Select Committee on Northern Ireland Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 300-319)

MS SANDRA PEAKE, WITNESS A, WITNESS B, WITNESS C, WITNESS D, WITNESS E, WITNESS F AND WITNESS G

21 FEBRUARY 2005

  Q300 Chairman: He lives in the north?

  Witness C: He was released and he lives in the north now.

  Q301 Chairman: Okay. I think you need to leave that with us because if governments are not providing enough assistance then governments ought to. As it happens, I am seeing Senator Mansergh next weekend, so I will talk to him about it because I think you should be getting help. This is a very particular case where you need international help so you need someone from somebody's Foreign Office to do the diplomatic bit of it all, but it should not be impossible and they should be trying. Are there any other families of the disappeared who are in any sort of similar situation where the government could be doing more?

  Witness B: Yes, Chairman. Can I raise an issue in particular to the situation concerning my relative, *  *  *  *, my nephew? I wrote to Angela Smith quite recently in relation to an issue pertaining to financial support. The issue is that the government quite recently in terms of the Tsunami disaster made arrangements for victims' relatives in relation to the seven-year time period to declare someone officially deceased and get documentation in relation to that. That would be of great benefit to the *  *  *  * family. My nephew has two young sons. The rest of the family obviously will support those children in terms of their future needs but it would be of great benefit to the *  *  *  * family if the government would consider moving in that direction in order to support some documentation being made available in this case.

  Q302 Chairman: Where do you live, *  *  *  *?

  Witness B: I live in Belfast but my family are originally from Northern Ireland.

  Q303 Chairman: Who is your Member of Parliament?

  Witness B: The Reverend Smyth.

  Chairman: There you go. That is not something for the Committee to do. That is something for the Reverend Martin Smyth to do.

  Q304 Reverend Smyth: The family lives in Northern Ireland; that is what you are saying?

  Witness B: Yes.

  Q305 Reverend Smyth: Leave your details with me please.

  Witness B: Yes.

  Q306 Chairman: We are having a general inquiry. It has got very specific because that is such an unusual point that * * * * * has raised. * * * * *, the right thing for you to do is to talk to the Reverend Martin Smyth, go and see him as your constituency MP and he should be able to advance that. It is not for this committee.

  Witness B: I appreciate that.

  Q307 Chairman: I am interested in taking this up because it is very unusual and it is international and maybe we could help or I could help.

  Witness E: Can we move on? I am speaking for some of the other families as well. We have been asking for some things from the government, like we want to get funding for a worker within WAVE specific to the disappeared. Most of the searches were conducted in the south of Ireland, and that was maybe four years ago. We have asked, where is that information? Who has got access to it? If somebody rings up in two weeks' time and says, "We have some information where your brother is buried", where do I go to find out, what has already been done, what has been dug up, what areas have been covered? We have never got the answers to that.

  Q308 Chairman: Who have you asked?

  Witness E: We have asked Des Browne who would have been in with us at one time.

  Q309 Chairman: And he has not given you an answer?

  Witness E: He has moved on.

  Q310 Chairman: But you have had no answer?

  Witness E: We have had no answer. It has been brought up. On whatever occasion we have been meeting people it is always brought up, and also we would like to have a set contact number if somebody wants to get information.

  Chairman: I think it would be very helpful—and let us take the French case as being separate—if you could consolidate these other cases where you have tried to seek the government's help and have not received satisfaction. Could you write to us about that and we will incorporate it in what we are doing and make some comments and the government will have to answer us because that is what they are required to do? If you could perhaps consolidate all that into a short paper for us we will see what we can do to help.

  Q311 Reverend Smyth: Have you been in touch with the Northern Ireland Office on that very issue since you are in Northern Ireland?

  Witness G: Yes. We were talking two weeks ago to the Secretary of State and I brought it up again with him and he said they are hoping now to consolidate the IRA issues and he is trying to get something working to get us information.

  Q312 Chairman: Are we talking specifically about your case or about the others?

  Witness G: No, about mine.

  Q313 Chairman: If you talk to Mr Murphy about it I will talk to Mr Murphy about it.

  Witness G: Thank you.

  Q314 Mark Tami: Moving on to funding, we touched on this earlier when I heard the figure of £300,000 mentioned and I am sure every group would like more money. What could you do with extra funding?

  Ms Peake: As far as WAVE is concerned it will be continuity of services. If you look at our funding for this year the majority of it will end this year and yet the area is growing. When I say the area is growing I am talking about the numbers of people coming forward for services in addition to those that are continually accessing a range of services. That is one of the big fears that exists within the sector, that they have an expectation that people will be provided for and services will be there.

  Q315 Mark Tami: Is that the size of the money that is allocated or the short term nature of it?

  Ms Peake: The short term nature of it and also the level of funding. When you look at the numbers of people that are coming through WAVE for services, it is important that support service provision is there and also that it is tailored to a range of areas, one-to-one support but also seeing people into group support and re-engaging in the opportunities.

  Q316 Mark Tami: What criteria do you think should be applied by funders to groups?

  Ms Peake: Funding has been spread across quite a number of areas and not all of it is targeted specifically to those directly affected by the Troubles and I think that must be one of the most central criteria, that funding is available to those who are providing services directly to people affected by the Troubles.

  Q317 Mark Tami: So you think there should be tighter control over that?

  Ms Peake: Yes.

  Q318 Reverend Smyth: There is a constant argument as to whether processes for settling issues and dealing with the past should be victim centred. Do you agree with that or should there be a wider approach, bearing in mind that if we centre on the victims and keep asking people to repeat their story maybe that will make them feel more victimised?

  Witness A: Can you define that? What do you mean by "victim"?

  Q319 Reverend Smyth: A victim is anybody but then it goes wider than that. You have communities and relations and such like. The victim is usually the person who is closest, who either has suffered physically or is a very close relative of somebody who has suffered, but then beyond that there is a wider range of family links.

  Witness A: I think in the first instance we mean people directly affected by the conflict. I think they have to be essentially part of the process, that that is the road that we choose to go down. You must bear in mind too that at the minute when it comes to identifying routes that appropriately deal with the past there is a lot of talk but nobody really has any clear understanding of what it is they are talking about. If you talk, for example, in terms of truth committees and stuff like that, there have been so many that have happened around the world that to try and pick one that would be relevant to Northern Ireland is going to be a very difficult thing to do. Essentially it should be victim centred but if you are going down that road then obviously there are other aspects for society to take on board. We need to examine, for example, the role of the churches, the role of the political parties, the role of governments, the role of institutions like the Northern Ireland Housing Executive. It is a ripple effect. As a starting point it should definitely start with identifying the experiences of people who were directly affected, the victims themselves.

  Witness F: You talked about story telling, that it might re-traumatise them. My personal opinion is that it is not story telling; it is grief telling. Part of our problem is that we have been brought up in a culture where we did not tell our stories. When my father was shot in 1969 you did not tell your story; you kept it in-house, you dealt with it. For me, you did not get ease in referring to it; you did not get grieving properly. For me, I would not discount the story telling because I think there are so many people in Northern Ireland who need to tell their stories, that need to be allowed to do so, that need to be told it is all right rather than, "Don't talk about this". There are quite a lot of victims out there who have never told their story. There are also quite a lot like me who have told their story time and time again but you should not discount story telling. Let people be allowed to tell their stories if they want to.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 14 April 2005