Select Committee on Northern Ireland Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 340 - 359)

MONDAY 13 SEPTEMBER 2004

MS HAZEL FRANCEY, MR GERRY MCBRIDE AND MS CLARE MULLEN

  Q340  Reverend Smyth: I understand that is changing. I said these things were done and they were consensual. Nobody was going to object to Christmas lights being turned on—well, some folk might—but we are dealing with the question of how do we bridge the sectarian divide that leads to hate crime. Have the councils any role to play in that?

  Ms Mullen: Through the Community Relations Programme, through the delivery of training programmes, and through developing awareness. Councils have a role to play in educating school children and educating community groupings. That will go some way to preventing hate crime in the district.

  Mr McBride: In our council area at the moment we would want a range of programmes to try and provide people with the information that they need in order to see a way through some of the difficult issues that they are facing. We have a number of programmes that we run and we would use people from the Northern Ireland Council for Voluntary Action (NICVA) and they would run a number of these training sessions in relation to various perceptions, different identities, and they would also look at things like mutual understanding, anti-sectarian awareness, mediation skills and a basic introduction to community relations work. These programmes ensure that the capacity of the community itself is strengthened. We believe that that is an important aspect of what the council can do in terms of providing the community itself and groups within area with the ability to understand the differences and cope with that when it occurs on a more local basis within their own areas. We feel that that helps with building relationships and we believe that again is a key factor in promoting good relations across the district.

  Q341  Mr Beggs: Community relations policy has been accused of being a very middle-class concept which fails to recognise the harsh realities of many single identity communities, and is therefore aimed at those who need it least and people who attend community relations training are the converted. Is current community relations policy really targeting those most likely to commit hate crime?

  Ms Francey: In Belfast with our particular interface problems we have a duty to look at those particular communities and the Belfast interface project itself launched its own policy statement within the last couple of months and we have agreed that on those particular problems our council should look seriously at those issues. Next week we are inviting in the director of that project who is going to give a presentation to our steering panel. At the same time we are conducting a major piece of research from Dr Mike Morrissey, who used to be a lecturer at one of our local universities. The aim of that is to try and find if there are other gaps because we realise there are a lot of organisations funding projects in Belfast and we want to find out where our money should be going so that there is no duplication and no overlap. We are trying to use this piece of research to identify areas where our funding should be targeted. I agree in the past there have been accusations that it is middle-class and it is nice and it is safe. All of our steering panel agree that we need to get the best use of resources to make sure that they are used most effectively. We want to look at the areas where it is needed most and I would suspect very strongly that the interface is going to come out as one of the areas where we need to focus our efforts in future.

  Mr Beggs: The empirical evidence show patterns of increasing polarisation in Northern Ireland, an increase in hate crime, deteriorating attitudes between communities, all of which create circumstances in which hate crime flourishes. Has community relations policy failed?

  Q342  Mr Clarke: Nobody wants to answer that!

  Ms Francey: It has not been terribly successful. You would have to say that really, to be realistic!

  Ms Mullen: Good job you said it!

  Q343  Mr Beggs: Are there particular successes you can point to?

  Ms Francey: Yes, as I said earlier, there are a lot of groups who have been working for years and often behind the scenes. We have a lot of unsung heroes. The fact that relations at the interface this summer and certainly last summer were quieter in Belfast than many of the previous years is owed to a lot of hard work from a lot of individuals living in very difficult areas and doing difficult work at all times of the night.

  Q344  Mr Beggs: My final question would be addressed to Belfast. You say in your submission that the Council is working in partnership with public and private agencies "to address wider public issues and examine the factors that cause division and exclusion". What agencies have been involved in this work and what have you found in terms of the causes of division and exclusion?

  Ms Francey: That is part of the research to which I just referred that we were commissioning that is being jointly financed by ourselves and the Community Relations Council. A lot of other organisations have already expressed interest in the results of this survey which we hope will be available before the end of the year. The Local Strategy Partnership certainly would be interested in the results of that because they are in charge of allocating PEACE money. We mention in the written submission that we have representatives from churches, the business sector and the trade unions on our steering panel and they are on there because we know that they have access to much wider networks and obviously we can cascade our policies and efforts throughout those bodies as well.

  Q345  Mr Bailey: We have already had some indication about the relative levels of mixed housing provision but can you just give a breakdown for each of your authorities.

  Ms Francey: Within Belfast it is estimated now that less than one-third of the population of Belfast lives in areas which are mixed and this split is particularly marked in public sector housing. The Housing Executive estimate that in the rest of Northern Ireland about 70 per cent of estates are segregated and in Belfast they are almost wholly segregated.

  Mr McBride: In Down District the majority of housing areas would be mixed public sector housing areas. Again the majority of the housing estates would be mixed.

  Ms Mullen: Strabane Town itself would not be mixed housing. Some of the smaller rural villages like Down Manor, Ballymagorrey and Sion Mills would have more mixed housing but again I would say the majority of the district would be segregated.

  Q346  Mr Bailey: In the case of Belfast it has definitely become more segregated. I think that is a fair comment. Would that be equally true of the other authorities?

  Mr McBride: In terms of Down it has probably gone the other way.

  Q347  Mr Bailey: Strabane?

  Ms Mullen: Strabane remains segregated. I do not have official statistics.

  Q348  Mr Bailey: To Belfast, if it is accepted that increased housing segregation is symptomatic of worsening community relations—and perhaps you can debate that—what specific initiatives have you taken to address this?

  Ms Francey: In Belfast?

  Q349  Mr Bailey: Yes.

  Ms Francey: The Northern Ireland Housing Executive has recently launched a programme to try to promote community relations in housing. The city council in Belfast does not have responsibility for housing.

  Q350  Mr Bailey: Have you taken any community-orientated initiatives because some of the problem, as we heard in interviews earlier, was that in effect the housing authority was trying to improve housing but community relations were so bad that it still left this segregation.

  Ms Francey: We have not made any specific efforts regarding housing from the council's point of view but we would certainly be supportive of the Housing Executive's efforts.

  Q351  Mr Bailey: Would there be scope for joint initiatives with the Northern Ireland Housing Executive?

  Ms Francey: Yes. At our last steering panel meeting we talked about doing some pilot projects along those lines but nothing definite so far.

  Q352  Mr Bailey: To any of you—any particular thoughts about giving existing mixed residential areas support to ensure that they do not become polarised as has happened in some cases in Belfast?

  Mr McBride: In terms of Down District we have very strong links particularly between what you might call the single identity areas where the various tenants and community groups would meet on a regular basis, and that does help to improve relations. That happens right across the district. The council itself has a mailing list of 185 groups across our district and that would go out regularly explaining the different programmes and schemes that are on offer and also there is a lot of joint working between those different areas. We feel there is a lot of very positive work going on.

  Ms Mullen: Strabane would be similar to Down. There are a number of Northern Ireland tenant action projects in place throughout the district which bring members of the community together to talk about housing issues and there is a multi-agency approach. We also have a regular community sheet that would go out to over 100 community organisations to keep residents and community groups informed of what is happening and what is available.

  Q353  Mr Bailey: To Belfast just to, if you like, broaden the discussion slightly. In your submission you mention that in a partnership effort with the Northern Ireland Housing Executive you have cleaned up 21 murals and removed 7,000 metres of kerb painting on the Lower Shankhill Road. Aside from its obvious environmental impact what other impacts did this work have? Did it provoke resistance and is this policy continuing?

  Q354  Ms Francey: It did not provoke resistance because it was done in consultation and with the support of local community groups. It was very widely welcomed. I think I mentioned in the submission that it won a Tidy Britain award and the Chairman presenting the trophy said it was not only an environmental improvement but a symbol of hope versus the legacy of the past. It is not continuing as such but our contract services department has a Better Belfast Campaign and is certainly developing a programme to brighten up the neighbourhood in Belfast. We have other departments in the council who are developing what we call a Strategic Neighbourhood Action Programme (SNAP) and an Arterial Routes Programme where that kind of regenerational approach is taken throughout the city. That was a pilot problem and it seemed to work very well.

  Q355  Mark Tami: We have heard a lot about Section 75 of the Northern Ireland Act today. How successful do you think it has been in combating `hate crime'?

  Mr McBride: I think Section 75 is a very strong piece of legislation. What it did perhaps for the first time is it identified many key groups that in the past have received less attention than would be required. The essence of Section 75 is to improve public policy making and therefore it did focus the minds of the elected representatives when they were deciding on what particular policies to put forward to ensure that they were quality-proofed and effective. So I think it is a very important piece of legislation. Tied into that is the good relations responsibility which is incorporated within Section 75 and I think if it is taken to its logical conclusion it should improve the overall delivery of services and at the same time create a more inclusive society for everyone and one that is responsive to the specific needs of various groups.

  Q356  Mark Tami: Would your colleagues agree with that?

  Ms Mullen: I would agree with Gerry that Section 75 has gone a long way in terms of making the councils and other bodies more focused on disability and race. Strabane District Council would make the community organisations aware of what Section 75 is and how it works and how they would need to take it into consideration if they have a building and they are employing staff and that kind of thing.

  Ms Francey: I think the main issue from our point of view has been the equality training that all staff and all elected members have undergone to make them aware of their obligations under the new legislation and make them aware of the nine groups that have been designated. The introduction of the consultation process has broadened things out and made people aware, not only of their statutory obligations under the legislation, but it has improved our communication with the groups affected. Our equality officer would have a very good working relationship with the various Section 75 groups.

  Q357  Mr Tynan: How successful have the Community Safety Partnerships been, and how would you see them developing? Do you see their role developing further?

  Ms Mullen: Strabane District Council have just adopted the Community Safety Partnership, so we are lagging behind other councils in that respect because of the politics. We feel that the establishment of the Community Safety Partnership provides the opportunity for multi-agency working. Community safety will be a new concept for Strabane District Council to take on board and we hope that it will help us focus on the community safety of the area as a whole through a multi-agency approach.

  Ms Francey: It is probably too early to say. We are just in the stages of having adopted a Community Safety Partnership in the last year or so, so it is very much in its infancy, but it does seem to be working well.

  Mr McBride: I would agree. The working definition we have for community safety is "protecting people's right to live in confidence and without fear for their own or other people's safety". It is about ensuring that everyone within the area is being dealt with in a proper manner and that where issues arise, there is support for them and that crime prevention measures are brought into effect before certain issues get out of hand. Using the partnership approach, using people like the councils, the local health authority, the housing executive, the police service etcetera, ensures that there is greater emphasis on preventing crime and also ensuring that the communities themselves can play their own part in preventing crime within those localities. So we believe that a Community Safety Partnership is very important to the district.

  Q358  Mr Tynan: Is there any way we can improve on it? Can the role be developed further? I know it cannot as far as Belfast is concerned, but how do the other councils see that?

  Mr McBride: There are a range of initiatives that are being considered by our own Community Safety Partnership. We have just embarked on a community safety audit. Stage two of that involves consultation with various groups throughout the district. Running on from that will be a specific action plan. We have already identified a number of programmes, some of which are cross-border initiatives, to try and look at best practice not only within our own district but across the UK and across other districts in Northern Ireland. We have also looked at a range of specific programmes, such as target hardening for particular properties. There is a scheme that has just got off the ground called the "Good Morning Down" scheme. This is a telephone help-line type scheme where vulnerable people within the community will be able to receive some telephone support, particularly in the morning time and we hope to extend that to people from ethnic minorities or other people who feel vulnerable. We believe that that type of scheme shows that the community cares about people and it cares about giving support to people who perhaps feel under pressure either because of their age, because of their disability or because of their ethnicity, or perhaps they have been the victim of crime in the past. We believe schemes like that, properly targeted and focused, can have a great impact in dealing with the fear of crime, which in many cases is a big issue particularly for elderly people.

  Q359  Mr Tynan: Hazel, Belfast Council is critical of the Government's funding and allocation as regards the community relations sector and argues that it "is indicative of the priority given to it and is considerably less than that assigned to the equality sector". What additional funding do you require?

  Ms Francey: We were just making the point in the submission that the amount allocated is tiny compared to the amount given to various other sectors and that obviously reflects the priority given to it by central government and by government at Northern Ireland level. If you are serious about addressing a problem and about resolving issues, nothing happens without resources. If you need to tackle the problem, you need to pump some resources into it. We were just making that general point.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 14 April 2005