Select Committee on European Scrutiny Fourth Report


16 GENERAL BUDGET 2005

(26286)

Adopted General Budget 2005


Legal baseArticle 272 EC; the special role of the European Parliament in relation to the adoption of the Budget is set out in Article 272; QMV
Deposited in Parliament 18 January 2005
DepartmentHM Treasury
Basis of consideration Minister's letter of 11 January 2005
Previous Committee Report None; but see (25920) —: HC 38-iii (2004-05), para 34 (12 January 2005)
Discussed in Council25 November 2004
Committee's assessmentPolitically important
Committee's decisionCleared

Background

16.1 The 2005 general budget of the European Union was adopted following the European Parliament's second reading on 16 December 2004. This marked the close of the 2005 budget exercise. We have reported regularly to the House on our scrutiny of the various stages of development of the budget, most recently on 12 January.[46]

The Minister's letter

16.2 The adopted budget has not been formally published yet, but the Financial Secretary to the Treasury (Mr Stephen Timms) helpfully writes now to give us an account of the final outcome on the budget and the Government's view of it. We annex two tables the Minister has given us usefully setting out the broad budget numbers, in both euros and sterling, and showing the differences between the Council's second reading Draft Budget and the budget adopted by the European Parliament.

THE BUDGET OVERALL

16.3 The Minister tells us the final outcome was in line with the conciliation agreement reached between the Council and European Parliament on 25 November 2004. Total commitment appropriations were set at €116.55 billion (£77.69 billion) — €5.14 billion (£3.43 billion) or 4.6% higher than in 2004. Total payment appropriations were set at €106.30 billion (£70.86 billion) — €5.99 billion (£3.99 billion) or 6.0% higher than in 2004.

INDIVIDUAL EXPENDITURE HEADINGS

16.4 Heading 1 (Agriculture). This category was already agreed at the Council's second reading, as the Council has the final say over this part of the Community budget. Commitment appropriations and payment appropriations were therefore unchanged from the Council's second reading at €49.68 billion (£33.11 billion) and €49.12 billion (£32.74 billion) respectively, leaving a margin of €1,763 million (£1,175 million) below the Financial Perspective (FP) ceiling.[47]

16.5 Heading 2 (Structural Operations). Commitment and payment appropriations were left at €42.42 billion (£28.28 billion) and €32.40 billion (£21.59 billion) respectively. As agreed, the European Parliament used a €45 million (£30 million) mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument[48] to finance in part the PEACE II programme for Northern Ireland in 2005. This left a margin of €63 million (£42 million) below the FP ceiling.

16.6 Heading 3 (Internal Policies). The European Parliament maintained its first reading position, increasing commitment appropriations to €9.05 billion (£6.03 billion) and payment appropriations to €7.92 billion (£5.28 billion). As agreed €40 million (£26.663 million) was mobilised from the Flexibility Instrument to cover the extra commitments above the FP ceiling.

16.7 Heading 4 (External Actions). Commitment appropriations were increased to €5.22 billion (£3.48 billion) and payment appropriations were increased €5.48 billion (£3.65 billion). This was €100 million (£66.66 million) above the FP ceiling and was financed, as agreed, by the Flexibility Instrument in order to ensure €190 million (£126.65 million) for reconstruction in Iraq.

16.8 Heading 5 (Administration). The European Parliament maintained its first reading position (taking into account the effect of Amending Letter to the PDB No. 2/2005)[49] with the net effect of increasing non-differentiated appropriations for the Heading to €6.35 billion (£4.23 billion).

16.9 Heading 7 (Pre-Accession). The European Parliament accepted the Council's second reading total for commitment appropriations of €2.08 billion (£1.39 billion) but increased payment appropriations to €3.29 billion (£2.19 billion).

The Government's view

16.10 The Minister tells us:

    "Overall, the Government believes the adopted Budget meets its key objectives. In particular, budget discipline has been maintained by ensuring the budget is consistent with the Berlin ceilings, and by ensuring a sensible level of payments at just 1% [of] EU GNI.[50] Limited deployment of the Flexibility Instrument (€185 million) compared to the EP's first reading proposals (€244 million) was necessary to secure funding of the PEACE II extension and reconstruction in Iraq (both key UK priorities). But in return we were able to secure a two-year deal for PEACE II and adequate funding for the Union's Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP). The Government played a key role in securing a positive outcome working closely with the Dutch Presidency and the new Budget Commissioner Dalia Grybauskaité."

Conclusion

16.11 We are grateful to the Minister for this early account, in advance of formal publication, of the 2005 General Budget as adopted. We clear the document.




46   See headnote. Back

47   There is a global FP ceiling for payments, but this is not sub-divided for individual categories. So individual category margins are available only for commitments. Back

48   The flexibility instrument is a budgetary instrument established in the Inter-Institutional Agreement which provides for additional financing, for a given year and up to the amount of €200 million, of clearly identified expenditure which could not be financed within the limits of the ceilings available for one or more spending categories. Back

49   See headnote. Back

50   Gross National Income. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 3 February 2005