Select Committee on Office of the Deputy Prime Minister: Housing, Planning, Local Government and the Regions Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 40-43)

6 DECEMBER 2004

MS CLAER LLOYD-JONES, MR GORDON MUSSETT AND MR MIRZA AHMAD

  Q40 Chairman: Could I wind up by asking you about your feelings about the link between the Code of Conduct, if there should be a link, and the assessment of a local authority's accountability through the Comprehensive Performance Assessment.

  Mr Ahmad: Certainly I have seen some changes to the Comprehensive Performance Assessment, the key lines of inquiry by the Audit Commission. I have seen those. Claer and I have certainly commented on those from the Association of Council Secretaries and Solicitors. I think it has to come. There is no question about it. If the local authority is serious about improving performance, improving services, making sure citizens are looked after appropriately in terms of what they have elected them to do, then ethical framework is the mechanism by which it is delivered by those who are in decision-making power

  Ms Lloyd-Jones: It is an issue that Hackney standards committee has explored in conjunction with the partnership organisations, through the Raising Standards Conference agenda—and, again, I will leave a copy of this for you. The chief executive of the Audit Commission came to speak as well as the chief executive of the Standards Board for England. The theme is that high standards of behaviour by both councillors and officers leads to better service delivery. We therefore entirely see the connection and the way the CPA is going. I think the Use of Resources Service Block—which currently measures quite technical things like: Is there a code of conduct? Is everyone signed up to it?—does not go far enough, so I certainly welcome the development from the Audit Commission in looking at the relationship between service delivery and behaviour and we completely agree that that is the way that councils will improve service delivery, and therefore their CPA score, by having a robust ethical framework across their areas, not just across their services.

  Q41 Andrew Bennett: Is this not an element of local authorities having to do more and more training and meet higher and higher ethical standards but having less and less power to do anything worthwhile for their communities.

  Ms Lloyd-Jones: I do not think that is right if you look at the influence which goes through strategic partnerships. Indeed, part of the Raising Standards agenda that we had in Hackney was that we had a number of our partners there, health partners, the police, the voluntary sector partners, housing associations and so on, and our standards committee at the moment is being asked to extend its jurisdiction, if you like, through the voluntary sector compact and the housing compact with housing associations, so we are looking at a single ethical platform, set of standards, code of conduct across the piece. Local authorities using their influence in this way is very much welcomed actually by our partners because the independent members of our standards committee do have experience in local adjudications and there is, therefore, belief that this is a legitimate role for the local authority.

  Q42 Mr Betts: Does that cover the private sector members of local strategic partnerships?

  Ms Lloyd-Jones: Yes, indeed.

  Q43 Chairman: On that note, could I thank you very much.

  Ms Lloyd-Jones: Could I leave these packs for you?

  Chairman: Thank you.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 6 April 2005