Select Committee on Foreign Affairs Written Evidence


Appendix 4:  Letter to the Chairman from the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs

LIAISON WITH THE QUADRIPARTITE COMMITTEE

  Thank you for your letter of 25 October.

  Your first point is well taken. As you know, agreeing a response to any enquiry directed to four departments is considerably more time-consuming than, for example, replying to the Foreign Affairs Committee alone. There was also a particularly large amount of licensing information to consider, but I accept that it is unfortunate that we were unable to supply the declassified data in time to meet the print deadlines for your report of 18 May. We have now published this data on the FCO's website, in order to be as open as possible.

  On your second point, we did strive to meet the deadline officials agreed with your clerk to reply to your extensive and detailed report, and regret that this was not possible. With the resources available in this area, and the need for Ministers in four departments to comment on and clear the reply, our response was sent to the Committee two days before your meeting. I am sorry if this did not allow sufficient time for it to be considered fully. Nevertheless, I hope you will agree that the answers (particularly the lengthy response to your conclusion 48) genuinely respond to all of the points raised, and show the seriousness with which Government takes the Committee's views on strategic export controls.

Jack Straw

November 2004





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 24 March 2005