Select Committee on European Scrutiny First Report


23 Integrated Police Unit in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo

(26148)

Draft Council Joint Action on the European Union Police Mission in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo, regarding the Integrated Police Unit (EUPOL "Kinshasa")

Legal baseArticles 14 and 25 EU; unanimity
DepartmentForeign and Commonwealth Office
Basis of considerationEM of 26 November 2004
Previous Committee ReportNone; but see (25639) —: HC 42-xx (2003-04), para 20 (18 May 2004)
To be discussed in Council7 December 2004 Economic and Financial Council
Committee's assessmentPolitically important
Committee's decisionCleared

Background

23.1 The EU is already running successful police missions in Bosnia-Herzegovina and Macedonia. Last year, following a request from the United Nations and the Transitional National Government in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), the EU agreed to support training an Integrated Police Unit (IPU) in Kinshasa, as part of wider policing and security sector reform in the DRC. It was decided that the initial project would not be launched under the European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP), but that the Commission would lead the training project (as well as refurbish a training centre in Kinshasa). The first group of 300 officers should have completed their training towards the end of November, with a second group beginning their training then, followed by a third group in January.

23.2 In May, we cleared a Joint Action that provided the necessary legal framework for Member States to ensure that the IPU was fully equipped. Initially, Member States' contributions were thought to be sufficient; however, a shortfall emerged, to which the EU offered £200,000 from the Common Foreign and Security Policy budget, conditional on satisfactory oversight of the project, control of funds and monitoring of the whereabouts and use of the equipment. We asked the Minister to keep us informed of developments.[59]

The draft Joint Action

23.3 The possibility of a small EU Police Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), to monitor, mentor and advise the IPU and observe the use of equipment provided by EU Member States, was foreshadowed at the outset. The draft Joint Action represents the formal EU decision, taken by the General Affairs and External Relations Council on 22 November, to begin planning a mission and subsequently launch it, with a duration until 31 December 2005. It draws heavily on the report of a preparatory joint Council Secretariat/Commission Fact Finding Mission (FFM), in Kinshasa from 18 to 28 October 2004, and responds to a UN request to the EU for the earliest possible support for the training project, in order to ensure its effectiveness and sustainability.

23.4 The FFM is thus essentially what would normally be refined into a General Concept, but which in this instance has been incorporated directly into the draft Joint Action. In a full and helpful Explanatory Memorandum of 25 November, the Minister for Europe (Mr Denis MacShane) begins by highlighting its main components:

  • "the mission statement;
  • arrangements surrounding the Head of Mission and other staff;
  • the chain of command and political control and strategic direction (which are typical for a civilian European Security and Defence (ESDP) mission);
  • modalities for the participation of third states;
  • financial arrangements;
  • the need for co-ordination with the Commission's activity in Kinshasa;
  • and modalities for the release of classified information and agreement of the status of personnel (which are also typical of a civilian ESDP mission)."

23.5 He then explains the purpose of the FFM and the detailed elements incorporated into the draft Joint Action:

"Given the urgent need to start planning and the detailed content of the FFM report, it was decided that a separate General Concept should not be developed. A Concept of Operations will therefore be developed by the Secretariat based on the FFM concept in due course. The FFM concept covered the following main issues.

  • The scope of the ESDP mission: This notes that the mission will be developed upon a request of the UN, and within the comprehensive effort of the International Community to reform and train the Congolese National Police (CNP).
  • Mission statement: The ESDP Police Mission in Kinshasa will monitor, mentor, and advise the setting up and the initial running of the IPU in order to ensure that the IPU acts following the training received in the Academy Centre and according to the rules commonly accepted by democratic countries. These actions should be focused in the IPU chain of command to help them in the management of the IPU and in the operational Units in the execution of its tasks.
  • Desired End-State and Exit Strategy: This notes that the desired end state is the IPU chain of command managing the Unit and the operational units performing its tasks according to appropriate standards without any further need for external monitoring and mentoring presence. The exit strategy will be linked to the end of the election process and a period for the consolidation of the Unit afterwards.
  • Objectives: These note that the ESDP Mission should aim at helping to ensure that:
    • —  The IPU's smooth and seamless take over from the Neutral Force regarding the security of the Transitional Government.
    • —  The link between the IPU and the Congolese Ministry of Interior, in particular with the Police Inspectorate General, and helping develop a plan for the future of the IPU.
    • —  The Chain of Command is able to prepare and implement the planning for the different areas of action, including contingency planning.
    • —  Operational procedures for the different tasks of the IPU are in place, including the procedures for the setting up of an appropriate operations room.
    • —  A mechanism for collecting and analysing relevant information is in place.
    • —  A functional administrative, logistics and personnel management system is in place.
    • —  The IPU is suitably equipped and this equipment is maintained and used properly for the accomplishment of the IPU tasks.
    • —  The cohesion and team spirit is maintained within the different levels of the IPU. The integration of the various former factions is achieved and the IPU is free of political interference.
  • Methodology: This notes that to achieve these objectives EU staff should be co-located along the structure of the IPU chain of command to enhance its managerial and operational capacities, and maintain a sustained presence and contact with the appropriate level of the IPU chain of command structure and with the operational Units. It may therefore: follow-up the tasks performed by the operational units, including the monitoring and mentoring on the ground, on a selective basis; monitor and mentor the programme for continued training for the IPU units in reserve; and maintain a liaison with the Congolese Ministry of Interior, in particular with the General Directorate.
  • Structure and Staffing: The FFM report presented two options. Following discussion, it was decided that the mission should be composed of 19 international police officers, four international civilians and six local staff.
  • Duration: The mission will monitor, mentor and advise the IPU during the Transition process until the holding of the elections (scheduled in June 2005), and a period of consolidation after the elections (estimated at three months). Due to the uncertainty over the date of elections with a likely delay of at least three months, the initial duration of the ESDP Police Mission in Kinshasa will be one year (31 December 2005)."

23.6 The estimated cost to the CFSP budget is €4,370,000 (£3,040,000), with a UK contribution of approximately 15% (€655,000/£456,000). Beyond this, the UK is unlikely to provide any personnel, given the need for officers to be fluent in French and experts in para-military policing (the IPU is based on the French gendarmerie/Italian carabinieri policing model).

The Government's view

23.7 In his Explanatory Memorandum the Minister comments as follows:

"The UK believes that to fail to follow-up the training would nullify the considerable investment, in time, money and personnel resources, involved in the training. Furthermore, by monitoring, mentoring and advising the IPU, the EU will contribute to the security of the transitional government in the run up to the elections and provide a model for professional policing in Kinshasa. The UN has also asked for EU support in this area to help guarantee the security of the provisional institutions in Kinshasa. The ESDP Mission, which will deploy in Kinshasa, also underscores the EU strong political commitment, both to the Congolese Authorities and to MONUC (the UN Mission in the DRC).

"The Joint Action notes that the ESDP mission should be launched by early January 2005 in order to avoid a long delay between the training and follow-up mission. The UK supports this."

Conclusion

23.8 Given the relative novelty and the fast-moving nature of European Security and Defence Policy, effective scrutiny is a challenging and evolving process. We are grateful to the Minister for once again informing us in good time of the latest developments in a plainly justifiable EU endeavour. It is evident that the experience of earlier similar missions has been used to good effect in planning this, the first Police Mission in Africa. We have no questions to put to the Minister, and accordingly clear the document.


59   (25639) - ; see HC 42-xx (2003-04), para 20 (18 May 2004). Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 16 December 2004