Select Committee on European Scrutiny Third Report


28 Annual report on the Structural Funds in 2003

(26119)

14258/04

COM(04) 721

15th annual report on the implementation of the Structural Funds (2003)

Legal base
Document originated28 October 2004
Deposited in Parliament10 November 2004
DepartmentTrade and Industry
Basis of considerationEM of 26 November 2004
Previous Committee ReportNone; but see (25020) 14415/03): HC 42-ii (2003-04), para 10 (9 December 2003)
To be discussed in CouncilNo date set
Committee's assessmentPolitically important
Committee's decisionCleared

Background

28.1 Article 45(2) of the Regulation laying down general provisions for the Structural Funds requires the Commission to make an annual report on the implementation of the Funds.[82]

28.2 The Structural Funds currently comprise:

  • the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), which aims to redress regional disparities within the EU by providing assistance to regions which are lagging behind or are suffering from industrial decline. It provides support, for example, for transport, environmental, telecommunications, energy and tourism projects;
  • the European Social Fund (ESF), which aims to improve employment opportunities for the long-term unemployed, young jobseekers and people excluded from the labour market and to promote equal opportunities and adaptation to changes in industry;
  • the guidance section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund, which provides assistance for, for example, young farmers, hill farms, rural infrastructure and woodland protection; and
  • the Financial Instrument for Fisheries Guidance, which provides assistance to, for example, modernisation of vessels, development of fish farming, development of port facilities and promotion of the processing and marketing of fish products.

28.3 For the period 2000-06, the distribution of the Structural Funds is primarily related to three aims:

  • Objective 1 — to promote the development of regions whose per capita GDP is less than 75% of the Community average and of remote regions (such as the Azores and northern Finland);
  • Objective 2 — to assist regions seriously affected by industrial decline; and
  • Objective 3 —to support the modernisation of policies and systems concerned with employment, education and training outside Objective 1 regions.

28.4 The budget of the Structural Funds for 2000-06 is €257 billion.

The document

28.5 The document fulfils the Commission's obligation to provide a report on the implementation of the Structural Funds in 2003. It has a technical annex containing detailed supporting information.

28.6 Commitment appropriations in 2003 amounted to 96% (over €31billion) of the available funds, the highest level ever for the Structural Funds. Actual payments in 2003 were 89% (€26.2 billion) of the budget, up 18% on 2002.

28.7 The annex provides details of commitments and payments broken down by Fund, sector, objective and recipient Member State. In 2003, Spain received a quarter of all payments from the Funds. Three quarters of the total payments went to five countries (Spain, Germany, Italy, Portugal and Greece). Two sectors were each allocated more than 10% of the available funding: transport infrastructure (15%) and assistance for small and medium-sized enterprises (11%).

28.8 During 2003, measures were introduced to simplify the management of the Structural Funds. These concerned, for example, the arrangements for inspections, for performance measurement and for the amendment of programmes.

28.9 The report provides factual information on the interaction, in 2003, between the Structural Funds and the Lisbon Strategy, other Community policies, the Cohesion Fund, and the European Investment Bank and Fund. It also provides short summaries of five evaluations of programme expenditure between 1994 and 1999. The report comments that the United Kingdom had not provided by 31 December 2003 the information required for another study of "additionality" — that is, that Community funds were used in addition to, not as a replacement for, expenditure by Member States. (The Government says that the Commission has received a document satisfactorily demonstrating additionality by the United Kingdom for the programmes concerned.)

28.10 The Commission reports that the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) carried out 13 inspections in Member States, as well as joint audits with Directorates-General. During 2003, Member States reported 2,439 cases of irregularity or fraud, involving a total of over €340 million. This was about half the number of cases and half the amount of money reported in 2002. (The minimum amount which triggers a report has remained at €4,000 since 1994.)

The Government's view

28.11 The Minister of State for Trade and Industry and Foreign Affairs at the Department of Trade and Industry (Mr Douglas Alexander) tells us that the Commission's report has no financial or legal implications for the United Kingdom and that there is no timetable for its consideration by the Council.

Conclusion

28.12 We draw the document to the attention of the House because of the scale of the expenditure in 2003 from the Structural Funds. It is encouraging that budgetary discipline, as reflected in the figures for appropriation commitments and payments, has improved. There are no questions we need put to the Minister about the report and we are content to clear the document from scrutiny.


82   Regulation (EC) No. 1260/1999, OJ No. 161, 26.6.1999. p.1. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 27 January 2005