Select Committee on Home Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 260-263)

14 DECEMBER 2004

MR DANNY STONE, MS LUCIANA BERGER, MR RAJA MIAH MBE, MS CAROLYN GOMM, MS JOSIE TYAS AND MS KARINE BAILEY

  Q260 David Winnick: This is continuing, is it?

  Ms Berger: Yes, it is. It is very new. It is the first time ever that NUS is holding any type of conference do with this area of activity.

  Mr Stone: We pride ourselves on really taking the interfaith dialogue seriously. We have long established links with the British Organisation of Sikh Students and the National Hindu Students Forum. We were involved in the debate on the right to wear a hijab in France with the United Sikhs. We have got a Muslim and Jewish women's dialogue group at Cambridge called MOJOW and a new one has been set up called MOJOM (the Muslim and Jewish Men's Dialogue), we have had "urbans versus turbans" football tournaments and there are all kinds of really positive things going on.

  Q261 David Winnick: Can I turn to PeaceMaker. I am sure that we would agree that the work that is being done is first-class. We are extremely impressed. Based on your discussion with other young people, what do you feel would be the best way to contribute to community cohesion and breaking down barriers, which, as you know, in some respects from your own experience exists on a level which is extremely unfortunate, breaking down barriers between different groups?

  Ms Tyas: I think that small things like sports clubs and different organisations could be set up to help break down the racial barriers and racial tension. I think tiny little things can build up to stop the racial tension throughout Britain.

  Q262 David Winnick: May I ask, and I hope you do not mind me asking both of you: how did you get involved in such excellent work?

  Ms Bailey: It was through school. PeaceMaker got involved with our school a couple of years ago, and then in about year eight we got asked if we wanted to get involved in it, and we accepted and we have just moved up through there.

  Ms Tyas: We started off doing a bit of anti-racism stuff and then we did stuff about communication and things, and now we are doing story-telling and about different religious festivals, and we have done this as well.

  David Winnick: I suspect it is quite likely you will end up on this side of the table asking the questions in future years. Thank you very much.

  Q263 Chairman: As a final question from me, when you have had all your discussion groups, did you end up feeling worried or frightened about the future with your generation growing up with these different views or tensions, or was there enough in there that that was good and positive for you to feel confident about the future?

  Ms Tyas: Definitely not. I am not confident about the future. With racism as it is, I think there needs to be a lot more done to improve the racist situation as it is, but I would feel more confident about the future if there were more organisations. There are a few people in each school that are not racist but it counteracts the large percentage that are racist. If we could just break down that racism in schools then I would be a lot more confident.

  Ms Bailey: It is the same with me really. I was quite scared, because everyone says there is terrorism and, when you think about it, a terrorist attack could happen any time and it is quite frightening. I have not got the confidence to say I do not think anything is going to happen, because it can happen at any time. I think it is quite worrying to think that.

Chairman: Thank you all very much indeed. It is quite challenging, I think, to come and give evidence to a Select Committee. It has been an extremely good afternoon. Thank you very much for the evidence you have all given.





 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 6 April 2005