Select Committee on Office of the Deputy Prime Minister: Housing, Planning, Local Government and the Regions Written Evidence


Memorandum by Alcohol Concern (EVN 07)

BACKGROUND

  1.  Alcohol Concern is the national voluntary organisation working on alcohol misuse Our aims are to reduce the harm caused by alcohol misuse to individuals, families and communities and to improve services available to problem drinkers and their families.

  2.  We submitted evidence to the original ODPM Select Committee Enquiry into the Evening Economy, because of the role played by alcohol in many of the negative consequences of the late night economy, such as crime and anti-social behaviour.

  3.  Our evidence focused on a number of key issues:

    —  The contribution of the UK drinking culture to the problems associated with the evening economy.

    —  The need for a proactive approach to be taken by Local Authorities in developing the Evening Economy.

    —  Ensuring that a range of premises can flourish which caters for a wide range of clientele rather than the predominance of stand up venues catering for a youth market alone.

    —  Improving the capacity of public services to cope with a 24 hour economy.

    —  The need for a strategic and co-ordinated approach to be taken to policy development in this area.

  4.  Since the publication of the original report there have been a number of policy developments.

PUBLICATION OF THE NATIONAL ALCOHOL HARM REDUCTION STRATEGY

  5.  Although recognising the problems associated with the Evening Economy, The arrival of the National Alcohol Harm Reduction Strategy in 2004 recommended little in the way of solutions. The approach taken was very much around tackling the crime and disorder rather than preventing problems from arising and the report concluded that the enforcement powers needed were largely already in existence.

  6.  Our concern has been that this does not provide a basis on which to move forwards on this issue. There was little exploration of the reasons why enforcement does not take place, nor was there any incentives given to change the culture of policing of offences related with drunkenness. This is of concern given that between 1994 and 2002, there was an average of only 264 prosecutions for underage sales in any licensed premises in England and Wales, including pubs and clubs prosecutions and only 120 prosecutions for since 1994 for "allowing drunken and riotous behaviour" on licensed premises[3].

GOVERNMENT PROPOSALS ON "DRINKING RESPONSIBLY"

  7.  In response to concerns over the impact of licensing changes on crime and disorder, the Home Office, DCMS and ODPM, released a joint consultation document looking at proposals to tackle alcohol related disorder. The document suggested the introduction of a number of measures including "Alcohol Disorder Zones" to tackle areas where problems are in evidence. These proposals, once again are reactive rather than proactive solutions to alcohol related disorder and whilst the benefits of a focused multi agency approach to these problems can be effective, we would suggest that it would be more effective and less bureaucratic to deal with prevention of alcohol related disorder in the first instance.

  8.  One welcome step forwards with the concept of the new Zones is that it acknowledges Licensees must be accountable for the impact their business can have on local communities. Under the current licensing legislation, little progress has been made on licensees accepting they have any responsibility for events which occur outside their premises. These Zones will help to build this sort of accountability and will benefit local communities.

  9.  There has been little detail given on how the new Alcohol Disorder Zones will fit into other functions within Local Authorities. We believe strongly that they should link into the planning system and licensing systems as a whole, as it would be incoherent for an area to be designated an ADZ whilst giving permission for new bars and pubs to be opened or current ones opened for longer.

CONCLUSION

  10.  We were delighted that the Select Committee Report recommended that local authorities needed to put together an action plan to guide the development of the evening economy and were disappointed that this recommendation was not taken up by central Government.

  11.  Even the considerable media, political and public interest in the impact of licensing laws on the problems in our Town and city centres, which led to the publication of "Drinking Responsibly" has done little to inspire the Government to take a proactive stance to the development of the Evening Economy. The central flaw in the legislation and policy approach remains therefore that responsible authorities are left to react to rather than prevent the problem from arising.

  12.  Alcohol Concern has been vocal in it's criticism of the restrictive approach the Licensing Act takes to the ability of Local Authorities to develop the night time economy. We believe that guidance issued on implementing the Licensing Act should be amended to give local authorities the powers to enforce licensing policies without the need for representation from other partners and to include proactive measures such as banning of irresponsible promotions as part of license conditions.





3   Hansard House of Commons Written Answers for 10 January 2005, Column 266W. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 7 April 2005