. The Countryside Agency thought that "the increased devolution of delivery and implementation of policies to regional and local level makes it even more important that rural proofing is embedded at all levels of government—national, regional and local".[96] Defra noted that it takes the lead role in government on rural proofing policy, but added that the work of the Countryside Agency would be carried on by its successor, which would "monitor and challenge government at all levels, checking that rural proofing is being done, and is delivering results for rural communities and people".[97]

54. The Countryside Agency initially told us that the legislation establishing its successor "should provide a general duty on all government departments and public bodies to reflect rural equity in their relevant policies and activities. That will increase the ability to audit and rural-proof public bodies' policy making—a core role of the New Countryside Agency".[98] However, in his evidence on the draft NERC Bill, the Chairman of the Countryside Agency accepted that this might be difficult to enshrine in statute. He argued however that they had got "the next best thing": assurances that the Government was committed to rural proofing and would continue to take it very seriously. An example of this was the fact that rural proofing was now included as part of the Regulatory Impact Assessment process.[99] The Local Government Association also made the point that rural proofing should apply to regional and local government, as well as central Government departments.[100] (Specific concerns about the wording of the relevant part of the draft Bill are addressed in Chapter 12 below.)

55. The Prime Minister has appointed the Chairman of the Countryside Agency as the Rural Advocate. The draft Bill does not make formal provision for the Chair of the new CRC to be the Rural Advocate. However, the Policy Statement accompanying the draft Bill does state that the Chair of the Commission will be the Rural Advocate. The Countryside Agency welcomed this "explicit commitment".[101] The LGA, on the other hand, felt that the role of the Rural Advocate was not stated as firmly as it might be.[102]

56. The Minister reassured us that the new CRC would continue the rural-proofing function of the CA, and that in this respect nothing had changed. He agreed it would have a role in rural proofing across Government, outside the Defra remit as necessary.[103] He also explained that the role of Rural Advocate was not a statutory function, and for this reason was not mentioned in the draft NERC Bill. The intention "under the present Prime Minister" was that the Chair of the CRC would be designated as the Rural Advocate, but the Government had not wanted to "tie the hands of everybody" by putting this commitment on a more formal basis.[104]

Definition of 'rural'

57. This Committee has previously recommended that the Countryside Agency "make its highest priority to define what a 'rural' area is, and seek to ensure that other Departments and Agencies and other public bodies adopt the same definition".[105] The Countryside Agency acknowledged our earlier interest in this area and referred us to the results of a collaborative exercise involving the Agency itself, the Office for National Statistics, Defra, the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister and the National Assembly for Wales.[106]

58. The new definition of urban and rural areas that resulted from the project was summarised as follows: "If you live in something which is a reasonably cohesive urban settlement of more than 10,000 population, you are not rural; if you live in other areas, you are generally classified as rural".[107] The Countryside Agency felt the new rural definition was "a step forward in being able to assess the delivery of key services to rural areas and will prove useful in monitoring the effectiveness of rural proofing".[108]

59. We welcome the fact that the Countryside Agency is not to be abolished. There is a continuing need for an expert policy adviser and rural watchdog. This important role must be recognised by the Government and its activities funded accordingly. It is vital that the expertise developed by the Agency is not lost during the restructuring process. We expect the new Commission for Rural Communities to have sufficient resources, influence and independence to act as an effective champion of rural issues across the whole of Government. The CRC should seek to ensure the 'rural proofing' of all levels of Government which are engaged in rural delivery and highlight cases of both poor as well as good practice.

60. The role of Rural Advocate is a vital one and we welcome the commitment that the Chairman of the CRC will be the Rural Advocate. To be effective, the Rural Advocate needs proper back-up, and we would be very concerned at any suggestion that the role should be detached from the CRC.


86   "Rural Delivery Review Frequently Asked Questions", Defra website, November 2004, www.defra.gov.uk Back

87   Q 419 Back

88   Q 584 Back

89   Q 280 Back

90   Ev 58. See Ev 70 for diagram of the New Countryside Agency. Back

91   Ev 11 Back

92   Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Rural Strategy 2004, pp 22-23 Back

93   Q 184 Back

94   Qq 577-78 Back

95   Ev 58 [footnote] Back

96   Ev 58 [emphasis in original] Back

97   "Rural Delivery Review Frequently Asked Questions", Defra website, November 2004, www.defra.gov.uk Back

98   Ev 61; Appendix 12, para 15 Back

99   Qq 415-17, 426 Back

100   Q 448 Back

101   Appendix 12, para 9 Back

102   Q 448 Back

103   Qq 557-58 Back

104   Q 556 Back

105   Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee, Second Report of Session 2001-02, The Countryside Agency, HC 386, para 12 Back

106   The Countryside Agency, The new definition of urban and rural areas of England and Wales, CRN 86, September 2004 Back

107   Q 193 [Mr Wakeford] Back

108   Ev 71 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 26 March 2005