Select Committee on Foreign Affairs Written Evidence


Annex 1

  Lt Gen Saleh writes: The New Vision, 2 November 2004

YESTERDAY Lt Gen Salim Saleh reacted to a New Vision story quoting The Vanguard that he had written to the President over the third term. Following is the statement given by his aide to journalists yesterday:

  1.  Mr Museveni, exiting politics means surrendering the field to all the old entrenched lobbies ie religious and tribe clubs and the new power grabbed in the names of SEYAS, FDCs, UYD, UPKSs, RPES etc.

  2.  What we need is a new radical but liberal groupings that can concertise the relationship that has been struck by NRM and the entrepreneurs primarily and empowerment within the means possible of the masses through cooperative economics. This will create a dynamic, open and tolerant society that has African values.

  3.  African values are not compatible with western liberal democracy and the so-called human rights and good governance. Africans put more premiums on order, harmony, collective welfare and authority. This is why we need capable ministers, prescient legislations, a just and effective legal system and little or no rhetoric on democracy, human rights and good governance.

  4.  While human rights may well be "Universal" in nature, it is crucial to bear in mind the national and regional peculiarities.

  By fostering individualism, democracy will breed chaos and conflict erodes faith in the authorities.

  5.  The unfinished struggle is the main reason why I think Museveni is maybe interested in the third term business. He will, I believe at an appropriate time, tell Ugandans the length of the struggle, how much mileage have we covered and how long is remaining. Then people will decide whether what he is telling them is true or not. Hence the referendum on term limits.

  6.  A country needs more than freedom and democracy. It needs other values, polices strategies and different tactics for different situations. Hence even the constitution is not static or dogmatic.

  A country needs community. It has to have norms, trust, coordinated action and not partialised acts. We need to relate to each other beyond the confines of our personal concerns and interests.

  7.  Without stronger communities, I don't see how democracy and decentralisation can take place, trust and ties at every level in society can enhance business and productivity.

  8.  I should not forget to comment on the current catch word, "GOOD GOVERNANCE", for whom is this good governance and for what? The phrase is vague and vaguely understood.

  Under our current situation, it often means good for capitalist development. Mind you this good governance is lacking in countries that are:

    (a)  Close to the equator.

    (b)  Ethno linguistically heterogeneous.

    (c)  Use socialist or French laws.

    (d)  Large numbers of Catholics or Muslims.

  We should ask ourselves why these virtues lack in areas that are characterised by the above mentioned trends.

  9.  In my opinion, we should sign a social contract where citizens are expected to refrain from interfering in political governance so long as the government can deliver fast economic growth and rising prosperity. We should, however, bear in mind that rebuilding a social system is not easy.

  10.  We must also take into consideration the factor of globalisation. It is destructive, exploitative and disruptive but unavoidable.

  Somebody said that globalisation is like writing. When writing first came/spread through the world, it was disruptive as old skills of story telling became less valuable.

  A new elite emerged and monopolised power and till today, everything evolves around writing although half of the world population does not know how to read and write.

  Therefore globalisation like writing is an unavoidable necessity. It can appear to be evil, cause suffering etc. So one day globalisation will be treated like writing.

  A powerful tool that can enhance quality of life, which is harsh but unavoidable and unavailable.

CONCLUSION

  Replacing the type of leadership may be harder than overthrowing it. Anybody who overturns or diverts the direction may destroy the entire foundation on which prosperity was beginning to germinate from.

  It is easier to displace than replace. I think we should keep our eyes not ears on the ground at grassroot level "Essanja" is slowly taking shape.

  Alternatively we can experiment with the phenomenon known as the "glazier effect".

  C K Akandwanaho 88 Oriba—LL General (res) SCSC—Kimaka.

  Published on: Thursday 2 December 2004.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 26 March 2005