Select Committee on Northern Ireland Affairs Written Evidence


APPENDIX 9

Memorandum submitted by Omagh Support and Self Help Group

  I am writing in my capacity as chairman of the above group and as a bereaved father of our 21 year old son Adrian who was murdered in the 1998 Omagh bomb.

  This is a statement of evidence as our experience of the Ombudsman's office and their involvement in the Omagh bomb investigation.

  For the first three years of the police inquiry, the families of this atrocity believed there was an effective investigation by the RUC, we received repeated assurances that everything was being done to catch the bombers.

  A review of the investigation was commissioned in March 2000 by ACC crime again we were told everything was in order, we inquired about co-operation with the Garda to be assured that everything was working well. It was with alarm that we read in a Sunday newspaper on 29 July 2001 that a former security agent named Kevin Fultan was alleging that he had passed on information that a large bomb was being prepared south of the border, he gave this information to his RUC handler and was recorded in the system but not acted upon. When we asked about Fulton, we were told these allegations were not true.

  On 14 August 2001 the Police Ombudsman decided to carry out a formal investigation as a matter of public interest. On the morning of 15 August 2001 the third anniversary I heard the person who was to head this investigation Detective Superintendent Martin Bridger speak on Radio Ulster about how the investigation would work. I never had any contact with the Ombudsman's office or had any knowledge of how it works but felt that the allegations were of such concern that they should be investigated and I publicly supported this investigation because I was assured of it's independence.

  It went on to identify a number of major deficiencies in the investigation and the failure of the Chief Constable to implement the recommendations of the McVicar Review.

  The miss-handling of intelligence by Special branch and the fact the Omagh review team were unaware of the Fulton intelligence, the Ombudsman also revealed that significant intelligence was held by Special Branch and was not shared with the Omagh Investigation team or the reviewing team. The Ombudsman's team also revealed eight other bombings in 1998 which they believed were linked to Omagh.

  The Ombudsman's report was given to the families on 4 September 2001 there then began a very public disagreement between the Chief Constable and the Ombudsman's office. After listening to both parties, the families supported the Ombudsman's findings and as a result of the report and the six recommendations set out in it the criminal investigation by the PSNI is now back on the rails.

  The Investigation Team under the leadership of Superintendent Norman Baxter is making good progress towards convicting one person in the north for the Omagh bombing and has linked the previous bombings as initially identified by the Ombudsman's office. This now very live investigation could have been closed down three years ago, but for the very professional and impartial inquiry by a truly dedicated team of experienced officers from the Ombudsman's office, who continue to be in the very public and often critical spotlight. This work cannot be underestimated and is often thankless, it should be supported and stregenthed by all sections of the community.

  If there is any criticism it is that the Ombudsman's Office has not got the power or recourses to investigate more sensitive areas of intelligence which often impact on serious crime in Northern Ireland such as military intelligence and national security.

19 March 2004





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 23 February 2005