Select Committee on Home Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 173-179)

14 DECEMBER 2004

MR CHRISTOPHER JONES, CANON GUY WILKINSON, DR DON HORROCKS, REV KATEI KIRBY, MR RICHARD ZIPFEL AND FATHER PHILIP SUMNER

  Q173 Chairman: Good afternoon. Thank you very much indeed for coming this afternoon and responding to our request to give evidence to the Committee. As you will know, I think, this is the third hearing that the Select Committee has held on the subject of terrorism and community relations. As you will have seen, we do have a very packed agenda this afternoon which will almost certainly be disrupted by one or more votes on the Mental Incapacity Bill, so we will need to keep quite strictly to time. Although the issues are complex and important I would be grateful, firstly, if you could keep your answers as short as you can and, secondly, not to reinforce a point unnecessarily which has been made already by another witness. Perhaps we can start by each of the witnesses introducing themselves and then I will begin the questioning.

Rev Kirby: Good afternoon. I am Reverend Katei Kirby and I am the General Manager for the African and Caribbean Evangelical Alliance.

  Dr Horrocks: My name is Don Horrocks. I am head of Public Affairs at the Evangelical Alliance.

  Mr Zipfel: I am Richard Zipfel and I am a policy adviser for the Catholic Bishops Conference.

  Father Sumner: Father Philip Sumner, a Catholic priest from Oldham. I am on the Oldham Community Cohesion Partnership and the Oldham Voluntary Community and Faith Sector Partnership.

  Mr Jones: I am Christopher Jones, policy adviser for Home Affairs in the Mission and Public Affairs division of the Church of England.

  Q174 Chairman: We understand that The Revd Wilkinson from the Church of England will be with us very shortly. If I could start with a general question perhaps to each of the Christian faith groups which are represented here. Are you able, from the experience of your own part of the church, to give specific examples in your own experience or that of your members of the way in which the threat of terror has affected the lives of minority groups or of social cohesion? Can we start with the Evangelical Alliance, either of the witnesses.

  Dr Horrocks: Not specific examples, no, but I can make some more general comments on that.

  Q175 Chairman: We will come back to more general comments in just a moment but for the Catholic church, Father Sumner?

  Father Sumner: Certainly from my experience in Oldham, every time there has been some terror attack a number of people refer to me, whether in confidential situations or outside confidential situations, who almost presume that whatever happens on their television screens is happening on a much wider basis than it actually is. So the presumption that terrorists are everywhere, that it is very prevalent, and the level of tension within a community does rise. There are other things which have happened as well in our community in places like Oldham but that has been one element. When something is put on the television screen I hear far more comments from my own parishioners, for example, concerning the Muslim community, the presumption being that terrorism is everywhere and that the Muslim communities are responsible.

  Q176 Chairman: Just to press you on that point, which is interesting, if it is television coverage then that is not necessarily slanted or biased coverage. It is simply people translate a factual report from somewhere else in the world to the streets around?

  Father Sumner: Except that very often those reports are slanted and the word terrorism is associated with Islam and they are put too closely together so often, unfortunately.

  Q177 Chairman: We will come back and explore the media issues a little later on. Mr Jones?

  Mr Jones: We have some examples of the threat of terrorism raising suspicion in the community when people are not acquainted with the ways of different religious groups. For instance we know about a devout Sufi in Bury who suffered a bereavement and as is the custom quite a lot of people came to visit the house at this time of bereavement. A neighbour seeing these bearded men arriving telephoned the police and the police arrested this man at night and it caused quite a lot of reverberation in the community. In a way this was because there was insufficient understanding of Sufi bereavement practices.

  Q178 Chairman: Again to each of the groups of witnesses, are you able to give a broad assessment of the extent to which you think social cohesion has got worse in the years since 9/11 in a way which might be related to the impact of terrorism?

  Rev Kirby: I think I would want to bounce back a question about the whole understanding of cohesion actually. Certainly for Christians we did not wait necessarily until 9/11 to pull together. Our message is not about waiting for a crisis but responding to need anyway. In terms of whether it is better or worse, I think that is quite subjective, it depends on who you talk to and which area of the country you are in. For some people it seems still quite recent and raw, if I can put it that way, but for others it is about getting on with life and doing the best they can in the aftermath of it.

  Mr Zipfel: Our impression is that especially among individual members of Asian communities they feel more vulnerable and alienated. If you move up to people who are more active in the community who meet one another across communities, there does not seem to have been as much of a sense of things getting worse. So vulnerability at the very grass roots level but an attempt to keep things steady at more of an inter-community level.

  Mr Jones: I think I would agree with what Mr Zipfel has just said and perhaps observe that there may be a difference in the affect on people who never have contact with other minority groups and who are reacting at second hand to what they perceive and to what is going on in local communities which are more mixed. I think there the picture is very patchy, some good things are happening as well as these problems of suspicion and vulnerability and tension.

  Q179 Chairman: The final question in this opening session—I will not come to you, Mr Jones, you have given an example already but to the other groups of witnesses—in relation to counter-terrorist activities, the measures that the Government, and perhaps particularly the police, have taken to try to protect the country from terrorism, do you have clear experience and examples of whether that has caused problems in community relations? It is widely reported that it has but I wonder if in the experience of your organisation you have been able to assess the extent to which that is true?

  Father Sumner: I have an interfaith worker for whom I am his line manager and he reports on quite a few occasions, within his own Muslim community in Oldham, how there are people, although they are working, doing an ordinary job, they really have a fear that the knock on the door could come and they could be arrested on suspicion of something and their name be ruined overnight without any real grounds for that to happen. That is a real fear that has happened because of the number of people who have been arrested.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 6 April 2005