Select Committee on Northern Ireland Affairs Written Evidence


APPENDIX 6

Memorandum submitted by the Department of the Director of Public Prosecutions

  I refer to your letter to James Scholes dated 3 September.

  The Director has asked me to reply.

  The Director notes that the inquiry conducted by the Northern Ireland Affairs Committee will be into the Parades Commission and Public Prosecutions (Northern Ireland) Act 1998. You write that it will take as its starting point the report of the review conducted by Sir George Quigley published in September 2002.

  The Director notes that the Northern Ireland Affairs Committee's primary concerns will be to examine the response by Government and other interested parties to the Quigley Review; the case for implementing key recommendations of the Quigley Review; and, the legislative (or other) steps necessary to implement such recommendations, if appropriate.

  The Director has considered the Quigley Review, and, in particular Chapter 27 concerning Offences.

  The Director agrees with Sir George's observations at Chapter 27.10 where he writes that he doubts if much would be achieved by the creation of further offences in the context of parades. He accepts that it is important that those guilty of any of the wide range of existing offences should be identified and prosecuted.

  He also agrees, as Sir George states at Chapter 27.11. that the guidance in the Commission's Code of Conduct for those participating in a procession and those participating in lawful protests against a procession should draw attention to the law concerning processions and protests and to other relevant legislation. Accordingly, the Director is in agreement with Chapter 30 paragraph 33 of the main recommendations.

15 September 2003





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 11 January 2005