Memorandum submitted by the West Wales'
Fife Fancy Canary Club
The main purpose of this bill is to bring together
and modernise legislation that exists to promote the welfare of
vertebrate animals and this must be welcomed. Uncertainty and
differing opinions within Local Authorities has led to much confusion.
However, the proposals to licence events where vertebrate animals
are sold will have an effect on the fancy that many small clubs
will cease to exist. Exhibitions which also have birds for sale
are the very place where breeders can meet and exchange or purchase
livestock to maintain their stud. These events are arranged by
experienced breeders/exhibitors with stewards to control and ensure
animal welfare of the exhibits.
The proposals to licence such events is unnecessary,
it will not be viable for smaller clubs to pay for a licence on
each occasion and this will see the hobby into further decline.
The guidance provided by Knights solicitors and the Parrot society
has not fully recognised the implications of the proposed legislation
on the fancy as a whole.
Before considering such legislation the Working
Group should have consulted those directly affected to ascertain
a clear picture. It is obvious that the representation on the
advisory group does not reflect the various aspects of bird keeping,
let alone the other interests from associated hobbies.
More extensive consultation is required on any
future Codes of Practice and conditions to be attached to any
licence granted. It would be in the best interest of all small
livestock and all parties concerned, for legislation to be passed
in which the true nature of these events is:
(c) Realistically and fairly regulated.
It is recommended that shows/exhibitions/fairs
are declared perfectly lawful, subject where necessary to the
issue of individual licence by the appropriate Local Authority.
The issuing authority remit should be restricted to :
(a) The suitability of the venue for such
an event.
(b) The suitability of the organiser.
(c) An authority for appropriate officers
of the licensing body to satisfy themselves of the proper conduct
of the event.
The presence of a veterinary surgeon is a matter
for the large commercial events and would impose a dire financial
burden on smaller clubs.
I would urge greater consultation and publicity
to ensure that the main aims of this legislation are achieved
and clarity prevails.
August 2004
| 
