Select Committee on Foreign Affairs Written Evidence


Letter to the Chairman of the Committee from the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, 9 December 2004

  During your recent visit to Vienna, you mentioned that the Committee would like to receive greater detail of our agreement with Iran over its development of uranium enrichment and reprocessing technology. This forms part of the agreement negotiated in Paris on 5-6 November 2004, which took effect on 15 November 2004. A copy of the agreement is enclosed.

  Under the agreement Iran has undertaken to suspend "all enrichment related and reprocessing activities, and specifically:

    —  the manufacture and import of gas centrifuges and their components;

    —  separation, or to construct or operate any plutonium separation installation; and

    —  all tests or production at any uranium conversion installation".

  This goes beyond the Joint Statement made in Tehran on 21 October 2003 (copy enclosed), in which Iran undertook to suspend "all uranium enrichment and reprocessing activities as defined by the IAEA", in that it explicitly includes enrichment-related activities, and identifies a number by name, including in the area of uranium conversion. Crucially, in the new agreement Iran has also undertaken to sustain the suspension while negotiations proceed on mutually acceptable long-term arrangements.

  The IAEA has now verified that the agreed suspension is in place. This opens the way for negotiations on a long-term agreement to begin.

  The Paris agreement makes clear that the long-term arrangements will provide "objective guarantees" that Iran's nuclear programme is exclusively for peaceful purposes. There will also be firm guarantees on nuclear, technological and economic co-operation and firm commitments on security issues.

  The UK, France and Germany ("the E3") have not agreed that Iran should eventually resume enrichment-related or reprocessing activities. The E3 have made clear to Iran that at present we can envisage no "objective guarantees" which could give us the necessary confidence that do not include cessation of all activities which could help Iran produce weapons-grade fissile material. This would include enrichment-related, reprocessing and uranium conversion work. We recognise that it would in principle be possible to develop mechanisms for monitoring enrichment or reprocessing work that would give a high degree of confidence that declared nuclear materials were not being diverted. This would be effective as long as those monitoring mechanisms remained in place. However, such monitoring mechanisms would not provide objective guarantees that Iran could not use enrichment-related or reprocessing technology to produce fissile material for nuclear weapons in the future. Once the technology has been mastered, even for civilian purposes, it would be possible in future to use it, or adapt it, to produce fissile material. Given the history of Iran's failure to meet its safcguard8 obligations, we believe that monitoring alone would be inadequate to give us the assurance we need.

  We are now working with E3 and EU partners to develop proposals in other areas which would accompany the guarantees. We have indicated to Iran our willingness to offer political assurances of access to the international nuclear fuel market at market prices, in line with measures at present being developed in various international fora, with spent fuel to be returned and reprocessed outside of Iran. We have also indicated our willingness to support Iran's acquisition of an alternative to its planned heavy water research reactor which does not present the same proliferation-related concerns. We will first need to establish with Iran its needs for research reactors, and how they could most appropriately be met. Other areas where we might potentially work with Iran include nuclear safety and the physical security of nuclear installations and material. In non-nuclear areas, the working groups set up by the Paris agreement are due to consider technology and co-operation, and political and security issues. We look forward to an early discussion with Iran about the agenda for these working groups.

Rt Hon Jack Straw MP

Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs

9 December 2004

Annex 1

  The Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Governments of France, Germany and the United Kingdom, with the support of the High Representative of the European Union (B/EU), reaffirm the commitments in the Tehran Agreed Statement of 21 October 2003 and have decided to move forward, building on that agreement.

  The E3/EU and Iran reaffirm their commitment to the NPT.

  The E3/EU recognise Iran's rights under the NPT exercised in conformity with its obligations under the Treaty, without discrimination.

  Iran reaffirms that in accordance with Article II of the NPT, it does not and will not seek to acquire nuclear weapons. It commits itself to full cooperation and transparency with the IAEA. Iran will continue to implement the Additional Protocol voluntarily pending ratification.

  To build further confidence, Iran has decided, on a voluntary basis, to continue and extend its suspension to include all enrichment related and reprocessing activities, and specifically:

    —  the manufacture and import of gas centrifuges and their components; the assembly, installation, testing or operation of gas centrifuges;

    —  work to undertake any plutonium separation, or to construct or operate any plutonium separation installation; and

    —  all tests or production at any uranium conversion installation.

  The IAEA will be notified of this suspension and invited to verify and monitor it. The suspension will be implemented in time for the IAEA to confirm before the November Board that it has been put into effect. The suspension will be sustained while negotiations proceed on a mutually acceptable agreement on long-term arrangements.

  The E3/EU recognize that this suspension is a voluntary confidence building measure and not a legal obligation.

  Sustaining the suspension, while negotiations on a long-term agreement are under way, will be essential for the continuation of the overall process. In the context of this suspension, the E3/EU and Iran have agreed to begin negotiations, with a view to reaching a mutually acceptable agreement on long term arrangements. The agreement will provide objective guarantees that Iran's nuclear programme is exclusively for peaceful purposes. It will equally provide firm guarantees on nuclear, technological and economic cooperation and firm commitments on security issues.

  A steering committee will meet to launch these negotiations in the first half of December 2004 and will set up working groups on political and security issues, technology and cooperation, and nuclear issues. The steering committee shall meet again within three months to receive progress reports from the working groups and to move ahead with projects and/or measures that can be implemented in advance of an overall agreement.

  In the context of the present agreement and noting the progress that has been made in resolving outstanding issues, the E3/EU will henceforth support the Director General reporting to the IAEA Board as he considers appropriate in the framework of the implementation of Iran's Safeguards Agreement and Additional Protocol.

  The E3/EU will support the IAEA Director General inviting Iran to join the Expert Group on Multilateral Approaches to the Nuclear Fuel Cycle.

  Once suspension has been verified, the negotiations with the EU on a Trade and Cooperation Agreement will resume. The E3/EU will actively support the opening of Iranian accession negotiations at the WTO.

  Irrespective of progress on the nuclear issue, the E3/EU and Iran confirm their determination to combat terrorism, including the activities of Al Qa'ida and other terrorist groups such as the MeK. They also confirm their continued support for the political process in Iraq aimed at establishing a constitutionally elected Government.

14 November 2004

Annex 2

Joint statement at the end of a visit to the Islamic Republic of Iran by the Foreign Ministers of Britain, France and Germany

  1.  Upon the invitation of the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran, the Foreign Ministers of Britain, France and Germany paid a visit to Tehran on 21 October 2003. The Iranian authorities and the Ministers, following extensive consultations, agreed on measures aimed at the settlement of all outstanding JABA issues with regard to the Iranian nuclear programme and at enhancing confidence for peaceful cooperation in the nuclear field.

  2.  The Iranian authorities reaffirmed that nuclear weapons have no place in Iran's defence doctrine and that its nuclear programme and activities have been exclusively in the peaceful domain. They reiterated Iran's commitment to the nuclear non-proliferation regime, and informed the Ministers that:

    (a)  The Iranian Government has decided to engage in full co-operation with the IAEA to address and resolve, through full transparency, all requirements and outstanding issues of the Agency, and clarify and correct any possible failures and deficiencies within the IAEA.

    (b)  To promote confidence with a view to removing existing barriers for cooperation in the nuclear field:

    (i)   Having received the necessary clarifications, the Iranian Government has decided to sign the JABA Additional Protocol, and commence ratification procedures. As a confirmation of its good intentions, the Iranian Government will continue to cooperate with the Agency in accordance with the Protocol in advance of its ratification.

    (ii)  While Iran has a right within the nuclear non-proliferation regime to develop nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, it has decided voluntarily to suspend all uranium enrichment and reprocessing activities as defined by the IAEA.

  3.  The Foreign Ministers of Britain, France and Germany welcomed the decisions of the Iranian Government and informed the Iranian authorities that:

    (a)  Their Governments recognize the right of Iran to enjoy peaceful use of nuclear energy in accordance with the NPT.

    (b)  In their view, the Additional Protocol is in no way intended to undermine the sovereignty, national dignity or national security of its States Parties.

    (c)  In their view, the full implementation of Iran's decisions, confirmed by the IABA Director-General, should enable the immediate situation to be resolved by the JALA Board.

    (d)  The three Governments believe that this will open the way to a dialogue on a basis for longer-term co-operation, which will provide all parties with satisfactory assurances relating to Iran's nuclear power generation programme. Once international concerns, including those of the three Governments, are fully resolved, Iran could expect easier access to modern technology and supplies in a range of areas.

    (e)  They will cooperate with Iran to promote security and stability in the region, including the establishment of a zone free from weapons of mass destruction in the Middle East in accordance with the objectives of the United Nations.

21 October 2003





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 5 April 2005