Select Committee on Home Affairs Written Evidence


39.  Third supplementary memorandum submitted by the Metropolitan Police Service

  The Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) is pleased to be offered this further opportunity to comment on the development of Police Reform, following the publication of the White Paper, "Building Communities, Beating Crime. A Better Police Service for the 21st Century." The has made extensive reference in its written submissions and oral evidence to the Committee on the majority of the issues in the White Paper, and the observations below are largely limited to those that have not already been covered. The MPS is still in the process of wide consultation both internally and externally on the White Paper, and has yet to finalise a view on many of the issues contained within it.

  For ease of reference, observations have been ordered in the sequence in which they appear in the White Paper.

CHAPTER 3—COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT

  The chapter titled, "A new relationship between the police and the public" contains many of the key messages that the MPS was keen to give at the oral evidence session on 14 of September. The MPS considers that active collaboration with citizens is the only way to create both shared ownership of local problems and also build long term sustainable success. The development of Safer Neighbourhoods teams will be key to ensuring that Londoners have a real say in how they are policed.

  The MPS agrees that customer satisfaction with the police should be an integral part of the policing. Personal experience of policing shapes the public view of the police. A stronger emphasis on customer service will lead to increased satisfaction levels and greater support for the service. There are also operational benefits to be reaped in terms of increased intelligence and better understanding of local issues as a consequence of greater and more effective engagement with the communities of London.

  The MPS believes that performance targets should reflect not only national concerns but also ones that are within the remit of local police commanders to address in consultation with local communities. On that basis, the inclusion within PPAF of inspection and measurement around local priorities and public satisfaction is welcome.

  The MPS is fully committed to effective engagement with communities. It already has a developed understanding of the interests, main concerns and wishes of the majority of the community and is engaged at every level in meaningful and productive discussions in order to improve the service it provides. The White Paper offers an opportunity to examine, in consultation with other agencies and government, how that process can be refined and improved.

CHAPTER 4—BUILDING A NEW WORKFORCE

  The MPS agrees that effective leadership will be crucial to the success of the majority of the reforms outlined in the White paper. The pressure for modernisation brought about by the increasing complexity of tasks and roles is evident throughout police service leadership. Leaders are selected not only for their command abilities, but also for their management skills. The MPS needs leaders at every level who can understand and operate within complex frameworks of political and community accountability, who can handle media pressure, and who have both financial planning skills and the ability to negotiate and influence public opinion. The mechanisms outlined in the White Paper will assist in the identification and development of suitably talented individuals who will drive these reforms forward.

  The MPS believes that there is scope for converging the terms and conditions of employment of police staff and police officers in the Service. Modernisation of the employment framework should tackle the issue of equalising workforce conditions between warranted officers and other staff. The service is currently required to operate separate human resource systems for police officers and police staff, which do not assist a culture of integration and shared effort.

  The MPS supports the principle of direct entry to the service at various levels and the removal of requirements that minimum amounts of time have to be served in any given rank. The recruitment of flexible, able leaders who have been attracted to the service through different points of entry, appropriate to the nature of the challenges they will face, provided they have the requisite skills, is supported. However, the MPS firmly believes that this proposal must be accompanied by reform of the police pension system, allowing pension portability to encourage able officers to leave, gain experience in other sectors and return.

CHAPTER 5—ENSURING EFFECTIVENESS

  The MPS thinks that the National Policing Plan should be an enabling framework that provides for as much room as possible for creative local solutions rather than a prescriptive list of activities which does not necessarily place due emphasis on the issues that are of importance to local communities. Over-emphasis of the national dimension at the cost of the confidence of local communities in the willingness or ability of local police commanders to commit resources to what matters to them is likely to be counterproductive in terms of community engagement.

  The key to the introduction of earned autonomy in policing is in the target-setting regime under which the police service operates. The concept is unlikely to be successful without a reduction in the number of centrally-applied targets. Only then can effective floor standards be set for national performance, which in turn leave room for the local target setting which characterises real community engagement.

  The MPS sees a lighter touch inspection regime as complementary to the introduction of earned autonomy. This concept is entirely consistent with the introduction of local accountability mechanisms, reducing the requirement for more general inspections. Autonomy will not be something worth achieving if it is accompanied by an accountability regime which is bureaucratic and backward-looking.

  The MPS views on powers of inspection and intervention, the proposed National Policing Improvement Agency, the Police Standards Unit and the HMIC have been fully set out in previous submissions to the Committee.

  The proposed review of the partnership provisions of the Crime and Disorder Act is an activity to which the MPS will wish to make a full contribution in due time. Joint inspection processes and accountability mechanisms that cut across organisational boundaries and promote true partnership working are crucial to success in the future.

  The MPS is seeking clarification from the Home Office over the provisions relating to membership of police authorities and the powers of the police authority with a view to establishing which of the proposals are intended to apply to the MPA.

CONCLUSION

  Once again, the MPS is grateful for the opportunity to contribute to the Home Affairs Committee's consideration of the modernisation process. In due course it will make a full response to the Home Office, including detailed observations on the contents of the White Paper.

29 November 2004






 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 10 March 2005