Select Committee on Northern Ireland Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Further supplementary memorandum submitted by the Northern Ireland Policing Board

VIEWS OF NIPB ON MEDIATION PROCESS

At the NIAC Inquiry into the functions of the Office of the Police Ombudsman on 21 July the Board's views on changes to the PONI mediation process were sought. I indicated then that the Board had not considered the matter but that I would seek the views of Members at the September Board.

More recently the Board was advised that the NIAC would be grateful for the Board's views on whether the Ombudsman should have a duty to investigate other types of complaints. All of these issues were considered at our Board meeting on 2 September and I can advise as follows.

MEDIATION

Members noted that the Police (Northern Ireland) Act 2000 currently provides for a mediation process after an investigation has been completed. Members have also noted the cost of PONI investigations and would support the use of mediation (subject to the consent of the parties concerned) at any appropriate stage in the process, rather than only following an investigation.

Members understand the concerns that parties may have in participating in such a process unless they had legal protection to the effect that anything said was protected against disclosure in other proceedings—it is understood that this is the case in the Informal Resolution process—and Members consider that the same protection should be afforded during the mediation process.

Finally Members have noted the initial concerns expressed by PSNI in their desire to ensure that officers would not have to go through three consecutive processes but have noted the comments made by the Deputy Chief Constable at the Inquiry on 21 July that a way forward "that (it) is not a duplication of other processes" has been found.

EXTENDED INVESTIGATIVE ROLE
(a)Retired Police Officers.

(b)Members of the British Army.

(c)Allegations of Police Officer criminal conduct made by, for example, police officers.

The Board did not have a corporate view on extending the investigative role of the Ombudsman in respect of the three categories detailed above. Individual Members of the Board and political parties may respond directly to you on these points.

7 September 2004





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 23 February 2005