Select Committee on Office of the Deputy Prime Minister: Housing, Planning, Local Government and the Regions Written Evidence


Memorandum by the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (EMP 01)

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

  1.  Since the Committee's last inquiry into empty homes and low demand in 2002, a great deal of progress has been made towards resolving both of these related problems. Nine of the areas where low demand and abandonment are worst have become housing market renewal pathfinders. By March 2008, low demand areas will have received over £1.2 billion from the new Housing Market Renewal Fund. Eight of them have already agreed schemes up to 2006, while a decision on the ninth is expected in Spring 2005. Prospectuses covering the years 2006-10 will be developed during 2005.

  2.  The pathfinders are making good progress, both in terms of dealing with the physical manifestations of low demand and building stakeholder partnerships that can deliver lasting solutions. They are still near the start of a 10 to 15 year programme, however, and all parties involved with the pathfinders will need to raise their game still further if they are to transform weak housing markets. Challenges ahead include increasing the availability of people with the right skills and maximising the involvement of the private sector.

  3.  However, understanding of low demand has advanced quickly and there has been rapid movement from identifying the problem to delivering solutions. Work in pathfinder areas and other places where empty homes are a problem will be made easier by local authorities' new powers under the Housing Act 2004 and the Local Government Act 2003.

  4.   Homes for All, ODPM's five year housing strategy published in January 2005, sets out its plans for dealing with low demand outside the pathfinders. Extra market renewal funding will be available to Regional Housing Boards for investment in additional sub-regions with significant problems, while the Regional Housing Boards will also continue to invest in smaller areas of low demand.

INTRODUCTION—PROGRESS TO DATE

  5.  The first of the main recommendations in the Committee's 2002 report suggested that:

    "Radical intervention is needed in some inner urban areas where the housing market has collapsed to make them attractive to a broad range of existing and potential residents. The housing market renewal approach needed to achieve this must be on a large, conurbation-wide scale. It will take a long time and so must be started as soon as possible and will require significant additional funding, of the order of hundreds of millions of pounds per annum."

  6.  The Government's response has been prompt and has displayed its strong commitment to resolving the problems associated with low demand housing.

  7.  In April 2002, the then Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions announced that nine areas with acute low demand problems had been invited to work with the Government to establish pathfinder projects to tackle low demand. Each pathfinder comprises two or more authorities to allow the problem to be tackled on an appropriate scale. £25 million was made available to help the pathfinders develop schemes to achieve market renewal and establish their presence by achieving some quick wins.

  8.  The Sustainable Communities Plan, published in February 2003, set out the Government's proposals for a new £500 million Market Renewal Fund, which would provide the pathfinders' core funding up to March 2006. With the additional money allocated through the 2004 spending review, the Fund will provide a total of over £1.2 billion to help deal with low demand housing to for the five years to March 2008. This substantial level of funding will deliver transformational change in places where it is most required. It will also help to rebuild confidence in areas of severe low demand and reconnect them with more prosperous parts of towns and cities.

  9.   Homes for All, ODPM's five year housing strategy, was published on 24 January 2005. Chapter 6 reiterates the key messages about low demand from the communities plan, while setting them in the context of the current, rapidly changing, housing market. It also explains ODPM's new proposals, supported by £65 million new funding, for dealing with low demand outside the pathfinders and proposes clear outcome targets for the pathfinder programme.

  10.  All of the pathfinders have now submitted their prospectuses to ODPM and eight have agreed schemes and funding (the exception is Gateway, the pathfinder for Hull and the East Riding, with which ODPM is currently in negotiations). Copies of the executive summaries of each prospectus have been provided to the Committee separately.

  11.  The agreed schemes cover the initial stages of the programme to 2006. All of the pathfinders are different and ODPM decided that it would be inappropriate to stifle innovation by providing detailed guidance. The agreed schemes reflect this diversity. However, independent scrutiny of prospectuses by the Audit Commission has helped to ensure that the programme is robust and deliverable.

  12.  In February 2005, ODPM will write to each pathfinder inviting them to submit updated prospectuses, setting out detailed plans for 2006-08 and outline proposals for 2008-10. These prospectuses will inform the distribution of SR04 market renewal funding to 2008.

  13.  The work of pathfinders and other local authorities faced with the problems associated with empty homes will be facilitated by a number of important legislative changes that have been enacted since the Committee's last report. These include the introduction in the Housing Act 2004 of new legislative powers for local authorities to make management orders in respect of long-term empty homes and to license privately rented accommodation.

  14.  While the generally buoyant housing market over the last few years has clearly helped efforts to deal with low demand and empty homes, there have been some encouraging early signs that the tide is turning. There has been a small but steady decrease for each of the last five years in the total number of homes in England vacant for more than six months. And the number of homes reported as being in low demand in the North and Midlands has fallen from almost a million in 2002 to around 850,000 in 2004.

  15.  Measures are now in place to deliver long-term programmes of renewal and replacement of housing, improving both quality and choice. Progress so far has been promising. Despite the fact that many of the pathfinders have been fully funded for less than a year, they are beginning to make a real impact. Not only are they starting to tackle the physical manifestations of low demand housing, they are bringing together the regional and local players whose support will be imperative to deliver sustainable solutions.

  16.  The pathfinders and other programmes to deal with low demand are still near the beginning of what is likely to be a 10 to15 year programme. Everyone concerned will need to raise their game still further if they are to succeed in achieving the step change necessary to transform weak housing markets. ODPM will provide strong support to help them to meet this challenge.

PARTICULAR ISSUES RAISED BY THE COMMITTEE

 (a)   The scope and scale of the initiatives proposed and underway in the Government's Housing Market Renewal Pathfinder areas and other areas with problems of empty homes

  17.  In 2004, local authorities reported that around 850,000 homes were in low demand. The pathfinder authorities cover around 60% of this total. The intervention areas agreed with pathfinders to cover the large majority of problem areas within their authorities cover approximately half of all low demand.

  18.  The agreed outputs for the pathfinders to March 2006 include:

    —  Over 3,000 new homes constructed and occupied.

    —  24,000 homes refurbished, repaired or improved.

    —  Almost 10,000 properties demolished.

  19.  It will be for the Regional Housing Boards to propose exactly which areas should benefit from the new funding to tackle low demand outside the pathfinders, announced in Homes for All. However, the sub-regions mentioned in the strategy as likely recipients—the Tees Valley, West Yorkshire and West Cumbria—account for around 15% of low demand in England. Other projects, including those funded by Regional Housing Boards from their single pots, will ensure that a still higher percentage of low demand housing is subject to some sort of strategic intervention.

  20.  The pathfinders and wider low demand schemes are essentially capital programmes which can deliver improvements to the housing offer and rebalance supply and demand. However, it is clear that housing measures alone will not lead to transformational change and sustainable communities.

  21.  Some pathfinders are providing support to projects designed to support communities through transition, such as neighbourhood warden schemes. Nevertheless, if they are to succeed, it will be vital for pathfinders to continue to build links with other service providers, notably community organisations, the police and education departments, as well as other regeneration bodies, and ensure that their activities are aligned.

  22.  There are already some good examples of this sort of approach emerging. For example, in North Staffordshire, Renew, the pathfinder and the RDA funded regeneration zone are co-located, work within the same geographical areas and are working towards linked delivery structures.

 (b)   The commitment and contribution of all Government departments and other agencies to tackling the underlying causes of empty homes

  23.  There has been good cooperation across Government as solutions have been sought to the varying and complex issues that contribute to low demand. ODPM and the Home Office have jointly organised a community cohesion seminar for pathfinders, while the Department for Transport has agreed that low demand can be taken into account when allocating discretionary funding. ODPM is also working with the Department for Education and Skills to ensure that proposals to rebuild communities are taken into account in Building Schools for the Future and education provision more generally.

  24.  Two of the pathfinder Chairs recently gave presentations on the programme to a Central Local Partnership meeting attended by Ministers from ODPM, DfES, the Department of Health and a number of other departments.

  25.  English Partnerships, the Housing Corporation and the Regional Development Agencies, all of which receive funding from ODPM, have each made a strong contribution to dealing with low demand, through both their expertise and resources. Between them, they are likely to contribute over £100 million to the pathfinders' activities this year. The Commission for the Built Environment (CABE) has also made an important input to the programme and has provided support to all pathfinders, while leading a successful design task group and seconding staff to Elevate East Lancashire. CABE has also worked with English Heritage and ODPM on the need to retain and make better use of high quality buildings in pathfinder areas.

  26.  The need for a strongly coordinated approach to dealing with low demand will increase as pathfinder and other activity escalates. ODPM will continue to take the lead in ensuring that all relevant Government departments and agencies are aware of developments and contribute, where possible, to success. The Joseph Rowntree Foundation is organising a seminar on low demand for senior civil servants from across Whitehall, which will take place in February 2005.

 (c)   The availability of resources outside the pathfinder areas and the development of strategies to deal with weak housing markets

  27.  The pathfinder programme is intended to both tackle the most severe instances of low demand and to draw out lessons that will benefit other areas suffering from low demand. A number of non-pathfinder sub-regions have already started to work in partnership to develop strategies for tackling the particular problems they face. Many of these have received funding from their Regional Housing Boards. An example is the West Yorkshire Housing Partnership, which is developing strategic solutions to the diverse housing issues faced by West Yorkshire authorities.

  28.  In other areas, funding has been attracted from other sources. An example is the Meden Valley, a former coalfield area in the East Midlands. Here, a special purpose vehicle, Meden Valley Making Places, has been set up to tackle low demand housing in a semi-rural area. MVMP is jointly funded by English Partnerships and the East Midlands Development Agency.

  29.  However, the Government accepts that transformational change in some of the worst affected non-pathfinder areas will only be achieved with the injection of additional funding. Homes for All therefore announced that £65 million will be set aside for further sub-regions where there is a clear need for investment and the capacity to succeed. This money will be distributed through the Regional Housing Boards, although the Government expects that the main beneficiaries will include the Tees Valley, West Yorkshire and West Cumbria.

  30.  The Government expects Regional Housing Boards to continue to support sub-regions that receive this new funding with additional resources. The Government will also look to the recipient areas to attract financial and other support from other partners, including those in the private sector. Meanwhile, the Regional Housing Boards will continue to fund projects in smaller areas of low demand, for example some former coalfield areas.

  31.  The planning system enables the supply and location of housing to be controlled and is a powerful tool for use in strategies to deal with low demand. The recently reformed planning system will help by emphasising integrated spatial planning at both regional and local levels, enabling a joined up approach to economic development, transport and housing, all of which are critical to tackling low demand. It will also requiring community involvement and assessment of social, economic and environmental impacts of policies to give a greater voice to those in low demand areas.

 (d)   The dissemination of good practice, innovation and co-ordinated interventions within and outside pathfinder areas

  32.  There have been good links between pathfinders since the inception of the programme. A high level working group, with director-level representation, meets on a bi-monthly basis, while sub-groups discuss more detailed issues. ODPM has organised three pathfinder conferences, dealing with issues of particular interest to the pathfinders at the time. A fourth will take place in February 2005, focussing on the development of revised prospectuses. In addition to these events, and a number of major commercial conferences, the Audit Commission has run several seminars dealing with issues that have arisen from their scrutiny and critical friend activities.

  33.  ODPM has recently commissioned an evaluation of the pathfinder programme, which will be a major source of best practice advice. This work will provide early and regular outputs that will not only allow lessons to be shared, but will also help to shape future market renewal policy.

  34.  There is now clearly an increasing need to ensure that wider low demand areas can benefit from this exchange of experience and knowledge. Representatives of a number of non-pathfinder areas were invited to the recent launch of our home ownership solutions work. More importantly, a wide range of people involved in wider low demand work have been invited to ODPM's February pathfinder conference. As work outside the pathfinders gains momentum, ODPM will look at the need for additional seminars for sub-regional partnerships working on wider low demand.

  35.  On the wider issue of empty homes, ODPM published comprehensive guidance on Unlocking the Potential of Empty Properties in 2003. This includes numerous examples of good practice from around the country. It is also supporting the Empty Homes Agency in offering training and disseminating good practice through regional empty property practitioner fora.

 (e)   Whether Councils have sufficient powers to tackle the problem of empty homes in their areas

  36.  The Government considers that local authorities already have strong powers to deal with empty homes. These will be further enhanced once the provisions of the Housing Act 2004 are fully in force. Some examples of recent changes are described below.

EMPTY DWELLING MANAGEMENT ORDERS

  37.  The provisions in the Housing Act 2004 on Empty Dwelling Management Orders (EDMOs) stem directly from the recommendations of the Committee's report in 2002. The new powers will enable local authorities to assume management control of unoccupied dwellings where it can be demonstrated owners have no intention of bringing them back into use.

  38.  The legislation will operate alongside existing procedures for securing occupation of empty homes such as leasing arrangements operated by some local authorities and Registered Social Landlords. ODPM is working with the Empty Homes Agency to support this approach. The Government aims to commence the provisions in October 2005, following further consultation on the detail of their operation.

SELECTIVE LICENSING OF PRIVATELY RENTED ACCOMMODATION

  39.  As house prices fall and owner-occupiers find it difficult to sell their properties there is often an increase in the private rented sector. Some landlords, particularly where demand is weak, are unconcerned who they let to or how their tenants behave. This leads to an increase in anti-social behaviour, which, in turn, further exacerbates the difficulties facing these areas. It is this spiral of decline that can lead to widespread abandonment of homes and which selective licensing is designed to address.

  40.  The Housing Act 2004 contains powers for local authorities to selectively license privately rented properties in areas of low housing demand, subject to local consultation and government approval of schemes. Landlords operating in these areas will be required to have a licence—if they do not they will be committing an offence and subject to fines of up to £20,000.

  41.  Licensing will ensure that landlords are fit and proper persons and that proper arrangements for the management of their properties are in place, including requiring them to take steps to deal with anti-social behaviour by their tenants. Failure to comply with licensing conditions may result in a licence being revoked and the licence holder can be prosecuted and fined up to £5,000.

COUNCIL TAX

  42.  The Local Government Act 2003 enables local authorities to determine locally the rate of discount that applies to long-term empty homes. Local authorities can set council tax discount rates that take into account housing market conditions, particularly in areas of weak demand. New provisions allowing council tax data to be shared across local authority departments stem directly from a recommendation of the predecessor Committee's report.

COMPULSORY PURCHASE

  43.  Local authorities have long had compulsory purchase powers which can be used to acquire empty properties. In addition to their various Housing Act powers, the changes made by the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 to the wording of the compulsory purchase power in section 226(1)(a) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 to link the use of that power to the "well-being" requirement in the Local Government Act 2000 should help authorities in justifying using that power to acquire empty properties.

 (f)   The priority given to the demolition of homes and the consideration given to effective methods of refurbishment

  44.  Demolition will be a significant component of the programme but it is not the only response. Over the next two years we will be funding about 10,000 demolitions through market renewal funding, compared to around 20,000 refurbished properties. This is a relatively small part of a wider package including refurbishment, improving public space and providing the conditions for the new housing to be built.

  45.  Pathfinders should only undertake demolition only where there is clear evidence that the type of housing is not the sort that people want or where the majority of homes are unfit or not decent and the costs of improving them would be unsustainable. Where demolition is necessary, there should be full consultation with the community and every effort should be made to rehouse people in the location of their choice and with the minimum of disruption to their lives.

  46.  Nevertheless, it is important to bear in mind that much urban housing has been substituted in recent decades by housing in suburban or rural locations. At the same time, there has been no strategic approach to addressing the housing that "has been left behind". This has led to some of the problems of reduced demand in pathfinder areas.

  47.  There is a mismatch in low demand areas between the available housing stock and the number of households who are seeking accommodation. The rate of new housebuilding often exceeds any growth in households. Vacancy rates across the pathfinders are over twice the English average with higher concentrations in particular places. Refurbishment alone therefore cannot solve low demand.

  48.  Removing existing housing is a necessary part of any strategy to tackle the underlying housing market weaknesses. The careful rationalisation of some stock can also help to ensure the future long term viability of similar houses.

  49.  Typically, demolition will be focused on the worst quality housing, where maintenance to a decent standard is not economically viable for owners. However, some housing does not meet people's aspirations. It may be the wrong size or in the wrong place or the wrong type of housing. This could be older terraced accommodation, but equally it could be more modern accommodation.

  50.  Some places suffer from social problems that the current mix of housing and environment contribute to, for example by exacerbating concentrations of worklessness. Without encouraging more mixed communities by changing the provision of housing and the quality of the environment over the long-term, regeneration of these areas will be incomplete.

  51.  Our urban areas are becoming more popular and the Government strongly supports the work of the Core Cities Group. Improving the housing conditions in our cities is a key component of the urban renaissance and ensuring its continuing success. To make the most of this, transformational change is necessary.

  52.  Many of these points were articulated in the Northern Way report, which emphasised the need to accelerate the rate of housing replacement in the three Northern regions. While the Government would not necessarily subscribe to the levels of demolition proposed by the Northern Way, it accepts the underlying rationale for increased levels of replacement. The new, more flexible planning framework will help by concentrating new housing in the right places and taking into account the need for replacement housing and demolition.

 (g)   The availability of the necessary skills and training to support staff promoting projects to tackle the needs of areas with weak housing markets

  53.  The Government recognises that the availability of skills in both the public and private sectors is a risk to the delivery of market renewal. It is taking decisive action to ensure that sufficient people with the right skills are available to take forward the sustainable communities agenda.

  54.  In April 2004, the Deputy Prime Minister announced that he would be taking forward the key recommendation—to establish a new National Centre for Sustainable Communities Skills. The Government response to the rest of Sir John's recommendations was published in August 2004. Planning for a National Centre for Sustainable Communities Skills is underway.

  55.  It is likely that the National Centre will focus on improving generic skills, such as leadership, project management and others identified by Egan, in a sustainable communities context, while promoting skills development across a very wide range of occupations involved in planning, maintaining and delivering sustainable communities.

  56.  More specifically, ODPM and the Audit Commission are aiming to raise skill levels among market renewal practitioners through their programmes of seminars and learning events. Apart from the examples described in paragraph 32 above, ODPM ran a successful seminar on the better use of CPO powers in 2004.

  57.  However, the Government recognises that, even with these measures in place, it needs to keep ahead of the game and ensure that barriers due to skills shortages are avoided. To that end, ODPM will work with stakeholders to consider the particular skills required to deal with low demand and ensure that these are raised with the National Centre.

 (h)   How housing market renewal is addressed in other strategies including local and regional plans and other regeneration programmes

  58.  The alignment of regional and local strategies with pathfinder and other programmes to tackle low demand and empty homes will be vital to the success of housing market renewal. A good start has been made, but continued close working and commitment will be essential.

  59.  The need to deal with low demand housing was firmly embedded in the first Regional Housing Strategies for all regions where it is a significant issue. The Regional Housing Boards are proving to be strong partners in delivering the changes that are needed.

  60.  The planning system has a key role to play in delivering solutions to low demand. PPG3 aims to ensure that new homes are of the right type, in the right place and provided at the right time to meet housing need. As national planning policy guidance, PPG3 adopts a broad approach to ensuring sufficient housing is provided to meet the housing requirements of communities, whether this be in low or high demand areas. However, its policies are fully supportive of the low demand agenda in terms of:

    —  requiring regional planning to have regard to the particular needs and circumstances of different areas, including low demand for housing;

    —  requiring regional spatial strategies and local development frameworks to take explicit account of low demand issues;

    —  ensuring close co-operation between housing and planning professionals at both the regional and local authority levels, thereby ensuring consistent approaches are taken to low demand in relevant areas;

    —  encouraging more efficient use of land, which can make retail, transport and other public services viable in deprived areas. This will make such areas more sustainable as well as promoting social inclusion; and

    —  promoting development upon brownfield land. Much of the development potential in low demand pathfinder areas will be on brownfield sites. PPG3 sets out a sophisticated approach to the use of brownfield land in low demand areas, underpinned and informed by a good evidence base in terms of housing demand.

  61.  ODPM is currently finalising policy updates to PPG3 in the light of the responses to consultation in 2003. These changes are alive to the sensitivities of low demand areas.

  62.  Low demand is also increasingly being reflected in the emerging Regional Spatial Strategies. For example, the draft RSS for the North East includes, for the first time, indications of the numbers of homes that should be repaced for each local authority, rather than simply setting out levels of new build.

  63.  Similarly, Regional Economic strategies stress the importance of our urban areas to economic success. Senior officials in ODPM meet with their opposite numbers in the RDAs on a regular basis to discuss the ways in which RDAs can contribute to delivering sustainable communities.

  64.  Urban Regeneration Companies are working hard to co-ordinate town centre and business land improvements with wider masterplanning. Most of them are clearly aware of the need to tackle housing issues as part of their overall strategy. For example, West Lakes Renaissance, which covers West Cumbria, is taking a leading role in the work to regenerate housing markets in the area.

 (i)   How Pathfinders are seeking to involve the private sector in their long term planning and programmes

  65.  The close involvement of the private sector in pathfinders' schemes will be vital if they are to deliver effectively and efficiently. Public sector funding will prime the pump and help to boost market confidence. But, over the life of the programme, the majority of investment in pathfinder areas will come from private sector sources. The pathfinders are keenly aware of this and have all included private sector representatives on their boards, to inject different perspectives and expertise. For example, the Chair of Bridging Newcastle Gateshead is a former Chief Executive of Northern Rock.

  66.  The private sector can contribute to the success of the pathfinders' schemes in a number of ways—not least as developers, funders, lenders and providers of construction services. All of these groups need to be kept abreast of the pathfinders' proposals to ensure that they can take up the opportunities offered. The pathfinders are working on ways of making this happen. For example, each of them has a developers' forum.

  67.  Close working with private sector can also aid efficient delivery. Various pathfinders are entering into partnering arrangements with construction firms and developers through which efficient working practices can yield dividends for both parties. For example, in East Lancashire, Elevate is aiming to entering into partnership contracts to secure maximum efficiency while also helping to meet social and economic goals. Elevate is also looking to appoint lead developers that will work with the local authorities to prepare a deliverable master plan for a particular area.

  68.  The Government's decision to allow capital receipts to be retained by pathfinders has facilitated close working with the private sector. For example, they have rather more flexibility to enter into joint working arrangements and to develop innovative products to help people move to a home of their choice.

CONCLUSION

  69.  In the three years since the Committee's last report in this area, nine pathfinders have been set up and had (with one exception) schemes agreed and funded. A total of over £1.2 billion has been committed to the Market Renewal Fund, with additional resources from a range of other public and private sector sources. Local authorities have new powers to deal with empty homes. Delivery on the ground is now starting in earnest and funding is being extended to additional areas.

  70.  There is still a very long way to go to eradicate the problems associated with low demand, the aim for 2020 set in Homes for All. But the impressive performance of the pathfinders and other stakeholders to date suggests that it is an aim that can be achieved.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 8 February 2005