Select Committee on Home Affairs Written Evidence

15.Memorandum submitted by the Hindu Forum of Britain


  1.1.  The Hindu Forum of Britain (HFB) is the largest representative body for British Hindus with over 230 Hindu organisations formally affiliated to it.

  1.2.  HFB works closely with government departments, service providers and other stakeholders to consult the Hindu community on service delivery and policy issues affecting British Hindus. HFB also works closely with other faith communities to engage in constructive dialogue and nation building.


  2.1.  There are over 700,000 Hindus living in Britain. The Hindu population has integrated into British society with high levels of employment and education, a very low rate of crime and substantial economic and cultural contributions to this country.

  2.2.  The Hindu population is concentrated in London, Leicester, Birmingham, Manchester, Leeds, Bradford and elsewhere. It is perhaps the most dispersed population among the ethnic minorities.

  2.3.  The Hindu religion is inclusive and actively promotes the values of non-violence, peaceful co-existence and respect for other religions.


  3.1.  Extremist ideologies arising from religious or political beliefs have become a cause of concern for the HFB and its member organisations. Such ideologies have been the breeding ground for incitement to hatred and terrorism. The threat of religious terrorism is the greatest danger for the security of Britain.

  3.2.  The threat arising from international terrorism remains real and serious. International terrorists have in several statements specifically named the United Kingdom and British interests as targets, and encouraged attacks to be carried out against the country. International terrorists and supporters of affiliated groups or those that share such ideologies are known to be active in the UK.

  3.3.  International terrorist groups are known to raise funds in the UK and often under the cover of charities.

  3.4.  The public perception of faith communities has been affected by some of the more visible and vocal groups of religious extremists. They have created negative stereotypes of entire communities. Religious terrorism is different from the religion it purports to represent, and many of these groups are not always supported by a majority of the people from those faith communities.

  3.5.  Violent events outside Britain, in particular in the Indian sub-continent, have often resulted in increasing polarisation between Hindu and Muslim communities in Britain.

  3.6.  The Home Secretary has given assurances in Parliament that the Government is aware of concerns in all communities about the threat from terrorism to the UK and its interests. The Home Secretary has had regular meetings with the leaders of some faith and ethnic minority communities to discuss their concerns and ensure that they receive the support and protection that they need.

  3.7.  Unfortunately the level of consultation and support has been inconsistent, and specifically, the Hindu communities have not been consulted nor provided an opportunity to discuss our concerns as much as other communities. This is mirrored at London level.

  3.8.  We welcome the Government's further plans to tackle the threat of terrorism by strengthening the law against racially and religiously motivated crime, the recent announcement to outlaw religious discrimination in the provision of goods and services and the proposal to create an offence of incitement to religious hatred.


  4.1.  The general British public has grown increasingly concerned about terrorism since September 11.

  4.2.  The Hindu community of Britain has suffered various attacks on their places of worship, particularly during festivals as well as on individuals and property. Many believe that the extreme viewpoints expressed by fundamentalist groups, including unacceptable conversion tactics and verbal and written abuse, have led to increased levels of violence against the Hindu community—particularly in West Yorkshire, West Midlands, East Midlands and parts of London.

  4.3.  Major terrorist attacks on temples and places of worship in India usually lead to higher levels of security concerns in the UK. For instance, the explosions that killed Hindu monks and worshippers at the Swaminaryan temple at Akshardham in Gandhinagar by terrorist Islamic groups in September 2002 and the terrorist attack on Raghunath temple in Jammu and Kashmir in March 2002 resulted in increased fear within the Hindu community and security measures in British temples being tightened and overhauled.

  4.4.  There is a growing concern in the Hindu community that security issues involving the Hindu community are not treated as seriously as other communities. The community infrastructure to deal with security issues is only recently being identified and built with the help of outside agencies like the Community Security Trust (CST).


  5.1.  The Hindu community is a part of the Indic traditions comprising the four faiths of Hinduism, Sikhism, Jainism and Buddhism. The four faiths have a special relationship in that the religions have common traditions and cultural values originating from the Indian sub-continent. The Hindu Forum of Britain maintains good relationships with the main umbrella bodies of the Sikh, Jain and Buddhist traditions, and with other organisations from each of these faiths.

  5.2.  The Hindu Forum of Britain also has a warm working relationship with the Jewish community through the Board of Deputies (BOD) and the CST. The community has been advised by the BOD and CST on building community and security infrastructure as well as collecting and analysing security information. The two communities have also had cordial relationships through the meetings and cultural events of the Indian Jewish Association UK. The student bodies of the two communities, the National Hindu Students Forum and the Union of Jewish Students have maintained close relationships on university campuses, where students from both communities have faced similar threats from religious fundamentalists. The two groups will hold their first joint event later this year.

  5.3.  The Hindu-Christian dialogue initiated by various Hindu and Christian organisations has helped maintain close relationships with representatives of the Church of England, the Catholic Church and the Free Churches.

  5.4.  The Muslim Council of Britain and the Hindu Forum have recently held high-level meetings to explore means by which the two communities could work together in Britain. Of particular importance has been the consensus that both organisations should focus on areas of co-operation rather than areas of debate.

  5.5.  The Hindu community also play an active role in inter-faith dialogue through the Interfaith Network and various local inter-faith initiatives.

  5.6.  Recently, the Hindu Forum of Britain has initiated a faith community consultation programme for identity cards, where representatives of the Hindu Forum of Britain, the Board of Deputies, the Muslim Council of Britain, the Network of Sikh Organisations, the Jain Samaj Europe and the Bahai community agreed to work together to understand issues surrounding the enrolment and verification processes surrounding identity cards. This is an example of how faith communities came together to deliver a project-specific deliverable. It illustrates how well the Hindu community has integrated into British life and is able to proactively lead on a matter of national importance.


  6.1.  The Hindu Forum of Britain have welcomed anti-terror measures by the Government through the Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001.

  6.2.  While endorsing the need to balance national security and safety of British citizens, the HFB however, urge diligent use of the powers conferred on the police in the hope that the human rights of detainees, including the right to a fair trial, are upheld.


  7.1.  While British parliamentarians, service providers, the CRE and others have become increasingly and rightly become aware of the dangers of Anti-Semitism and Islamophobia, there is rarely any mention of Antihind-ism, its historical context, and how it applies to Britain.

  7.2.  Over the last 1,000 years in the Indian subcontinent, Antihind-ism has historically taken the form of violent attacks, including killings of Hindus; forced conversions; misinformation campaigns aimed at denigrating Hindu beliefs; the marginalisation of Hindu communities through denial opportunities in education and employment; seizure and destruction of property and temples; and the intellectual subjugation of its belief system by means of Antihindic propaganda aimed at undermining the theological and spiritual basis of Hinduism. Antihind-ism continues to this day and is active in Britain.

  7.3.  Contemporary Antihindic incidents follow a systematic historic pattern but take several forms, both here in Britain and internationally. Examples of recent Antihindic behaviour in Britain are included in Appendix 1 of this document, while examples of Antihindic behaviour outside Britain are listed in Appendix 2.

  7.4.  Over the past 10 years, the Hindu community in Britain has been subject to a visible and increasing growth of Antihind-ism. This has taken the form of:

    (i)  Attacks on temples and properties.

    (ii)  Attacks on individuals.

    (iii)  Attacks on students at universities.

    (iv)  Inciteful leaflets and publications.

    (v)  Verbal abuse.

    (vi)  Misinformation campaigns.

  Examples of such incidents are attached in Appendix 1.

  7.5.  On many occasions, Antihind-ism has taken the form of misrepresentation and misinformation in institutions like the British Parliament. On 16 November 2004, Mr Jagdeesh Singh, from the Sikh Community Action Network (an organisation that many Sikh leaders claimed did not represent their community's views) submitted oral evidence to the Home Affairs Select Committee on Terrorism and Community Relations and made unsubstantiated and untrue claims that the Swaminarayan temple in Neasden was a base for terrorist activities. This claim has angered both Hindu and Sikh communities since the Swaminarayan Temple teaches the Hindu values of peace; has never supported extremism or fundamentalism in any form; does not have any other organisation operating from its temple premises; has inspired millions to a peaceful way of life; and has itself been a victim of Kashmiri extremists who attacked and killed monks and worshippers at the Gandhinagar Akshardham temple. Reactions from community leaders are attached in Appendix 3 of this document.

  7.6.  Mr Jagdeesh Singh has also made allegations against the VHP, but has not produced any evidence to support his claims. Most Hindus in this country regard the VHP as a peaceful organisation that has contributed to social and moral development within the community. The VHP has issued a public statement in 2002 condemning all forms of terrorism.

  7.7.  The Hindu Forum of Britain requests that selection procedures for candidates giving oral evidence be scrutinised thoroughly. If a faith community is allowed only one chance to submit its oral evidence, care should be taken to choose organisations that represent the community through broad-ranging membership and consultation.

  7.8.  The internet has provided a new tool for Antihindic propaganda, and there are innumerable sites that either ridicule or vilify Hindu beliefs and customs. While many of these sites may not be classified as incitement to religious hatred, they do nevertheless, affect community relations at the grassroots.

  7.9.  HFB has sought the help of the CST to help monitor Antihindic incidents including physical attacks on Hindus and property, verbal or written abuse, threats against Hindus, and distribution of Antihindic leaflets, posters, and material through print, broadcasting and electronic means. The Hindu Forum hopes to monitor Antihindic incidents in Britain to the same forensic standard as the CST.


  8.1.  The national British media has been largely indifferent to Antihindic incidents and does not give them the same prominence as other forms of racism and xenophobia. Antihindic incidents, particularly those of desecration of Hindu temples, have been rarely reported in the national media, although the ethnic and regional media covered these incidents to some extent. Desecration of places of worship or cemeteries of other faith communities have been reported sympathetically in the media, and correctly so.

  8.2.  While loss of lives through terrorism in Palestine and Israel always gets media attention in the West, loss of human life through terror attacks on the Hindu community in India do not get the same attention. A list of terrorist killings in India that had little or no mention in the western media is attached in Appendix 4.

  8.3.  Use of Hindu images, Hindu icons in a degrading manner often considered insulting to the Hindu tradition and distortion of Hindu beliefs in the media has been widespread and has often angered and offended Hindus.


  9.1.  Hindu communities have reported a lack of adequate response from certain police forces in reporting, recording and investigating racially or religiously aggravated crime against Hindus. In West Yorkshire, for instance, documented incidents have shown that due to the lack of adequate response and follow-up from the Police, the community are feeling increasingly insecure and are losing confidence in the police.

  9.2.  The Hindu Forum have established a working relationship with the Diversity Unit at ACPO and other police units, including the Metropolitan Police, to offer advice, training and input on Hindu issues, publishing literature on religious and race crime, acting as third party reporting centres and visits to Hindu temples for familiarisation lectures.

  9.3.  The number of Hindu victims of race or religious crime who report crimes against them is very low. The Hindu Forum is seeking a partnership with the Police to promote awareness amongst the Hindu community to report crimes of this nature and help to increase the feeling of security within the community. It is anticipated that this partnership will lead to faster response times and increased confidence.

13 December 2004




  1.  Separatist terrorists have forcibly driven nearly 350,000 Hindus out of the Kashmir valley by harassing them, illegally occupying their houses and issuing death threats. These displaced Hindus have been turned into refugees in their own country, living in squalid conditions with little aid from outside. Very little is written or reported in the western media about these victims of separatist terrorism in India.

  2.  The continued attacks on Hindus including destruction and confiscation of property, rape and killings in Bangladesh by religious and political extremists has resulted in a systematic decline of the Hindu population. Amnesty International has requested the Bangladeshi government to "take urgent action to protect the country's Hindu minority following weeks of grave human rights abuses." Reports of human rights abuse of Hindu minorities in Bangladesh can be found at:

  3.  The oppressive treatment and systematic discrimination of Hindus in Pakistan has resulted in the denial of basic human rights, employment and education on grounds of religion. This has happened to such an extent that what constituted well over 10% of the population at partition has now been reduced to an insignificant minority of less than 1%.

  4.  The oppressive treatment of Hindus under the Taliban regime in Afghanistan is well known and documented. The decade-long civil war and particularly the six years of Taliban rule saw the numbers of Hindus and Sikhs plummet from a few hundred thousand to only 30,000. As relatively well-off minorities, they were the first to be targeted with looting when Mujahedin in-fighting broke out in 1992 after the fall of the Communist-backed regime. All eight Sikh and Hindu temples in the capital Kabul were ransacked and destroyed. The Taliban, who won international notoriety, forced them to wear yellow badges to distinguish them from the Muslim majority.



EDM 212 29.11.04

Terrorism and Community Relations

  That this House notes with deep regret the testimony given to the Home Affairs Select Committee investigation into terrorism and community relations by Mr Jagdeesh Singh in which he suggested that the Swaminarayan Temple in Neasden allowed itself to be used as a base for violent and terrorist activities; considers this allegation to be totally without foundation and abhorrent to a community which has itself suffered a terrorist attack on its mother temple in Gandhinagar, India where many monks and two British citizens were shot and killed; and further considers that this allegation has caused profound offence to the wider Hindu community in the UK and is damaging to good community relations and urges the Select committee to invite representatives of the Swaminarayan community to give testimony before the Committee that will establish a more accurate picture of the work for positive community relations that the Swaminarayan Temple is engaged in.

Extract of letter from Superintendent Steve Brown, Operational Commander North, Brent Borough sent to Rt Hon John Denham MP, Chairman of the Home Affairs Committee on Friday 3 December 2004:

  I fully appreciate that Mr Singh's comments are part of a transcript of evidence given to the committee on 16 November 2004. However, I feel that such comments could provoke religious or political tensions within the wider population and could discredit the excellent work, which the leaders of this mission are currently doing within the community . . . I would urge you and your committee to disassociate yourselves from this statement at your earliest opportunity as it may be perceived by website visitors that there is either credence to this allegation or Home Office backing for Mr Singh's assertions.

Extract of letter from Cllr Ann John, Leader of Brent Council sent to Rt Hon John Denham MP, Chairman of the Home Affairs Committee on Friday 3 December 2004:

  I know the temple is an exclusively religious organisation that is not affiliated in any way shape or form to any political organisation . . . Its very existence is a beautiful, living monument to the Hindu principles of peace and harmony. I know that the trustees and devotees, in common with most religious people, are committed to peace, tolerance and love of humankind. It is inconceivable that they would advocate terrorism or allow their premises to be used by those who do. The accusations made in Mr Singh's "evidence" is deeply wounding to all associated with the temple . . .



Courtesy: Press Trust of India

  Following is the chronology of major killings of Hindus in Jammu and Kashmir since the return of popular governments in the border state after nearly seven years of central rule promulgated in the wake of eruption of militancy in 1990:

    Jan 25/26,1997: 25 Kashmiri Hindus killed at Wandhama-Ganderbal Srinagar.

    Mar 20: Seven Kashmiri Hindus killed in Sangrampura (Budgam).

    April 18 1998: 27 Hindus killed in Prankote in Udhampur district in Jammu region.

    June 19: 25 Hindus killed in Chapnari area of Doda district in Jammu region.

    July 28: 16 Hindus killed in two villages of Doda District in Jammu region.

    August 8: 35 Hindus killed in Kalaban on Jammu-Himachal Pradesh border.

    Feb 20, 1999: Four Hindus killed at Muraputta-Rajouri, nine at Barlyara-Udhampur and seven at Bllala-Rajouri in Jammu.

    June 30: 15 Hindu labourers killed in Anantnag district of south Kashmir.

    July 19: 15 Hindus killed at Layata in Doda district of Jammu.

    February 28, 2000: Five Hindu drivers killed near Qazigund in Anantnag district of Kashmir.

    Mar 20, 2000: 35 Sikhs massacred at Chatisinghpora in Anantnag.

    August 1: 31 Hindus including pilgrims to the holy shrine of Amarnath killed at Pahalgam in Anantnag.

    August 1-2: 27 Hindus gunned down in Qazigund and Achabal in Anantnag.

    August 2: Seven Hindus killed in frontier District of Kupwara in North Kashmir.

    August 2: 11 Hindus killed in Doda district of Jammu.

    February 3, 2001: Six Sikhs gunned down in Mahjoornagar in Srinagar.

    Feb 11: 15 Hindus massacred in Kot-Chadwal in Rajouri district of Jammu.

    Mar 2: 15 Hindu policemen and two medical assistants killed in Manjkote area of Rajouri.

    March 17: Eight Hindus massacred near Atholi in Doda.

    July 21: 13 Hindus, including seven Amarnath pilgrims killed at Sheshnag in Anantnag.

    July 22: 12 Hindus massacred in Cheerji and Tagood in Doda district of Jammu.

    August 4: 15 Hindus killed in Ludder-Sharotid Har area of Doda.

    August 6, 2002: Nine Amarnath pilgrims killed and 29 others injured at Nunwan base camp in Pahalgam area of Anantnag district in south Kashmir.

    March 24 2003: 24 Kashmiri Hindus massacred by terrorists in Nandimarg in Shopian area of Pulwama district in south Kashmir.

previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 7 January 2005