Select Committee on European Scrutiny Third Report


18 European Development Fund in 2004 and forecasts up to 2009

(26173)

15291/04

COM(04) 763

Commission Communication: estimate of commitments and payments and of contributions to be paid by the Member States for 2004 and 2005 and forecast of commitments and payments for 2006 to 2009

Legal baseArticle 8 of the Financial Regulation of 27 March 2003 on the 9th European Development Fund
Document originated19 November 2004
Deposited in Parliament3 December 2004
DepartmentInternational Development
Basis of considerationEM of 30 November 2004
Previous Committee ReportNone
To be discussed in CouncilNo date set
Committee's assessmentPolitically important
Committee's decisionCleared

Background

18.1 The Cotonou Agreement, signed in Benin in June 2003, is the successor to the Lomé Agreement, and the latest such development assistance agreement between the EC and the ACP (African, Caribbean and Pacific) countries. It seeks to create a more favourable context for sustainable development and poverty reduction, and to reverse the processes of social, economic and technological marginalisation in the ACP States. Political dialogue between the Community and each of the partner States (or regions) will play a key role in determining the nature and objectives of the assistance provided. The Agreement is based on respect for human rights, democratic principles and the rule of law, and on good governance. It also establishes special consultation procedures and appropriate sanctions for dealing with human rights violations and serious corruption. It seeks to encourage greater participation by civil society, the private sector and trade unions, with a view to advancing democratic processes and transparency and ensuring that cooperation projects prove more effective than in the past.

18.2 Through a €13.5 billion European Development Fund (EDF) covering the Agreement's first five years, the Community will support the ACP governments in their attempts to create a "balanced macro-economic context", expand the private sector and improve both the quality and coverage of social services. Regional integration among the ACP States themselves is also an important objective, so as to facilitate their integration into the global economy. Gender equality will be systematically encouraged at every level. In many countries, sustainable management of the environment and of natural resources will be promoted. The system of trade preferences which the Community had previously granted to the ACP states will gradually be replaced by a series of new economic partnerships based on the progressive and reciprocal removal of trade barriers, as part of a broader strategy to improve the ACP States' ability to attract private sector investment.

The Commission Communication

18.3 The Communication is a document produced annually under the European Development Fund (EDF) Financial Regulation. It provides financial information to Member States regarding commitments and payments in 2004, justification for the extent of calls for contributions for the next EC financial year (2005), and estimates of the total annual expenditure in each of the following four years from 2006 to 2009.

18.4 The Communication says that the overall commitment forecast for 2004 remains at €3,185m (£2,215.8m) as predicted in May 2004. This total includes funds managed by the European Investment Bank (EIB). The downward revision of the EIB 2004 forecast, from €500m (£347.9m) to €355m (£247m), is compensated for by an upward revision for funds managed by the Commission, from €2,875m (£2,000m) to €3,500m (£2,435m). In the EIB's case, the change is attributed to delays between contract signature and payment; in the Commission's, to the increased rate of payments under the current EDF as it reaches full implementation.

18.5 The total sum required from Member States for 2005 is €2,855m (£1,986.2m) — up from €2,440m (£1,667.5m) in 2003. The UK's EDF contribution is 12.69%, so it will contribute €362m (£251.8m) — an increase from the UK's 2003 contribution (€189m/£131.5m).

18.6 The Commission's EDF expenditure forecasts peak in 2006 at €3,400m (£2,365.4), which is when the greatest number of programmes under this EDF will be active. Thereafter expenditure tails off as programmes near completion in years 2007-2009 (€3,100/£2,156.7m, €2,900m/£2,017.5m and €2,650m/£1,843.6m respectively). The Commission and the EIB believe that they will manage to commit all remaining EDF funds by 2007 (including those transferred from previous EDFs) and that they will be fully spent by 2009, but only if the political and macro-economic conditions in the ACP countries allow for that to happen.

18.7 The Minister notes that the Communication does not take into account any future decision on use of the remaining €750m (£521.8m) of the "conditional" €1bn (£696m). "Use of these funds", he says, "will require a further Council decision following conclusion of the performance review of the 9th EDF. This is expected by March 2005."

The Government's view

18.8 In his 30 November 2004 Explanatory Memorandum, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State at the Department for International Development (Mr Gareth Thomas) says that "the report is helpful in that it shows an upward trend in the level of expenditure in the EDF", which he amplifies thus:

      "Slow disbursement of EC funds either under EDF or the main EC Budget has been a major criticism by the UK in the past. Improved levels of disbursement are a direct result of reform efforts carried out since 2000. Deconcentration of programme implementation to the field has played an important role in achieving this. It has also helped in improving the accuracy of Commission forecasts. We will encourage the EIB to improve the accuracy of its forecasts to a comparable level. In parallel, we will press the Commission to continue to make progress in improving the impact and effectiveness of EC aid, (not dealt with in this Communication), building on the reforms to date."

18.9 He then points out that the Communication "also notes that success in committing and disbursing funds depends on the absorption capacity of the ACP countries" and goes on to say that "the mid-term review of EDF country and regional programmes is currently underway and provides an opportunity to reallocate funds to countries that are performing well. We are participating in this process, both in country and in Brussels, in order to promote efficient and effective use of EDF funds".

Conclusion

18.10 When considering last year's Communication, we noted the Minister's expectation that "deconcentration" (i.e. devolving greater responsibility for programme implementation to in-country EC Delegations) would have a positive effect. It is gratifying that this has been the case.

18.11 But it is still also the case that full and effective implementation of this, the Ninth European Development Fund, will depend not simply on deconcentration but also on absorption capacity in the ACP member states. €1 billion was held back at the beginning of the programme, with its subsequent disbursement, in part or in whole, to be dependent on the outcome of a performance review mid-way through the programme cycle. Earlier this year we cleared the release of €250 million of this for the first stage of the EU Water Facility for ACP countries.[61] We note that the review is due by March 2005, and look forward to hearing from the Minister on the outcome and on any consequential proposals for the release of any or all of the remaining €750 million. In the meantime, we clear this document.


61   (24491) 8864/03 (25313) 5757/04: see HC 42-xii (2003-04), para 14 (10 March 2004). Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 27 January 2005