Select Committee on International Development First Report


Conclusions and recommendations


1.  It is important that the Commission for Africa adds value, playing to its strengths and supporting rather than undermining NEPAD. (Paragraph 12)

2.  The Commission for Africa's report must include a comprehensive checklist showing what commitments the G8—collectively and individually—has made to Africa, across a range of issues including aid, trade, debt, agricultural subsidies, arms exports, access to essential medicines, and money laundering, and showing also what progress has been made to date in implementing those commitments. (Paragraph 13)

3.  We urge the Commission for Africa to press for action on global governance, to ensure that Africa has a louder voice in international organisations such as the United Nations, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. (Paragraph 14)

4.  Given the fundamental role that the private sector must play in Africa's development, we were surprised that African businessmen and women were not better represented on the Commission. … We trust that the voice of business—particularly African business—will be sufficiently prominent. (Paragraph 16)

5.  The Commission for Africa, in its focus on partnership and the responsibilities of the developed world, must not shy away from addressing the issue of governance in developing countries. (Paragraph 18)

6.  If governance in Africa is to be democratic, providing a supportive environment for locally-owned development strategies, rather than simply "good" by the standards of the International Financial Institutions, then the Commission for Africa must ensure that parliaments are not marginalised. Shortcuts to effective governance do not exist. If developed countries want to see sustainable and effective governance in Africa they must, whilst encouraging moves towards good governance, ensure that they do not undermine emerging systems of local accountability. (Paragraph 21)

7.  By committing themselves to policy coherence for development, and establishing an administrative process for resolving rather than tolerating policy incoherence where it exists, governments can become more effective and cost-effective, and—by encouraging debate about competing priorities—more accountable too. (Paragraph 28)

8.  Initiatives on policy coherence for development such as those underway at the OECD and at the Global Development Network, can play an important role in helping countries to develop best practice in this area. Governments with a real commitment to development, and to policy coherence for development, should support such initiatives. The Commission for Africa should encourage G8 governments to do so. (Paragraph 34)

9.  The reports by the UK and the European Union on their contribution to meeting the MDGs must pay sufficient attention to MDG8, and be sufficiently detailed, so as to enable stakeholders and parliaments to hold individual governments, as well as the EU as a whole, to account. (Paragraph 43)

10.  Countries' own MDG8 reports are an important first step towards more systematic and independent analysis. The Commission for Africa should encourage the G8 to produce such reports, as a move towards building a real partnership for development, based on two-way accountability between the developed and developing world. The UK and EU need to show leadership on this issue, demonstrating to other members of the G8, and to the United Nations, that they are happy to be held to account for promises made about MDG8. (Paragraph 44)

11.  Governments could learn a great deal from the OECD's work on institutional mechanisms to enhance policy coherence for development. The Commission for Africa should encourage the UK and other G8 governments to consider whether and how they might adopt practices employed by other countries, as presented in the OECD's work on policy coherence for development. (Paragraph 45)

12.  Coherence in support of misguided policies, or in support of policies around which there is no consensus, is counter-productive. Policy coherence must not become a way of depriving developing countries of their policy space, their right to formulate laws and regulations suited to their own contexts and needs, based on their analysis of the evidence. This risk can best be avoided by ensuring that developing countries have an equal role in shaping the agenda, and ensuring that policy-design is driven by evidence, rather than by ideology. (Paragraph 51)

13.  The Commission for Africa should encourage the G8 to design mechanisms of mutual accountability, so that not only do developing countries have to show that they are making good use of the aid they receive, but so that the developed world also has to show that it is working hard to ensure that its development objectives and policies are not undermined by policies relating to other issues. (Paragraph 52)


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 16 December 2004