Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by the Guide Dogs for the Blind Association

  The Guide Dogs for the Blind Association is the largest breeder and trainer of assistance dogs in the world, caring for up to 5,000 qualified guide dogs, 1,200 trainee guide dogs, and 1,500 puppies at any one time. As a leading expert in dog care, welfare, and canine research, we would like to put forward our comments on a number of clauses contained within the Bill which relate directly to our own policies, practices and procedures.

CLAUSE 1—CRUELTY

  Guide Dogs has stringent health and welfare policies in place for all our dogs, and strictly prohibits the use of shock-training tactics or devices. Any breach of this policy by clients or staff results in the withdrawal of the guide dog, or instant dismissal.

  We are deeply concerned by the common use of electric shock collars by pet owners and trainers. We believe that as a shock collar is intended to train a dog to suppress undesirable behaviour out of fear of further punishment, it causes unnecessary pain and distress to the animal. As such, we believe that the provisions contained within this clause do not go far enough to protect against cruelty to animals, and call upon the Committee to recommend an outright ban on the sale and use of shock collars.

CLAUSE 3—WELFARE

  We support the proposals contained within this clause to protect an animal's welfare. We do however feel that further clarification is needed to determine "reasonableness" with regard to steps taken to ensure the animal's welfare. We are concerned that the Courts would not have sufficient expertise to determine what actions were or were not reasonable, and therefore ask the Committee to recommend that provisions be made within the Bill to enable Ministers to appoint suitable advisors to the Courts. We believe that guidelines should also be drawn up to advise them on this process, which we would expect to be subject to consultation with relevant organisations and individuals at draft stage.

CLAUSE 4—SALE TO PERSONS UNDER 16

  We do not agree that a person's ability to care properly for an animal can be determined by virtue of age and therefore do not support this clause.

  As I am sure you are aware, the core service of Guide Dogs is to provide mobility to blind and partially sighted people through guide dog partnerships. The characteristics of each partnership—trust, companionship, and independence—is underpinned by the sense of ownership and responsibility for the dog that we give to each guide dog owner. Our number of partnerships currently stands at around 5,000, and it is our aim to provide this very special form of mobility assistance to as many blind and partially sighted people as possible.

  We currently "sell" our guide dogs to their owner for a nominal fee of 50p, and are very concerned that prohibiting the sale of animals to under-16 year olds would in future prevent us from reaching young blind and partially sighted people through the guide dog service. At the very least, we would like to seek an exemption for the "sale" of guide dogs to young people under 16 years old, and for this purpose supply the following definition of a guide dog used by our organisation:

    "A guide dog is a dog trained to provide mobility assistance to a blind or partially sighted person. In the UK the guide dog is trained, assessed and accredited by The Guide Dogs for the Blind Association. Outside the UK a guide dog is a dog trained by an individual or organisation that is accepted by and affiliated to the International Guide Dog Federation."

CLAUSE 6—REGULATIONS TO PROMOTE WELFARE

  We note that the draft Bill makes provisions for regulations to be made with respect to the accommodation of animals. We would request that when the time comes, a rigorous regulatory and economic impact assessment be carried out, which takes into account the financial limitations of charities and other caring organisations to be able to carry out modifications to existing facilities. We would also like to advise that specifications be animal specific and take into account the role of the animal, and that there must be wide consultation on drawing up such specifications. Guide Dogs would be very happy to share its expertise on specifications for the accommodation of dogs.

24 August 2004





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 9 December 2004