Select Committee on Home Affairs Written Evidence


49.  Memorandum submitted by the Wine and Spirit Association

  I am writing on behalf of the Wine and Spirit Association (WSA) in relation to your Committee's inquiry into Anti-social Behaviour. If the Committee were to expand its remit to any possible link between alcohol and anti-social behaviour, the WSA would be happy to appear to give evidence.

  The WSA represents over 200 members involved in the UK wine and spirit industry including producers, importers, brand owners and retailers. Although your inquiry is dealing with anti-social behaviour rather than alcohol issues, the WSA and its members have been involved in a number of initiatives recently that tackle alcohol-related harm and feel we could make a useful contribution to your deliberations. The WSA is keen to ensure the alcohol trade takes a positive and visible role in tackling alcohol-related anti-social behaviour and believe we have made significant advances in recent years.

  The WSA have worked on a number of issues that touch your inquiry, short summaries of which are reviewed below:

    —  In conjunction with the Association of Convenience Stores and the British Retail Consortium we have recently launched guidance for the off-trade in promoting responsible retailing. This provides retailers with the tools to actively promote sensible drinking. Our paper has been welcomed by the Licensing Minister, Richard Caborn, as "a real commitment from the industry to promote corporate and social responsibility . . . and it has my full support."

    —  The WSA has long campaigned for a national proof of age card. Our concern is that in their pursuit of a National ID Card, the Government has sidelined proof-of-age suggestions. The Association believes that lead time for a National ID Card is too long to address the immediate need and furthermore, a strong government campaign on a "No ID, No Sale" theme is lacking.

    —  The danger of large tax differentials is the incentive they provide to criminal gangs to import goods which are then not retailed through responsible outlets. Smuggled goods are more likely to end up in the hands of underage drinkers. We are concerned that calls for increased taxes or minimum price schemes, besides being illegal, will simply fuel smugglers profits. In addition, questions remain over the legality of minimum pricing measures. The wine and spirit sector are already a significant contributor to tax revenue, therefore the WSA believes the sector should not be penalised through additional levies.

    —  An additional criticism of minimum pricing is that it penalises those who drink sensibly. Those participating in anti-social behaviour are less likely to respond to increasing prices by decreasing consumption.

    —  The Association welcomes this summer's crackdown on irresponsible drinking, although we dispute the message suggested by headline figures that a third of all off-licenses were caught selling to under-18s. Whilst we accept that this figure is still too high it is important to note that the vast majority of these offences came from targeted sting operations carried out against known problem retailers. The police visited 7,153 off licences in total and at only 4% of these an offence was found to have been committed. We would like to stress that the WSA does support the Government in making every effort to tackle irresponsible retailers.

    —  The off-trade has sought help from the police and local authorities to tackle gangs who congregate near retail premises late at night. There was a suggestion in the Licensing Act Guidance to Local Authorities that such groups be tackled through the closure or restriction of licensable activity in the afflicted premises. However we found this recommendation to be remarkable in its short-sightedness. Premises already suffering from groups intimidating prospective customers would be further penalised by having revenue streams restricted. We believe that such a move would lead to further economic downturn in such areas, in all probability exacerbating any problems of anti-social behaviour. Vibrant mixed retail development has been shown to be an integral part of economic regeneration and subsequent tackling of anti-social behaviour.

    —  On licensing regulations, the WSA believes that the granting of new licenses, rather than capping the number, is important in order to prevent degradation due to lack of competition.

    —  Anti-social behaviour can best be tackled through self-regulation and responsible retailing. The Portman Group is ideally placed as the engine of self-regulation, especially if strengthened by the full participation of the industry. We feel it is necessary to allow sufficient time for the strategy unit's proposals to be implemented and produce results, rather than moving too quickly to further initiatives.

  The WSA recognises that alcohol does not form part of the Government's White Paper on tackling anti-social behaviour. We believe that this is the correct position, as the issues outlined above are most effectively tackled through the process laid out under the Alcohol Harm Reduction Strategy and ongoing reform of the Licensing system. However, should you choose to expand your inquiry to include alcohol related issues, I would be happy to appear before the committee to give further evidence.

1 October 2004





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 19 January 2005