Select Committee on European Scrutiny First Report


30 Final evaluation of the EU Action Plan on drugs 2000-2004

(26129)

14322/04

COM(04) 707

Commission Communication on the results of the final evaluation of the EU Drugs Strategy and Action Plan on Drugs (2000-2004)

Legal base
Document originated22 October 2004
Deposited in Parliament16 November 2004
DepartmentHome Office
Basis of considerationEM of 25 November 2004
Previous Committee ReportNone; but see (23958) 13853/02: HC 63-vi (2002-03), para 12 (8 January 2003)
Discussed in CouncilPresented to the Council on 25 October 2004
Committee's assessmentPolitically important
Committee's decisionCleared

Background

30.1 The EU Action Plan on Drugs 2000-04 set out measures to counteract both the demand and supply of drugs within the Community. It was based on the Drugs Strategy agreed in December 1999 at the Helsinki European Council. The Action Plan contained about a hundred actions for Member States, the Commission, the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) and Europol to take. In November 2002, the Commission presented a mid-term evaluation of the Action Plan.[66]

30.2 Article 152 of the Treaty establishing the European Community provides for the Community to complement the action of Member States to reduce drug-related damage to human health and to encourage cooperation between Member States for that purpose. Member States are to coordinate their activities and the Commission is to promote such coordination. The Community and Member States are also to foster cooperation with third countries and international organisations in the interests of public health.

30.3 Articles 29 and 31 of the Treaty on European Union provide for police and judicial cooperation to combat crime, including illicit trafficking in drugs.

The document

30.4 The document comprises:

  • a summary of the achievements of the pre-enlargement Member States (the EU 15) and the Commission; matters on which further action is necessary; the conclusions of the final evaluation; and proposals for the future;
  • annex 1 — a summary of the responses to the questionnaire sent to the EU 15 Member States in November 2003 about their implementation of the Action Plan;
  • annex 2 — a summary of the responses of the Commission, the EMCDDA and Europol to a similar questionnaire; and
  • annex 3 — a list of the EU instruments on drugs (including Regulations, Directives, Decisions, Resolutions and agreement with third countries) adopted between January 2000 and the end of July 2004; and a list of proposed instruments still being negotiated.

30.5 The main conclusions of the final evaluation are as follows:

i)  about 95% of the actions included in the EU Action Plan on Drugs have been or are being implemented;

ii)  almost all of the EU 15 Member States have adopted a national drugs strategy or action plan;

iii)  no strong evidence exists that there has been a significant reduction in the availability of drugs or that fewer young people are using drugs; and

iv)  a number of important initiatives have been taken to combat both money laundering and the illicit diversion of precursor chemicals.

30.6 The Commission makes the following main proposals:

i)  the EU Drugs Strategy for the future should contain objectives and priorities that can be turned into operational indicators and actions in Action Plans;

ii)  further improvements are required in the production of comparable and reliable monitoring information about drugs;

iii)  the Commission should shortly propose an Action Plan for Drugs 2005-08, organise an impact assessment of it in 2008 and then propose an Action Plan for 2009-12; and

iv)  the objectives of the new Drugs Strategy and Action Plans should be reflected in the Justice and Home Affairs work programme for the next five years.

The Government's view

30.7 The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State at the Home Office (Caroline Flint) tells us that:

"The Government agrees with the Commission's recommendations. We have thought for some time that the Action Plan was deficient in that it was too much of a list of everything that Member States and the EU corporately should do about drugs and not enough of an action plan proper that set out specific actions by particular entities within specified timeframes. Those weaknesses are being addressed in the new EU Drugs Strategy 2005-2012."[67]

Conclusion

30.8 It is regrettable that there is no strong evidence to suggest that there has been a significant reduction in the availability of drugs or in their use by young people. It is impossible to judge, however, what the situation would have been if it had not been for the Action Plan and the efforts of Member States to curb the supply of and demand for drugs.

30.9 The proposals the Commission has made as a result of the final evaluation appear to us to be pragmatic and sensible. We note that the Government agrees with the proposals and wishes to see them reflected in the new Drugs Strategy.

30.10 There are no questions we need put to the Minister about the final evaluation and we are content to clear the document from scrutiny.


66   See headnote. Back

67   See (26143) 14702/1/04 and (26153) 15074/04: para 31 of this Report. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 16 December 2004