Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Memorandum submitted by the Environment Agency (Appendix 18)

SUMMARY

  The Environment Agency is the leading public body responsible for protecting and improving the environment in England and Wales. This memorandum sets out our position on the Draft Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill and in particular proposals to create a new Integrated Agency for the delivery of aspects of the Government's rural policy.

  Our key points are:

    —  We welcome the proposal to create the new Integrated Agency (IA) as an important partner to help us protect and enhance the environment.

    —  The final name for the IA must communicate its role to the public and its partners and avoid confusion with the Environment Agency. We suggest English Landscape and Nature (ELAN).

    —  It is vital that the IA has a clear and distinctive set of purposes which do not unnecessarily overlap or cause confusion with those of the Environment Agency.

    —  We believe statutory guidance should be given to the IA. This guidance and the management statement to be issued should set out the relationship between the IA and the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, the framework within which the IA will operate and other guidance relevant to the exercise of its functions. It should also set out its relationship with the Environment Agency and other statutory bodies. This transparency and accountability will benefit the organisations concerned, stakeholders and customers alike.

    —  The management statement should be kept under review and should set out the government's priorities, including the use of incentive payments to protect and enhance natural resources. We would expect to be statutory consultees on any statutory guidance and also consulted on the management statement.

    —  We stress that powers delegated by the Secretary of State to and between Defra family bodies must only be delegated by mutual consent as provided for in the Bill. We would expect resources to follow delegated functions.

    —  We welcome the plans for the new Inland Waterways Advisory Council, but believe it should have a primary duty to further sustainable development.

    —  We welcome the proposals to strengthen species and habitat arrangements. We would also recommend our flood defence byelaws be extended to include conservation powers and that in line with proposed amendments for other legislation, the period within which proceedings for the enforcement of byelaws may start be extended to a maximum period of two years from the time the offence was committed.

    —  We welcome proposals for the Broads Authority to operate a Boat Safety Scheme and associated measures to bring the Broads in line with those operated by other navigation authorities such as the Environment Agency.

1.  INTRODUCTION

  1.1  The Environment Agency is the leading public body responsible for protecting and improving the environment in England and Wales. We advise Government on sustainable development, work with the prospective organisations which will make up the IA and have a central role in delivering the Government's Rural Strategy. We therefore have a direct interest in the Draft Bill and wish to ensure that the legislation is drafted and implemented to deliver the necessary environmental protection as efficiently and effectively as possible.

  1.2  We already work closely with the constituent bodies of the IA. For example, we work in close partnership with English Nature on delivering enhanced protection for wildlife sites of EU importance as the competent authority for Habitats Regulations. We work with the Rural Development Service on the targeting and design of agri-environment schemes and advice to farmers. We work with all three bodies as part of the Land Use Planning Group on land use research and EU policy.

  1.3  In the future, the Water Framework Directive, for which the Environment Agency is the competent authority, sustainable flood risk management and sustainable farming will all be key issues on which the IA and Environment Agency will need to work together.

  1.4  Of the above challenges, the biggest is to tackle diffuse pollution from agriculture on a catchment-wide basis. Tackling this challenge is central to meeting our obligations under the Water Framework Directive. We are currently trialling with English Nature and the Rural Development Service, catchment management projects which will bring together the range of measures available, together with specialist officers who can co-ordinate effort round catchments most at risk and provide advice to farmers.

2.  MAIN POINTS

  2.1  We welcome the proposal to create the new Integrated Agency (IA). The draft Bill proposes to unite in a single organisation the responsibility for enhancing biodiversity and our landscapes in both rural and urban areas, promoting access, recreation and public well-being, and thereby contributing to integrated natural resource management. The IA will be a valuable partner to complement our role in environmental protection and the improvement of soil, air and water.

  2.2  The name for the new Agency must communicate its role clearly and distinctively to the public and its partners but avoid confusion with the Environment Agency. The new name must reflect the IA's roles and responsibilities, so that the public and those that work with it understand what it does. Our suggestion for such a name is English Landscape and Nature (ELAN) reflecting the principal functions of the new body.

  2.3  The IA must have clear and distinctive purposes which do not unnecessarily overlap with those of the Environment Agency, but which enable it to use its powers to work with us to protect and enhance the environment. The Environment Agency's functions include the protection and enhancement of natural resources (air, land and water), and other statutory functions including flood risk management, water resources management, fisheries, conservation and navigation. We also have a statutory duty to promote recreation and sport on or near inland and coastal waters and have been tasked by the Minister with taking the lead in strategic planning for water-related recreation and sport. The roles of the new Agency should be as set out in 2.1 above, as laid down in the draft Bill. The two bodies will need to work closely together to protect and enhance the natural environment and contribute to sustainable development. We believe the general purposes as drafted in the Bill will help us to deliver this, but further guidance will be needed to provide an effective operational framework. Each body needs clear and distinctive primary roles, but also a duty to contribute through its roles, to supporting the other.

  2.4  Statutory guidance should be issued to the IA which must make it clear that the IA and ourselves should work together and that the IA should use its powers to support the Environment Agency's work on the protection and enhancement of natural resources. The more detailed arrangements for working together should then be determined by the two bodies within this high-level framework. It should support the use of incentive payments to protect and enhance natural resources and to enhance water quality. It could also identify further government policies which the IA and the Environment Agency could deliver together. As we will be responsible along with the IA for delivering a number of Defra's environmental objectives we recommend that we are statutory consultees on any statutory guidance which should be kept under review.

  2.5  We welcome the proposal that powers delegated by the Secretary of State to and between Defra family bodies will only be delegated by mutual consent. Delegation of functions can provide flexibility in delivery. However this must not undermine the purpose of the Environment Agency which was specifically established to bring together protection of soil, air and water. Delegation of any part of this could risk the benefits of tackling the protection and enhancement of all three media together. Powers must be delegated only by mutual consent and where a function is appropriate to the purpose of the bodies involved, as the draft bill provides. We also expect funding to follow the delegation of functions.

  2.6  We also welcome the proposal that the new Inland Waterways Advisory Council will have independence from British Waterways. We recommend that membership should be open to a wide range of relevant interests, including environmental interests. It should have a primary duty to further sustainable development, to ensure that its advice to all 29 operating navigation authorities across the country take account of the environmental as well as economic and social issues. This will help improve the quality of navigation for all waterway users.

  2.7  We are pleased with the proposals to strengthen species and habitat arrangements, but would also like to see these widened to include modifications to our flood defence byelaw powers. These modifications would enable us to grant consent subject to conditions relating to conservation or to refuse consent on conservation grounds. (The current provisions are limited to "securing the efficient working of the drainage system", which runs contrary to our statutory duties in relation to nature conservation.) In line with the provisions set out in the draft Bill in relation to other Acts, we would also recommend that the period within which we may start proceedings for the enforcement of byelaws be extended to a period within six months beginning with the date on which sufficient evidence to warrant proceedings came to the attention of the prosecutor, subject to a maximum period of two years from the time the offence was committed. At present we are restricted to commencing proceedings within six months of the offence being committed.

  2.8  We also welcome the proposals for the Broads Authority to operate a Boat Safety Scheme which should co-ordinate with the existing scheme operated by the Environment Agency and British Waterways. This will improve the safety and enjoyment of those using the Broads for recreation. The measures would bring the Broads navigation in line with those operated by other navigation authorities, including the Environment Agency and British Waterways Board.

3.  CONCLUSION

  3.1  The Environment Agency welcomes the Draft Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill and in particular the creation of the new Integrated Agency.

  3.2  With clarity of name, purpose and working relationship with ourselves, we believe the new Agency can work closely with us in delivering the Government's environmental priorities.

Environment Agency

February 2005





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 4 April 2005