Select Committee on Home Affairs Written Evidence


24. Memorandum submitted by the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

  1.  We want to offer everyone the opportunity of a decent, affordable home in a sustainable community. We believe that people everywhere have a right to expect a quality local environment with well-managed green spaces, and to be safe and to feel safe in their local neighbourhood. And we know that improving housing and revitalising communities will not be successful in improving quality of life if people feel threatened in those homes or fearful of using public spaces because of the anti-social behaviour (ASB) of a small minority.

  2.  We are working closely with other Government Departments and local service providers and have made good progress so far, with a focus on the most deprived neighbourhoods. We have reduced the number of non-decent homes by 1 million and rough-sleeping is down by two-thirds. We have delivered 3,000 new neighbourhood wardens, and have seen crime fall by 28% in the first wave of warden areas. We have invested over £200 million in well-managed parks and public spaces and are working with Defra on the Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Bill.

  3.  We are determined to tackle anti-social behaviour wherever it occurs. We are promoting balanced local approaches that involve prevention, support and enforcement to crack often complex problems. And we are also introducing new tools, for instance, implementing new legislation to expand the range of tools available to local authorities to tackle anti-social behaviour across all housing tenures.

  4.  Furthermore, through our ongoing work on the development of local:vision—the long term strategy for the future of local government—we will be working closely with the Home Office to consider how local government can work most effectively with other partners to tackle anti-social behaviour.

  5.  This memorandum sets out further details of our approach.

NEIGHBOURHOOD ENGAGEMENT AND RESPONSIVE SERVICES

  6.  Alongside the ODPM's 5-year plan, "People, Places Prosperity", we published a discussion document on neighbourhood engagement, "Citizen Engagement and Public Services: Why Neighbourhoods Matter", as part of the Government's debate on a 10-year vision for local government. We have worked closely with the Home Office on this document and it is a jointly badged publication (ODPM and Home Office).

  7.  We want opportunities for people to help shape the public services they receive in their neighbourhood, with new opportunities for people to become involved in the democratic life of their locality. We believe that by action at the neighbourhood level people everywhere can make a real difference to the quality of our country's public services. We recognise that there can be no "one size fits all" approach. That is why we are proposing a framework for neighbourhood arrangements that builds on what people are already doing. This will involve a neighbourhoods charter, a menu of options for action at the neighbourhood level, and key principles for neighbourhood engagement.

  8.  It will be for councils everywhere to provide opportunities and support for neighbourhood activities that are right for their localities. The discussion document sets out ideas for building on the proposals outlined in the Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Bill and the Police Reform White Paper in relation to tackling anti-social behaviour. It states that it may be appropriate in certain circumstances for neighbourhood bodies to be empowered and authorised to levy fixed penalty notices and apply for Anti-social Behaviour Orders (ASBOs) if there is a persistent problem in the neighbourhood in relation to, for example, litter, graffiti or other anti-social behaviour. It also discusses the possibility of Quality Parishes having additional responsibilities in relation to, for example, hedge disputes, recommending alcohol licence reviews or applying for ASBOs.

LOCAL AREA AGREEMENTS

  9.  Local Area Agreements (LAAs) form a key part of the Government's 10-year vision for local government. They will enable local areas to focus on the delivery of a limited number of key outcomes, with rationalised funding streams, simplified audit and monitoring processes and greater flexibility to find local solutions to local problems. LAAs are currently being piloted in 21 areas and we have just announced a further 40 pilots to be in place by 2006.

  10.  LAAs will be structured around three blocks: children and young people, safer and stronger communities, and healthier communities and older people. There is a mandatory outcome for all LAAs on anti-social behaviour within the safer and stronger communities block. In addition, local areas may choose other supporting outcomes and indicators in any of the three blocks, and/or propose their own.

  11.  LAAs will help improve joined-up working among local partners, including the voluntary and community sector. They present a significant opportunity for empowering communities to take ownership of improved outcomes for their local area, including local concerns on ASB where they exist. Whilst LAA negotiations are ongoing, local areas are tailoring their own approaches to ASB. For example, Bradford includes in its LAA the aim of "supporting young men to create positive futures," whilst Ipswich is focusing on reducing alcohol misuse, which in its area is associated with 70% of ASB.

LOCAL AUTHORITY FUNDING

  12.  In 2005-06, central government has continued to provide a real terms increase in investment in local government which will allow authorities to continue to deliver improving services at an affordable cost. For 2005-06, the Government will provide local authorities with £49 billion in Formula Grant, which represents an increase of 5.6% compared with 2004-05. In addition, for 2005-06 central government will be providing councils with £11.1 billion in specific grants, and this represents an increase of 9.4% compared with 2004-05. The proportion of the total Formula Grant for 2005-06 that is provided as police grant is £11.8 billion, an increase of 6.7% compared with 2004-05.

CLEANER, SAFER, GREENER PLACES

  13.  ODPM leads on the delivery of the cross-Government "Cleaner, Safer, Greener Communities" programme. We will measure our performance through our new PSA target which sets out to make measurable improvements in local quality of life in every community, by 2008. In particular, this PSA will also work in close conjunction with Home Office's PSA2 in delivering the priorities of the Cleaner, Safer, Greener Communities programme which are to:

    —  Create attractive and welcoming parks, play areas and public spaces.

    —  Improve the physical fabric and infrastructure of places.

    —  Make places cleaner and maintain them better.

    —  Make places safer and tackle anti-social behaviour.

    —  Engage and empower local people and communities.

    —  Provide appropriate provision for children and young people, and tackle inequalities.

  14.  At the heart of the programme is support for local authorities to raise standards. Local authorities will receive around £7 billion for local environmental services over the next three years to tackle such issues as litter, graffiti, fly-posting, dog-fouling and abandoned vehicles. This will be supplemented by the Safer and Stronger Communities Fund which merges several existing ODPM and Home Office funding streams for wardens, neighbourhood management, community empowerment, liveability, building safer communities and tackling anti-social behaviour. The Safer and Stronger Communities Fund will be rolled out across all local authorities in England from April 2005 with funding being a minimum of £210 million, £220 million and £230 million for 2005-06, 2006-07 and 2007-08 respectively.

  15.  We will also provide extra powers to deal with anti-social behaviour through the Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Bill, published by Defra. Fly posting, litter droppers, abandoned vehicles and other nuisances which blight our communities will be targets for action. Specific proposals in the bill include:

    —  ensuring that local Crime and Disorder Reduction Partnerships will take anti-social behaviour affecting the local environment into account in developing crime and disorder reduction strategies;

    —  new powers to gate nuisance alleyways that attract anti-social behaviour;

    —  and making greater use of fixed penalty notices as an alternative to prosecution.

  16.  Over the next three years, the ODPM will work with the Home Office, DCMS, Defra, DoH, DfT, as well as practitioners at all levels, to sustain a climate of innovation and good practice to promote Cleaner, Safer, Greener places. We will commit £5 million over the next three years to establish a "How To" programme, including the production of three Guides which will outline the powers and tools available to tackle the issues which affect our town centres; homes and streets; and parks and open spaces. The "How To" Guide for Town Centres will be published in March and will focus on making town centres, cleaner, safer and better run, with a particular focus on the impact of the night time economy and anti-social behaviour.

  17.  Business Improvement Districts (BIDs) are an innovative town centre management initiative where local businesses work with their local authority in BID areas to identify and fund responses to local issues, including those associated with anti-social behaviour such as alcohol related violence. Four areas have had success in establishing a BID. Some of the pilots have a particular focus on problems associated with the night-time economy.

ANTI-SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR AND HOUSING

  18.  We want to live in safe, decent homes and neighbourhoods regardless of the type of housing we live in. This is why ODPM has introduced a number of measures to deal with anti-social behaviour specifically in relation to housing. These measures are designed to work as a package across housing tenures, and with tools introduced by other Government Departments, notably the Home Office and DEFRA.

Owner-occupation

  19.  While some tools available to tackle ASB are dependent on tenure, many enforcement mechanisms, such as Acceptable Behaviour Contracts (ABCs), Anti-social Behaviour Orders (ASBOs), Parenting Orders and types of injunction are available for use by local authorities, the police and social landlords regardless of the "perpetrator's" or the "victim's" housing status.

Social housing

  20.  Social landlords have a key role in identifying and tackling anti-social behaviour in the communities in which they work, particularly because the vulnerable and disadvantaged are suffering disproportionately from anti-social behaviour. Many landlords are already effectively working with other agencies to prioritise anti-social behaviour and are successfully tackling such behaviour.

  21.  A number of powers are available specifically to social landlords to protect their tenants and the wider community, but such powers must be used as part of a wider strategy to prevent problems and to provide support where it is needed. New tools include those measures introduced by Part 2 of the Anti-social Behaviour Act (2003) such as flexible new housing injunctions, demoted tenancies and a duty to publish policies and procedures. New measures under the Housing Act 2004 will also be available for use soon giving landlords the right to refuse a secure tenant's request for a mutual exchange in certain cases of anti-social behaviour and measures to suspend tenants' right to buy on anti-social behaviour grounds.

  22.  Enforcement, though essential in protecting communities, is not the only means of tackling anti-social behaviour. Landlords can do a great deal to ensure that problems are prevented from escalating, thereby avoiding the point where eviction becomes the only option and preventing homelessness. This might involve mediation services, or diversionary projects for young people and helping them to make it through often-difficult transitions in life.

  23.  We are working closely with the Home Office, via the TOGETHER campaign. Ten "TOGETHER" trailblazer areas for 2004-05 and 2005-06 were announced in September 2004 by the Home Secretary. They provide funding for new intensive support projects for families with children on the cusp of eviction and for families with children in temporary accommodation who have been evicted because of anti-social behaviour. The aim is to stop the anti-social behaviour in the short term, and prevent it recurring in the future by stabilising the lives of the families concerned. On 14 February 2005 the scheme was extended to cover all of the 50 TOGETHER Action Areas.

  24.  In January 2004 the ODPM commissioned a team of researchers (led by Sheffield Hallam University) to undertake a two year study into the provision of specialist resettlement projects. The aim of the study is to evaluate residential and outreach projects for tenants at risk of being evicted for anti-social behaviour in terms of costs and benefits, effectiveness and lessons for wider dissemination.

  25.  ODPM will work in partnership with the Home Office's Anti-social Behaviour Unit (ASBU) to issue joint good practice guidance to help all areas develop preventative approaches. This will emphasise the need to combine enforcement action with support measures, taking firm action to protect communities and neighbours from the problems caused by a small minority.

Private Rented Sector

  26.  The Government is committed to helping private landlords to improve their expertise in dealing with anti-social tenants through local authority accreditation schemes and other best practice initiatives. However, we recognise that matters that affect the welfare of tenants and the wider community cannot simply be left to self-regulation and we need to ensure that tools are available to tackle the performance of those who continue to neglect their duties.

  27.  In addition to the tools previously mentioned, the Housing Act will introduce new, complimentary measures, all of which are planned to come into force by the end of the year. These include:

    —  Licensing Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMOs), such as bedsits and student accommodation; mandatory licensing for larger, higher-risk HMOs and discretionary powers to license smaller, multiple-occupied properties.

    —  Selective licensing of privately rented properties by local authorities in designated areas, to help tackle the problems of low housing demand and anti-social behaviour.

    —  Management orders for individual properties to enable local authorities to take over the management of problem properties.

    —  Enabling local authorities to take management control of long-term empty homes that may, in some instances, be contributing to ASB.

  28.  Under both HMO licensing and Selective licensing, licences may contain a condition requiring landlords to take reasonable and practicable steps to combat or reduce anti-social behaviour emanating from the property, for instance by reporting such ASB to the appropriate authorities. And if landlords fail repeatedly to tackle anti-social behaviour by tenants, local authorities will be able to revoke their licence and even take over management of the property themselves.

PREVENTING ANTI-SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR THROUGH NEIGHBOURHOOD RENEWAL PROGRAMMES

  29.  Our Neighbourhood Renewal programmes focus on the most deprived areas, and give people the power and money to turn their neighbourhoods around. £1.875 billion of Neighbourhood Renewal Funding (NRF) resources have been allocated over the period 2001-06, with a further £1 billion available for 2006-08 (an announcement is expected later in the year on the allocations). During 2003-04 (the year for which the latest information is available), around 19% of NRF resources were spent on crime reduction related activity—roughly £85 million.

  30.  These extra resources for the most deprived communities are being successfully used to tackle anti-social behaviour. For instance, £1.5 million of NRF was used by Wakefield Local Strategic Partnership (LSP) to fund Neighbourhood Environmental Action Teams. The teams worked closely with core environmental service agencies to provide a "rapid response" approach to dealing with problems identified by public calls to the 24 hour ASB hotline. The problems promptly dealt with included graffiti, fly-tipping, abandoned vehicles and litter. In the first eight weeks of the teams existence, a total of 1,322 calls were responded to, including 464 "out of hours" responses.

  31.  Other neighbourhood renewal initiatives are also successfully addressing anti-social behaviour. Neighbourhood wardens provide a highly visible, uniformed, semi-official presence in residential and public areas, town centres and high-crime areas. Wardens are seen as the friendly face of regeneration and are therefore often more approachable than the police. Many have set up youth diversionary activities such as after school clubs, youth shelters, junior warden schemes and sporting teams. There is a clear link between wardens and ASB improvements in that people who say that wardens make them feel safer are more likely to say the problems of teenagers have got better.

  32.  Neighbourhood Management Pathfinders are working with local agencies to improve and link services at a local neighbourhood level. For example, Great Lever Bolton Pathfinder is addressing anti-social behaviour by working with Bolton Anti-social Behaviour Unit. The Pathfinder is piloting anti-social behaviour contracts, an initiative which also involves school liaison officers, the Police and housing services.

  33.  In addition, the New Deal for Communities (NDC) programme provides £2 billion to 39 of the most deprived communities over 10 years. The aim is to reduce the gap between the life experiences of those living in these neighbourhoods and those in the rest of England. Whilst each NDC partnership will have problems unique to their area, most NDC's tackle anti-social behaviour as part of their overall strategy to tackle problems in a co-ordinated approach.

  34.  The New Deal for Communities are delivering outcomes that make a real impact on the people living in their neighbourhood, including on anti-social behaviour. For example, In East Manchester, the NDC has funded a dedicated police researcher to examine crime in the area who found that 4% of local criminals were responsible for 40% of the detected crime in the area. As a result, the NDC funded East Manchester Burglary, Robbery and Autocrime (EMBRACE) Project which now tracks 33 local persistent offenders. The project has issued 46 voluntary "acceptable behaviour" contracts in the NDC area since October 2003, with only five being broken.

  35.  The majority of NDCs fund youth diversion projects using a wide range of activities to reach a broad section of young people including those on Anti-social Behaviour Orders, repeat offenders and self excluders and are popular with the young people themselves. For example, Middlesbrough NDC runs a Youth Inclusion Project which includes a Splash school with sports activities, leadership and citizenship skills, career/life management and a learning mentor scheme. Hull NDC supports young people through a fishing club, youth club, a Cyber club, drop in facilities and the Preston Road motorbike club. Support to young people is also given through Anti-social Behaviour Contracts to prevent escalation to an ASBO.

  36.  NDCs are also using certain legal powers to deal with anti social behaviour involving privately owned properties. For example, Brighton NDC has taken steps to enforce covenants against anti-social behaviour, which were imposed when former council properties were sold under the Right to Buy, and which are now rented through private landlords, and Doncaster NDC is currently using Notices under Section 215 of the Town and Country planning Act 1990 requiring owners of empty property to remedy its condition.

BEGGING AND HOMELESSNESS

  37.  Anti-social behaviour also has an impact on city centres where problems such as begging and street drinking are often perceived by the public to be associated with homelessness. Research has shown that the majority of individuals involved with begging or street drinking are not sleeping on the streets and indeed without assertive interventions to reduce their anti-social behaviour they may enter a downward spiral that ends with them as rough sleepers. ODPM will continue to work with ASBU to promote best practice and targeted interventions in key city centres to prevent homelessness and reduce anti-social behaviour. Work will focus on action which prevents homelessness and reduces anti-social behaviour such as begging, street drinking and drug use. Key areas will be monitored to measure performance and the areas to be targeted will be reviewed on a regular basis.

22 February 2003


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 5 April 2005