Select Committee on Health Written Evidence


Memorandum by the NHS Alliance (WP 101)

  1.  The NHS Alliance represents the frontline of the NHS. It is the voice of clinicians, managers and lay people working in primary care and of Primary Care Trusts (PCTs). Most PCTs are currently members and 98% belong to NHS Alliance Networks which includes a Public Health Network led by professor Sian Griffiths.

  2.  The NHS Alliance welcomes the White Paper and commends the government on its publication. We believe that to achieve the goals aspired to will require sustained commitment to improving health, keeping this as a mainstream policy thread at national level across government departments and at local level through Local Strategic Partnerships.

3.   Are the proposals appropriate, will they be effective, are they Value for Money?

  The proposals sensibly build on existing policy initiatives such as Every Child Matters in a number of areas. This is to be welcomed but there is a need to ensure that policy, targets and performance management criteria all pull in the same direction.

    (i)    This is a particular issue with regard to the Quality and Outcome Framework for the new GP Contract. This framework is made up of a number of points, which have monetary value, that are awarded on the basis of delivering specified outcomes. There are for example 72 points for asthma management and 105 points for hypertension management. The Alliance is concerned that there are only 41 points allocated for mental illness. This represents around 5% of the total points which is in contrast with the fact that GPs are estimated to spend 30% of their time dealing with mental health problems. In addition the 41 points are made up of 23 points for reviewing patients with severe long term mental problems, 11 points for lithium monitoring and seven points for production of a register of patients with severe long term problems. This does not reflect the bulk of mental health problems that GPs deal with, which are largely related to stress, anxiety and depression. This means that there are no incentives for GPs to look at how they might strengthen and support individuals through promoting self-esteem and through encouraging wider participation by referral to exercise programmes and arts on prescription programmes. Research evidence increasingly suggest that mental health is a key determinant of good health outcomes and that people who are stressed, anxious and depressed find it harder to make healthy choices. We recommend that the Department of Health needs to review the Quality and Outcome Framework to look at how it might more effectively incentivise mental health promotion.

    (ii)    The Alliance also has concerns about how best use can be made from the introduction of practice based commissioning from 1 April 2005. The Alliance view expressed in our evidence to the Choosing Health consultation was that commissioning for health needed to be separated from commissioning for sickness and that it should be a joint responsibility of PCTs and local authorities. There is an opportunity to develop co-terminosity between local authority local areas structures and locals clusters of practices so that practices in partnership with local authorities and the local community can develop locally appropriate ways of improving the health of the local community and of managing demand for expensive hospital care. This approach would be consistent with the White Paper recommendations on the development of local area agreements. We recommend that the Department of Health should be asked to explore how practice based commissioning could be developed into an effective model for improving the health of the local community and for addressing inequalities in health.

    (iii)    The Alliance is concerned about the total number of proposals in the White Paper. We hope that the delivery plan will outline clear priorities. We also hope that PCTs will be encouraged to build on the good work that is already going on across the country rather than necessarily introduce a whole new set of intiatives.

4.   Is the infrastructure sufficient?

    (i)    The Alliance welcomes the introduction of Spearhead PCTs and coterminous local authorities in the areas of greatest social disadvantage. These areas because they have the poorest health also have the greatest demand for existing services and therefore the least capacity to focus on health improvement. They will therefore need more infrastructure support in order to improve the health of the local population. We would welcome clarification of the sort of support that they can expect.

    (ii)    The Alliance believes that public health capacity needs to be strengthened both by increasing the specialist public health function and by developing new roles and raising the awareness of all frontline staff to the importance of public health and health improvement. In particular we believe that more opportunity should be provided for GPs and community nurses to develop competence in public health. These practitioners working with PCT Directors of Public Health could then provide a local support function for practice based commissioning for health.

    (iii)    Health trainers provide an excellent opportunity for PCTs to explore how unemployed people in disadvantaged local communities can be provided with training and employment opportunities so that they can act as health link workers between the local community and frontline staff. We believe that this initiative needs to take account of the many other people already working in community development and of the many examples of good practice. This is not necessarily a new cohort of people to be employed by the NHS, they could instead be employed by the voluntary and community sector. As the White Paper rightly points out the voluntary and community sector are often much better than the statutory sector at engaging with groups of people who face most difficulties or who do not access traditional sources of advice on health.

    (iv)    We welcome the proposals for increasing skills in the community and for improving leadership for health. We would wish to be reassured that training in these areas will be available to local authority staff and to staff in the voluntary and community sector and that resources will be made available to all staff who have a key role to play in local partnership working.

    (v)    We also welcome the establishment of an Innovations Fund and the plans to develop good practice. This is consistent with the NHS Alliance approach which has aimed to foster a "can do" approach in Primary Care Trusts through the publication and dissemination of "CANDO!" which disseminates examples of good practice being delivered by PCTs.

    (vi)    We welcome the plan to employ more school nurses and to develop more healthy schools and extended schools. We hope that the work of the nurses will be integrated with GP practices and with other primary health and social care professionals and with the existing good work going on in Sure Start programmes.

February 2005





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 2 June 2005