Select Committee on Office of the Deputy Prime Minister: Housing, Planning, Local Government and the Regions Second Report


1 The Committee's Work during 2004


Introduction

1. This is the ODPM: Housing, Planning, Local Government and the Regions Committee's second full year since its establishment in July 2002. The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) is responsible for a wide range of Government policy. The Committee has sought during the year to cover as much of the Department's remit as possible.

2. We have had a busy year. We have undertaken nine inquiries during 2004 which have led to published reports: in addition, we published two reports relying on evidence taken in 2003, together with our Annual Report 2003. We have begun four further inquiries into The ODPM's Annual Report, Homelessness, The Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment and The Standards Board for England which will lead to reports early in 2005. We also held 'one-off' evidence sessions on the Building Regulations and the Egan Review: Skills for Sustainable Communities and one with the new chairman and chief executive of English Partnerships. Our reports on Postal Voting and Social Cohesion were debated in Westminster Hall on 16 September and 16 October. The subjects we have covered are set out in Table 1 below. We would like to take the opportunity in this report to thank all those who have helped us in our work during 2004.







Table 1: Subjects covered by the ODPM Committee, 2004
Subject
Evidence sessions in 2004
Sub-committee?
Outcome
The Fire Service
-
No
Report, January 2004
Coalfield Communities
-
Yes
Report, March 2004
Decent Homes
5
No
Report, May 2004
Social Cohesion
3 *
No
Report, May 2004
Postal Voting
3
No
Report, May 2004
The Role and Effectiveness of the Housing Corporation
5
Yes
Report, June 2004
Local Government Revenue
5
No
Report, July 2004
Supporting Vulnerable and Older People: The Supporting People Programme
1
Yes
Report, July 2004
The Role of Historic Buildings in Urban Regeneration
3
Yes
Report, July 2004
Draft Planning Policy Statement 6: Planning for Town Centres
1
No
Report, September 2004
Gypsy and Traveller Sites
3
No
Report, November 2004
Building Regulations
1
No
Minutes of Evidence, March 2004
The Egan Review: Skills for Sustainable Communities
1
No
Minutes of Evidence, April 2004
English Partnerships
1
Yes
Minutes of Evidence, June 2004
ODPM Annual Report and Accounts 2004
2
No
-
Draft Regional Assemblies Bill
4
No
-
Homelessness
4
No
-
The Role and Effectiveness of CABE
2
Yes
-
The Role and Effectiveness of the Standards Board for England
1
Yes
-

* The Committee held a further 3 evidence sessions for this inquiry in September 2003

Visits

3. The opportunity to travel both in the UK and abroad as part of our work, and to see examples of good and bad practice is something that we regard as important, a means of gathering information and views - a "reality check". During 2004 we visited Norwich, Great Yarmouth and Ipswich and also Battersea Power Station as part of our inquiry into the Role of Historic Buildings in Urban Regeneration. As part of that inquiry we also went to Krakow, Warsaw and Tallinn in March to see how they managed their historic environments. The Committee were also invited by the Prince of Wales to visit his model village in Poundbury, Dorset.

4. We undertook visits to Appleby Horse Fair in Cumbria, Hampshire and Dublin in relation to our inquiry into Gypsy and Traveller Sites. We went to Birmingham as part of our inquiry into Homelessness. We went to Singapore, Australia, New Zealand and the US as part of our inquiries into local taxation, postal voting and regional assemblies which enabled the Committee to consider alternative systems of raising local revenue and arrangements for regional government in those countries. The Committee has recently announced an inquiry into Electoral Registration[1] which has drawn upon the information gathered on the visit.

Core tasks

5. Following a resolution of the House of May 2002,[2] the Liaison Committee has determined that select committees should be expected to perform a number of 'core tasks'. These are to carry out inquiries into (a) Government policy proposals, (b) areas seen to require examination because of deficiencies, (c) departmental actions, (d) associated public bodies (of the Department), (e) major appointments, and (f) implementation of legislation and major policy initiatives. The Liaison Committee also proposed that details be given of the examination of any draft legislation, expenditure and performance against Public Service Agreement targets. An analysis of our performance of these core tasks is set out in Table 2 below. Further analysis of our work is contained in an Annex to this report, which sets out selected recommendations of previous reports, together with the Government response.


Identification of inquiries

Government Policy Proposals

6. Our inquiry into Decent Homes looked at the Government's target set in 2000 and extended in 2002 to bring all social housing and 70% of private dwellings occupied by vulnerable housings up to the Decent Homes Standard. The inquiry looked at the adequacy of the standard; the means by which the Government plans to meet it and whether it is likely to be met. In its response the ODPM emphasised that the Decent Homes Standard was only a minimum level and highlighted the resources available for achieving it.

7. Our inquiry into the Fire Service focused on the Government's White Paper 'Our Fire and Rescue Service' which was published in June 2003.[3] The inquiry considered whether the Government's plans to reorganise the fire service would make it more locally responsive and ensure a risk-based approach is adopted to fire cover and the prevention of fires is prioritised. In its response, the Government said that the Fire and Rescue Services Bill would provide Fire and Rescue Authorities with a clear statement about their modern role and grant Fire and Rescue Authorities flexibility to deliver a risk-based approach to meet the needs of the communities they serve.

8. Our inquiry into Local Government Revenue was carried out alongside the Government's review into the Balance of Funding which it announced in January 2003. The Committee looked at whether the balance of funding contributed by central Government and raised by local authorities through the business rates and community charge was appropriate and considered alternative systems to raise revenues. The report urged that any reform of local taxation should be guided by four principles of equity, simplicity, accountability and flexibility. The Government said that many of the Committee's concerns would be taken up by a new inquiry to be carried out by Sir Michael Lyons which would consider the detailed case for changes to the present system of local government funding.

9. The Committee held a brief inquiry into Draft Planning Policy Statement 6: Planning for Town Centres. The inquiry was concerned that the policy statement represented a relaxation in planning policies towards out of town shopping centres.

Areas seen by the Committee as requiring examination because of deficiencies

10. This year six of our inquiries were prompted in part by deficiencies in the ODPM or its Agencies. We completed our inquiry into the Coalfield Communities[4] which highlighted the fact that there had been considerable progress in reclaiming the coalfield sites. However, there had been only limited progress in addressing the economic and social needs of the communities. In its report the Committee urged that the new developments should meet the needs of the local communities, particularly affordable housing and local employment opportunities. Poor health and the inequitable funding of health services were also a particular concern. With many of the time-limited funding streams from the Government and the EU, the Committee urged that successor funds should be secured. In its response, the Government highlighted the additional investments which English Partnerships would be making to the social fabric in the Coalfield areas and the considerations over successor funding once EU Structural Funds expire.

11. We completed our inquiry into Social Cohesion in 2004 which looked at the progress in addressing the causes of the disturbances in Burnley, Bradford and Oldham in 2001. The inquiry, which had started with three sessions in Oldham in September 2003, was completed with three sessions at Westminster. The report called for long term solutions to the problems rather than quick fixes. It highlighted the need for local authorities to be given greater incentives to break down barriers between different communities and facilitate an open dialogue about the particular needs of different groups. We were concerned that local services should target all groups rather than reinforce segregation by providing separate facilities. At a national level, the report urged Government departments to place greater emphasis on tackling social cohesion and for one department to be given responsibility for promoting it to avoid the current confusion. In its response, the Government accepted the need for long term programmes and pointed out that it was reviewing structures across Departments for promoting community cohesion.

12. We conducted a short inquiry into the ODPM's review of the Supporting People programme which funds support for those in specialist housing and to people in their own homes primarily for older people, people with learning difficulties, people with mental heath problems, and homeless people. The Committee's report supported the Government's review but was concerned that the reductions in the programme would not be fairly distributed and would cause uncertainty for many projects. In its response, the Government said it had a made a three-year funding commitment for the programme and that it was monitoring the application of funding criteria.

13. The Committee's inquiry into the Role of Historic Buildings in Urban Regeneration looked at the major contribution that historic buildings could make to revitalising urban centres. The report raised concerns that the potential was not being maximised; it highlighted the lack of skilled staff in local authorities to facilitate the reuse of historic buildings, and the failure of regeneration frameworks to appreciate the value of historic buildings and unlock this potential. The number of regulatory regimes which impeded the reuse of historic buildings was also of concern. The Committee called for the listed buildings consent scheme to be integrated into the planning system.

14. The provision of sites and facilities for Gypsies and Travellers was the subject of another inquiry. In our report, we highlighted the inadequate information available about Gypsies and Travellers, particularly the size of their communities, the proportion that travel regularly rather than are generally settled on sites, and the interest of the travelling community in permanent homes. We urged the Government to reintroduce a statutory requirement on local authorities to provide sites and suggested that a national Gypsy and Traveller Taskforce was set up to identify potential sites and ensure site vacancies are co-ordinated across the country and in regions and counties as appropriate.

15. With the levels of homelessness reaching the highest levels for the last 20 years, the Committee decided to conduct an inquiry into the causes of homelessness and the effectiveness of Government initiatives in addressing them. The inquiry is looking at the ODPM's priorities for investment in different forms of housing and adequacy of services for the homeless.

Departmental actions

16. In the June 2001 General Election, turnout was the lowest recorded since the advent of universal adult suffrage; only 59.4% of the 44,403,238 registered voters chose to vote, compared with 71.4% in the 1997 General Election. To raise voter turnouts, the ODPM announced the use of postal ballots in the European Parliament and local elections of June 2004 for electors in the North East and East Midlands. The Committee decided to hold an inquiry which focused on such issues as the possibility of electoral fraud and the administrative costs involved with postal ballots. The report urged the Government to take additional precautions to avoid fraud and to develop better systems to help those who may be unable to vote by post as a result of disability or literacy problems. It also urged the ODPM to prepare legislation for the introduction on individual voter registration. In its response the Government said that it was evaluating the success and problems with the elections in the North East and East Midlands before agreeing further all postal ballot elections.

Associated public bodies

17. The Department has few associated public bodies. During the year we have taken evidence from a number of them as part of our broader inquiries, including the Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment (CABE), English Partnerships, the Housing Corporation, the Boundary Commission and the Boundary Committee for England. In 2004 we conducted an inquiry into the Role and Effectiveness of the Housing Corporation. We also started inquiries into the Role and Effectiveness of CABE and the Role and Effectiveness of the Standards Board for England and held a single evidence session with English Partnerships.

18. Our inquiry into the Role and Effectiveness of the Housing Corporation fed into the Government's own 'end to end' review of the Corporation. The Committee looked at a wide range of issues including the Corporation's investment priorities and the effectiveness of its regulatory regime for housing associations. In our report, we urged the Corporation to work more closely with existing public agencies in order to combine resources and expertise. We questioned the priority which the Corporation was giving to larger associations and to the use of off-site manufacturing. In its response, the Government said that it was clarifying the Housing Corporation's role and also ensuring that it is contributing fully to major initiatives by other agencies particularly in the growth areas in the South East and with English Partnerships.

19. We are holding a brief inquiry into the work of CABE which is focusing on the way the organisation reviews the designs of new buildings and inputs its comments into the planning system. We expect to publish our report early in 2005.

20. The inquiry into the Standards Board is looking at its effectiveness in securing high standards of conduct by local councillors and how well it is working with other regulatory frameworks. Our report is planned to be published early in 2005.

Major appointments

21. We have taken evidence from ODPM Ministers on nine occasions during the year, and from Ministers from other departments on five occasions. We have had problems on several occasions in arranging appointments to take evidence from ODPM Ministers.

22. We took evidence from the new chairman of the Housing Corporation early in 2004 and also the new chief executive and chair of English Partnerships in June 2004.

Implementation of legislation and major policy initiatives

23. None of our inquiries during 2004 was primarily focussed on the effect of legislation, but our inquiries into Postal Voting, Local Government Revenue, Gypsy and Traveller sites and the Role of Historic Buildings in Urban Regeneration all embraced an element of review of the legislative framework, and in a number of cases led to conclusions and recommendations which would require changes to the law.

Draft legislation

24. We were asked to undertake pre-legislative scrutiny of the Draft Regional Assemblies Bill, which was announced in the Queen's Speech in November 2003.[5] The draft Bill was published in July 2004.[6] We took evidence in September 2004. Following the results of the referendum in the North East in November, the Government has decided not to take the Bill forward. The Committee is to publish a report on its scrutiny which will put down a set of markers to be considered should the Government propose new forms of regional devolution in the future.

Expenditure

25. Most of our inquiries during the year have involved examination of expenditure in one way or another. Our inquiry into the Annual Report and Estimates 2003 looked at Departmental expenditure and made several recommendations concerning PSA targets and expenditure.[7] We have recently completed the same exercise for 2004.

Public Service Agreements

26. The examination of PSAs and their associated targets were a significant aspect of our inquiries into the ODPM Annual Report and Accounts 2004, and Decent Homes.


1   ODPM Committee Press Notice PN 06, Session 2004-05 Back

2   See Votes and Proceedings, 14 May 2002 Back

3   Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, Our Fire and Rescue Service, Cm 5808, June 2003 Back

4   HC (2002-03) 75-I Back

5   HC Deb, 26 November 2003, Col 4 Back

6   Draft Regional Assemblies Bill, Cm 6285, July 2004 Back

7   ODPM: Housing, Planning, Local Government and the Regions Committee, First Report: ODPM Annual Report and Accounts 2003 - Report together with minutes of evidence and appendices, HC 102 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 21 February 2005