Select Committee on European Scrutiny Third Report


22 Patient mobility and healthcare development

(25573)

8682/04

COM(04) 301

Commission Communication: Follow-up to the high-level reflection process on patient mobility and healthcare developments in the European Union

Legal base
DepartmentHealth
Basis of considerationMinister's letter of 3 December 2004
Previous Committee ReportHC 42-xx (2003-04), para 5 (18 May 2004)
Discussed in Council2 June 2004
Committee's assessmentPolitically important
Committee's decisionCleared

Background

22.1 In December 2003, a group of EU health ministers and representatives of the European Parliament, patients and others with an interest in healthcare issued a report on patient mobility and heath care. Most of the group's recommendations were addressed to the Commission. In April 2004, the Commission issued this Communication, responding to the report. When we considered the document in June, we put a number of questions to the Government and kept the Communication under scrutiny pending the reply.

The Communication

22.2 The Communication contained the Commission's response to the group's recommendations and had four main sections:

  • European cooperation to enable better use of resources;
  • information requirements of patients, professionals and policy-makers;
  • the European contribution to health objectives; and
  • responding to enlargement through investment in health services and health infrastructure.

22.3 The group had invited the Commission to consider the development of a permanent mechanism at EU level to support European cooperation on matters concerned with healthcare. In response, the Commission said that it had decided to establish a "High Level Group on Health Services and Medical Care".

22.4 The Commission commented:

      "Health services and medical care are primarily the responsibility of the Member States and should remain so. However, it is clear … that there is great potential for cooperation at European level to help patients to have high-quality healthcare and to help health systems to improve their effectiveness and efficiency. Respecting national responsibility for health systems does not mean doing nothing at European level. Rather, [the proposed new High level Group] can ensure that there are structures in place to facilitate cooperation where useful and ensure that where Europe does have an impact on health or health systems, it does so in a positive way and that those responsible for achieving health objectives can shape those developments."[72]

The Government's view on the Communication

22.5 The Minister of State for Health at the Department of Health (Mr John Hutton) told us that most of the action proposed by the Commission is for information sharing or the use of existing mechanisms. The Government was considering how the proposed High Level Group on Health Services and Medical Care might best relate to the other strands of Community activity affecting healthcare.

Our request for further information

22.6 In May, we reported that we recognised the potential benefits of the work the Commission proposed, such as the exchange of experience, cooperation in the evaluation of new drugs and techniques and helping patients, professionals and policy-makers to obtain access to necessary information. We noted, however, that the Communication did not provide any estimate of the cost of the proposed activities; nor did it explain their relative priority. We also noted that the Government was reflecting on the role of the new High Level Group. We asked the Minister to comment on the points we had noted and to tell us the outcome of the discussion of the Communication at the Health Council in June. We kept the document under scrutiny pending his reply.

The Minister's letter of 3 December

22.7 The Minister tells us that, in June, the Council agreed to the setting up of the High Level Group on Health Services and Medical Care, reporting directly to the Council.

22.8 The Minister also tells us that the High Level Group has met four times since July. Its task is to develop proposals for:

  • European cooperation to enable better use of resources;
  • information for patients, professionals and providers;
  • access to and quality of care;
  • reconciling national objectives with European obligations; and
  • health and the Union's cohesion and structural funds.

22.9 The Minister says that the following working groups have been set up to consider, and make proposals to the High Level Group on:

  • cross-border healthcare purchasing and provision, including the impact of patient mobility on patients, healthcare providers and governments and how a common understanding on this can be reached;
  • health professionals, including the potential impact of migration of health care workers within the European Union;
  • centres of reference — the working group is considering what would be entailed in setting up European centres of reference which could provide healthcare to patients with rare diseases calling for a concentration of expertise or special facilities;
  • health technology assessment, including the development of a network of national health technology assessment agencies and health ministries, enabling an effective exchange of information between Member States;
  • information and e-health — the development of an EU information strategy to provide information for citizens, patients, health administrations and authorities; and
  • health impact assessment and health systems — to improve understanding of the impact of EU non-health policies on health.

22.10 The Minister says that:

      "The UK generally welcomes this proposed programme of activity as a basis for developing concrete practical co-operation between member states. When firm recommendations are being made we will clearly need to respond formally as a Member State. Meanwhile, we have made clear however that whilst we support cooperation between the Member States in areas like patient mobility and health technology assessment, we are not in favour of the development of mandatory guidelines in EU level priority setting in these areas. This view is shared by many Member States.

      "We have also stressed the importance of not duplicating the work of other groups, particularly the new High Level Working Group on health to be set up in the Council and the open method of co-ordination on healthcare and long term care."

22.11 The Minister adds that, in the Government's view, the working groups should focus on a smaller number of better-defined issues, that the work should be regarded as a three or four year project and that the emphasis should be on the exchange of information, not new regulation.

Conclusion

22.12 We are grateful to the Minister for his helpful reply. We consider that the Government's approach to the High Level Group's work is appropriate and we agree, in particular, that the priority should be cooperation and information sharing between Member States, not the development of new mandatory guidelines.

22.13 We have no further questions to put to the Minister at this stage and we assume that, when the High Level Group makes its recommendations, they will be put to us for scrutiny. For these reasons, we are content to clear the document.


72   Page 16 of the Communication. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 27 January 2005