Select Committee on Home Affairs Written Evidence


37.  Second supplementary memorandum submitted by the Police Superintendents' Association of England and Wales

INTRODUCTION

  Please find below comments from the Police Superintendents' Association of England and Wales. These should be read in conjunction with other papers submitted to the Home Affairs Select Committee during their investigations into police reform.

  "Building Communities, Beating Crime" is an extensive and complex document and these comments represent a first pass by the Association at the various proposals contained therein.

  The Association has no issue with many of the proposals and we welcome the overall thrust of the white paper in placing communities at the heart of the crime and disorder agenda. Their empowerment and the emphasis on the delivery of citizen focussed policing is a philosophy this Association has supported and promoted for many years.

  However, issues not addressed in the white paper, most notably the structure of the service in England & Wales, are a disappointment to the Association. We feel that the Government has missed an opportunity to radically reform the police preferring to "tinker around the edges" rather than fulfil its promise to fundamentally alter public service.

  An opportunity has been lost to create a meaningful mechanism to involve local communities and place that on a statutory footing. An infusion of democratic representation at the Crime and Reduction Partnership level would, in our opinion, lead to greater involvement by local communities in the way they are policed.

SELECTED PROPOSALS

  This paper will concentrate of a number of proposals in the white paper, where the Association and its membership have already made comment.

Police Community Support Officers

  PCSO's have become a useful additional resource for police commanders to deploy. They are working effectively in teams with others from the extended police family in many locations across England & Wales.

  Even though the evaluation is not complete early signs are that they are well received by communities, who value having a recognisable uniform presence in their midst.

  We understand Government's desire to achieve consistency in equipment, training and powers for PCSO's and wholeheartedly support the proposal, however we caution against any further extension of PCSO powers.

  This so-called phenomenon of "powers creep" will make PCSO's "too useful" and police commanders will be sorely tempted to use them in roles which take them away from the communities they serve, thereby defeating the whole objective of having them in the first place. If they disappear from the streets the public will feel cheated.

Single non-emergency number

  We supported this concept when it was put forward in 2001. We are disappointed at the seeming lack of progress and would urge the Committee to use its influence to increase the momentum towards its introduction.

  The inexorable growth in telephony traffic being experienced by every police force and the lack of capacity to deal with such high volumes of calls is creating a situation where the public are becoming increasing critical of the inability of the police to answer their telephone queries quickly and efficiently.

  We see the single non-emergency number as a vital way in dealing with this demand and allowing more urgent, police related calls being dealt with as a priority.

Specialist qualification for BCU Commanders

  We welcome this proposal and look forward to working with Government to bring it in. We see this as an indication that Government want to treat policing as a profession. There are other measures contained in the white paper such as career pathways and proposals to establish accreditation for vital roles, such as Senior Investigating Officer, which this Association has long supported.

  We also welcome the proposal to establish a policing qualification, and would like to see this open to all staff.

Multiple points of entry

  The Association supports this proposal provided applicants joining the service at any point demonstrate the skills and competences applicable to that rank and/or role.

  We feel this is an opportunity for the Service to plug gaps in skills make-up, particularly in technical and managerial posts. However, we are also confident that the Service can and does produce people of exceptionally high quality that applicants from outside the Service will have to be of very high calibre to be successful.

  We feel that to attract outside candidates, particularly for senior management positions (superintendent and chief superintendent posts), there will need to be a re-examination of the current remuneration and rewards packages.

Work-based assessment as alternative to OSPRE

  We feel that the Government may have jumped the gun here. The announcement in the white paper seems to have anticipated the outcome of the recently commenced trial.

Performance Development Reviews

  PDR's should be at the heart of developing all staff in the Service. There introduction has been at best patchy and there is a great need for national monitoring and standards. There is no consistency in the way PDR's are used across England & Wales.

  Our initial findings from our membership in respect of PDR's and personal work-related objectives are that some ACPO line managers are finding the task difficult which in turn leads us to feel there may be a training need.

National Standards

  Whilst we applaud the Government's move towards instituting national standards and informing citizens what they can expect from their police service, we wonder seriously how this can be achieved with the current structure of policing in England & Wales.

  Consistency in many issues between the 43 police forces has not been evident up to present; therefore we have little confidence that consistent national standards will be achieved.

Empowering BCU Commanders

  The Association has long championed this issue as a vital measure to make delivery effective at the local level. However we are disappointed that the Government are announcing more work in this area when there have already been major pieces of research carried out by the Police Standards Unit and ourselves. We feel this is procrastination.

Police Improvement Agency

  We are still unclear where this new body will sit in the policing landscape. Whereas we understand and applaud the philosophy behind the concept, we would welcome more detail as what the PIA will do, where it will sit, and who will staff it.

CONCLUSION

  Many proposals in the white paper are sensible and overdue. They will undoubtedly create many working parties and absorb energy. It is a shame that that energy will not be utilised in something more radical and fitting for the 21st century.

26 November 2004






 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 10 March 2005