Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by the Game Farmers' Association

  1.  The GFA represents members throughout the UK who rear gamebirds (mainly pheasants and partridges) for release into the wild to supplement wild stocks used in sporting shooting.

  2.  We have supported the concept of a proper Animal Welfare Bill from the outset and Defra officials have met with us on several occasions and have visited member's game farms during their work on the Bill. As a result, we believe the current draft is a reasonable starting point.

  3.  We are concerned, however, that aspects of the Bill are very vague and leave much to interpretation by the courts. Because game farming has its opponents, there is a big risk of malicious prosecutions and the final text of the Bill must ensure that offences are sufficiently clearly defined to avert the risk of innocent game farmers being prosecuted.

  4.  The Government's intention, stated in the papers accompanying the Draft Animal Welfare Bill, is that game farming should in future be regulated by a Defra-approved Code of Practice issued under the Bill.

  5.  We welcome this approach and in particular the intention, also clearly stated in the papers, that such a code should be based on the exiting Code for Game Rearing first published by our Association in 1999.

  6.  Our Code (latest edition 2003) originally drew from the Government's own Poultry Health Scheme is already widely followed and has stood the test of time. It is practical and reasonable and has been praised by Government and the veterinary profession. The absence of any welfare prosecutions of game farmers since its launch suggest that the code is working.

  7.  The Government has a manifesto commitment not to restrict shooting in any way, so we ask the EFRA Committee to recommend that our code be adopted without material change. If this can be done, we believe game farming practice and animal welfare will both be well served.

  8.  It is important that in transposing the GFA Code no alterations or additions are made without taking into account the views of the industry. In our view there is no reason why the GFA Code should not be adopted as the basis for a Defra-approved code unaltered.

  9.  The Draft Bill would confer a right for inspectors to enter and examine game farms and other places where gamebirds are kept. This would be a new departure and we support the idea as bringing game farming into line with other farming sectors.

  10.  We have strong views, however, about who should be allowed to make such inspections. Our first preference would be the State Veterinary Service or, failing that, a system based on inspection by our own vets, who are visiting anyway during the rearing season.

  11.  We are concerned that the Draft Bill could allow Local Authorities to appoint unsuitable individuals and organisations as inspectors. In this context the Secretary of State's guidance to Local Authorities on who might make a suitable inspector is crucial. It should be subject to proper Parliamentary scrutiny.

13 August 2004





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 9 December 2004