Select Committee on Home Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 120 - 135)

TUESDAY 11 NOVEMBER 2003

MR BRYAN BAKER, MS JILL BERLIAND AND MR NEIL ORR

  Q120  Janet Anderson: It would be better to have hostel-type accommodation and mother and baby units?

  Mr Baker: Yes, I think it would be.

  Ms Berliand: When we are talking about hostels it is much harder for a women to get a hostel place. Therefore, when she is coming up to the possibility of being sentenced to custody or not the alternatives are not as open as they are for a man. Frequently a woman will go into custody because there is no alternative address for her. I think that makes a big difference. We did a survey not very long ago of bail officers for women in women's estate prisons, and the facilities for bail officers were deplorable. In my local prison if a man wants to apply for bail he has only got to ask to see the bail officer who will come up and see him, tell him what to do and how to apply for bail, done and dusted. Many women's prisons have a bail officer maybe for one afternoon a week. Women need to apply for bail and they need help. Bryan pictured it so well—it is difficult for a woman to think past that block of "I've got to get out and sort out my family". They cannot think past their behaviour or anything. They cannot move forward until that is sorted. We need bail hostels and we need bail officers in jails, we really do.

  Q121  Chairman: Can I ask you about juvenile offenders. There is one group of prisoners in the prison population where we produce particularly bad results in terms of re-offending, the 18-21 year-old males. What is your assessment of the current state of the rehabilitation and education services for them; whether they should be improved; and why is it going so badly wrong for that group?

  Mr Orr: I would entirely agree that it is very, very poor for the young. Young remand prisoners do not have to do anything. Remand prisoners do not have to go to work or do education, and they are perfectly happy to sit in their cells with their television. Once they are convicted then they should be encouraged, but it is difficult to encourage them when there are not many things for them, except for these primary skill courses with computers. The ones that really work are when you can put a young man in front of a computer and teach him how to read and write; teach him how to write his CV; teach him how to write a letter of application for a job and eventually build up a portfolio. That is where they really shine and come into their own. One or two I have seen have gone out and one into full-time education in the university, having come in illiterate. It can be done but it is very limited and needs more funds.

  Mr Baker: From my experience of seeing Young Offenders' Institutes lately, and Jill is probably the best one to speak about Young Offenders' Institutes partly because her daughter was on the board of one of them, a great deal of work is done by officers now and a lot of progress is being made, and education is good, but you still face the problem of peer pressure. You cannot actually be seen to be doing it because that is not quite the macho image.

  Q122  Chairman: Listening to Ann Widdecombe's questions earlier about real work in prisons would you regard this as having any particular significance for this group of young people whom, I guess, will have the highest proportion of people who have never been in work in their lives?

  Mr Baker: I would surmise, and it would only be my view, that when you get them at the next stage, 21 onwards, and they come into the male prison that is the time when you will start to have a greater effect on them then you will at 18 where they are still very conscious of what the boy in the next cell thinks, and what the gang thinks. "You're actually working; you're actually going to education. You've got to be mad".

  Mr Orr: I do not entirely agree with my colleague on that one. I went round the MCTC in Colchester yesterday, the Military Corrective Training Centre, and there are these young men, 18 and 19, doing just the sort of things that Ann Widdecombe was talking about—fitting exhausts into cars, fitting windscreens into cars and learning how to build walls, sign writing and decorating, things they can go out and do at once and they see their peers doing it too and it works very well. You cannot do a lot of these things unless you can write and apply for a job or read a notice. They can work the two in together, but they are actually doing something and that is what they really like.

  Ms Berliand: There is a dichotomy between Young Offender Institutes—which I think are doing for the most part some very good work indeed, driven by good officers and good governors—and the male local which is holding 18-21 year olds. There is this dichotomy that while you are on remand you are a young adult and, indeed, you go to the adult court. The day you are convicted you come back to that same jail, to that same cell but you are a young offender. That makes it enormously difficult for governors to manage. When you are a young offender you have to be educated separately and live separately.

  Q123  Chairman: Let us move on. From your evidence you clearly regard short-term prisoners in general as a bit of a disaster for the Prison Service whether they are on remand or short sentences. I do not want to distort what you say but that is how I read your evidence! What should we be doing, firstly, about remand prisoners that would be different? Presumably there are reasons they are on remand rather than out on bail. Secondly, what should we be doing about the short-term sentence regime to make it better?

  Ms Berliand: Can I answer about the remand prisoner. It may be a need to look at whether it is right ever to remand into custody a prisoner for an offence that is very unlikely to receive a custodial sentence when he or she is sentenced—if, for example, you have shoplifted £2.50 in Marks and Spencer that should ever carry a remand in custody; because it is highly unlikely that the actual offence would carry custody. If some looking at was done to that, that might help remands. Long-term remand prisoners who change their briefs regularly because they know that time spent on remand counts as double time and are actually spinning time out.

  Mr Baker: It comes back to what we said at the beginning, we are there to monitor what happens in prisons, in the same way as the Prison Service is there to hold the prisoners of the courts sent to them. Short-term prisoners are achieving nothing in prison but disrupting the service.

  Q124  Chairman: They are achieving nothing anyway. You have in said in some places the management can do something quite useful. Are there any places that you hear discussed at your annual conferences where people think they have to choose an alternative regime for short-term prisoners?

  Mr Baker: No, you are talking largely about people doing three months, or six months, and there is not sufficient time for the Prison Service to do anything with them. One of the things that needs to be done (and this is a personal opinion, and not the opinion of the organisation but it has been widely discussed at our conferences) is to make community service acceptable to the general public. I think one of its problems at the moment is that the general public does not consider it acceptable. If it can be given some credence then that would be the way to move forward with short-term sentences.

  Q125  Chairman: There was an idea from the Public Accounts Committee last year that one thing we might do, even somebody on a six-month sentence, is to start a course that they could continue presumably at an FE college or similar. Are you aware of any moves in that direction? Has anybody explored that in practice?

  Mr Baker: I have not heard anybody say that.

  Mr Orr: I can see some of these young people on our careers workshop are going into full time education afterwards. That, I reiterate, is ring fenced and the chaps who are running it have outside contacts and are making all the bridges there need to be. If I could do that for everybody, it would be wonderful.

  Ms Berliand: They are not being moved because frequently people are being released in the north of England perhaps when their homes are in Devon.

  Q126  David Winnick: You said the general perception is that community service is seen as a soft option. Is that your view and that of your colleagues?

  Mr Baker: That is the view of my colleagues and it is my view as well. The people I talk to and suggest to that these people should not go into prison but they should do this, in the general conception of the public, that is just a holiday.

  Q127  David Winnick: That is your view to some extent as well?

  Mr Baker: When you see footballers who are sentenced to giving 20 hours of teaching people to kick a football and that has been their life and their love, I cannot see personally that that is a penalty.

  Chairman: James Beatty is continuing to coach in Beavis Town Primary School months and months after his community service finished, so possibly there are some examples which give the lie to that.

  Q128  Bob Russell: I would like to put on record my appreciation of the whole voluntary concept and so many volunteers in the whole prison set-up, both at prison and post-prison, and in particular the visitors' centre at Chelmsford, which I am hoping that the Committee may in due course visit to see the excellent work that is being done there in appalling conditions. The prison service has recently established a voluntary and community sector strategy group. Have you seen evidence of an emerging partnership between the prison service and the voluntary sector as regards provision of educational and rehabilitative initiatives?

  Mr Baker: Yes. This is in part individual to the prisons and how far it has developed. There are two areas of voluntary work which are making an outstanding contribution to prison life. One is in the provision of people to go in to help with the learning of reading and writing, which is spreading very rapidly and having remarkably good effects. The other two organisations which make an outstanding contribution that we see day by day in the work that we do would be the Samaritans, who perhaps make the greatest contribution in the way that they train listeners and provide help for those who have the greatest problems in prison. Their work is absolutely invaluable. Prison visitors spend an enormous amount of time over a very long period with people who have problems and no one else that they can turn to. They also help and they are very important parts of the rehabilitation process.

  Q129  Bob Russell: It is obviously early days but do you see that the prison governors as a group welcome the emergence of this new strategy or do they think it is just a nuisance?

  Mr Baker: My experience of prison governors as a whole is that they welcome anybody who will help the better running of the prison, to improve the life and prospects of prisoners.

  Mr Orr: As long as they do not have to provide the funds. We had a very good YMCA presence in prison for two years and it was withdrawn last year because the prison provided £3,000 and the YMCA provided £3,000 and the fund has dried up. That excellent service has been taken out.

  Q130  Bob Russell: The prison funds dried up or the YMCA's portion?

  Mr Orr: It was probably: "You do your bit and I will do mine." They decided that would fold. The Samaritans are very effective with their listeners. You probably do not know at the moment but at the visitors' centre that you mentioned, the East Region Families Trust, which is a charity, has come in with a very, very large donation of £45,000 a year for seven years, to support and increase the liaison between families and prisoners. That is a very considerable step forward.

  Q131  Bob Russell: That is charitable funding?

  Mr Orr: Yes.

  Ms Berliand: It is also true that where you have volunteers coming into the higher security prisons, if there is nobody to escort them, they can spend long periods of the day, which is inevitably quite a short day because of prisoners being behind their doors through lunch and stuff, and if there are no operational support grades to escort them, then they get no further than the gate and that is another management problem.

  Q132  Bob Russell: That is the voluntary sector when the prisoners are in prison. Has the voluntary sector a role to play in providing assistance and guidance to prisoners post-release? If so, how do you see the voluntary sector getting involved there?

  Mr Baker: It is one of the things that we would probably like to see made stronger than it is at the moment. Any area that gives support to a prisoner when he comes out of prison is valuable. That is when they are at their most vulnerable. There are a lot of organisations that associate themselves with prisons that could help—church groups are a good example—just to contact somebody they can talk to, somebody they can seek help and guidance from, somebody who will just go and talk to them so that they have company. Sometimes they are moved away from areas and all sorts of things when they come out. There is a great deal that could be done in that respect and again it should be part of a coordinated programme.

  Q133  Bob Russell: We have been told that more than 40% of prisoners lose contact with families and friends in the course of a prison sentence. Can you tell us about the structures or initiatives that are in place across the prison system to assist prisoners pre-release with planning for resettlement in terms of helping to find accommodation, employment, access to education, rehabilitation programmes, so that the build up to their release and their post-release is a continuation, and the involvement, if any, of the voluntary sector in helping them?

  Mr Baker: The largest area involved with the release of the prisoner is the Probation Service which is often under great pressure.

  Q134  Bob Russell: That is part of the system, is it not?

  Mr Baker: Yes, but that has to be the coordinating factor when you are looking at releasing a prisoner, because they have to ascertain and satisfy the prison service that there is a proper release plan, that he has somewhere to live that is acceptable. It is at that stage that the group that we were talking about earlier, a professional group, could involve the voluntary sector to say, "This man is coming out into your community. Can you help giving him contacts or a job?"

  Q135  Bob Russell: It strikes me that the voluntary sector is more structured within the prisons when the prisoners are there than it is when they come out. The prison system seems to welcome the voluntary involvement, but does the Probation Service also welcome the voluntary support that may be available? Do they encourage it?

  Ms Berliand: I think they work well with housing associations and those sorts of challenges. They are looking at any voluntary group in the community but it is the Probation Service that brings together what is available in the area of that prison. I am sorry to go on about it but so many prisoners do not want to stay there because their homes are somewhere else. That is a very real problem.

  Mr Baker: The point you make is a very strong point, that there is a very coordinated help system within the prison. When you ask the question and make us stop and address it, we think: hang on a minute. They are not there when you release them from prison, so there may well be grounds for building up a support group network that adopts a prisoner when he comes out of prison, to help him through that first initial period.

  Chairman: A subject that we will pursue, I am sure, with other witnesses and the voluntary sector and so on in later hearings. Could I thank you very much? It has been very useful.





 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 7 January 2005