Select Committee on Northern Ireland Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 160 - 163)

TUESDAY 30 NOVEMBER 2004

MR KIERAN O'BRIEN AND MR GEORGE JOHNSTON

  Q160  Mr Bailey: There is no reason why you cannot tell us personally and, if you like, corporately.

  Mr O'Brien: Personally, because our family home is right next to the fence, it would be the preferable choice for my family but as a representative of a group that is not necessarily the view of the group.

  Mr Johnston: Purely as an individual, not representing the opinions expressed at any of the public meetings or what people say to me, I think it should be closed because I think it will close itself. I do not think any of the targets that have been set for financial viability will be met unless—I am reminded what the Duke of Medina-Sedomia said when the Spanish Armada set out and Philip II had made a mess of the whole thing. He said, "At least we are setting out in the confident hope of a miracle", whatever that means. I think that part of the problem with Derry City Council is they are confident and they are hopeful but there is something of an oxymoron between confidence and hope of a miracle, that something will happen if only we pull off the trick this time. If we pull off the trick and get these 829,000 passengers we are flying, if we can do that, grand. When I say it should be closed, it should be closed because it is going to close itself unless that miracle in which they have a confident hope occurs.

  Mr Bailey: I must confess, I was not expecting Phillip II of Spain to be quoted in support of arguments on the future of Derry Airport.

  Mr Campbell: We do go back far in Northern Ireland.

  Q161  Mr Bailey: Basically you want it closed or to be continued, as I think you put in your own words, as a failing airport?

  Mr Johnston: Yes.

  Mr O'Brien: Yes. The one thing about this group is we are not "not in our backyard". The proposal which we have offered, and there are more educated gentlemen in this room than us who very much support the expansion of the infrastructure of this airport, is an alternative runway and it is through farmland belonging to our own family and some of our neighbours who have said to Derry City Council, "You can come and negotiate for that farmland tomorrow morning". It is not a case of "not in our backyard", this is a case of "we will have it in our backyard but, please, not in our front garden and in our kitchen".

  Q162  Mr Bailey: At a huge extra subsidy, I take it?

  Mr O'Brien: Yes, but if the airport is going to be as successful as some of the people speaking in support of it have claimed—One thing that is missing from the technical report which has not been mentioned yet is that the technical report states that the current runway will have to be strengthened in the future but no cost has been allowed for that. What we were saying in our submission was as a long-term view, looking over the next 20 years, if you count the cost of re-strengthening that runway added to the cost of the extension of the runway, maybe in the long-term the subsidy may not be all that much different even though it may be more in the short-term.

  Q163  Chairman: We seem to have a battle which is a little bit more modern than that referred to earlier. It seems to be a battle of optimists versus pessimists: do we believe that this airport will be viable or fail. I thank you very much for being with us and helping us to take evidence which, hopefully, will enable us to try to offer some advice as to which side we think is winning that battle. As I did with the last witnesses, I am conscious that there may be things you wish to say that you have not had the opportunity to say. Are there any other comments that you would wish to make?

  Mr Johnston: Yes. One of the major things, not to put too fine a point on it, that we get battered with when we argue against the current proposal is that we fail to recognise the economic benefits that flow from this airport. If you read the newspaper reports from the very beginning, we were told that it was in excess of £12 million a year, that there were figures to back this up and we were left to confront this. There was no way we could do that sum—we could produce arguments to say is it a net figure and how much goes out, that sort of thing—until we got the summary report from PricewaterhouseCoopers. "The passenger survey carried out in November 2003 at the airport indicates visitors to Northern Ireland who use the airport generate a spend in the North West region of £8.5 million per annum. However, the survey indicated that on average 20% of these passengers would not have made the trip had the route not existed. Therefore, the 20% additional spend has been estimated to amount currently to £1.7 million per annum." If you are talking specifically about the Derry area, because a lot of traffic comes through from the Republic, that splits 39/61 and if you do that sum it adjusts down to £1.037 million. That is from PricewaterhouseCoopers. It is not until you get the 829,000 passenger movements per annum that you get anywhere near what they estimate to be an additional spend, because this is here rather than using other routes, of around about £6 million. I just want to make that clear because over and over again we have said that where we get our figures from are what we have been given and if we were given the full report from Derry City Council, not just the Executive Summary, we would be able to answer even more of the questions that have been posed to us.

  Mr O'Brien: Hearing the previous speaker talk about extending the infrastructure and the length of the runway, one point that has not come up is the current length of the runway, which is longer than the runway at Belfast City Airport which has two million passengers. The City of Derry, from the figures of the Chamber of Commerce, are proposing an optimistic 800,000 passengers. Aberdeen runway is also shorter and I believe there are no plans to extend it. I have good reason to believe that the Ryanair 737 0800 flight is currently operating on a flight from London Stansted to Hamburg Lübeck and Hamburg Lübeck runway is 50 metres shorter than City of Derry Airport. The flight distance from Hamburg to Stansted is longer than the flight distance from Eglinton to Stansted. That is a very strong argument as to why Derry City Council cannot grow the passenger numbers with the current length of the runway they have. I know the previous speaker said that if they did have a bigger runway they could attract more customers to the airport but the PricewaterhouseCoopers' report does say that other operators may require some infrastructure requirements, however there is no evidence at this stage to suggest how likely that will be. I think that is a very, very important point.

  Chairman: It will not have escaped your attention that we are taking the City Council and the Board of the Airport as our next witnesses, so some of those questions may be asked. Thank you very much.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 14 April 2005