Select Committee on Office of the Deputy Prime Minister: Housing, Planning, Local Government and the Regions Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 340-354)

PAUL GOGGINS MP AND MR IVOR CAPLIN MP

14 DECEMBER 2004

  Q340 Chairman: Come on, what is the early stages? Have you let the contract?

  Mr Caplin: Yes, to King's College, I just said, Chairman. King's College London are doing the work for us.

  Q341 Chairman: So when do you expect to have the results from that?

  Mr Caplin: During the early part of next year.

  Q342 Christine Russell: Are there any early indications you can share with us?

  Mr Caplin: Not today, no.

  Q343 Christine Russell: On a question my colleague over there asked about ex-prisoners, do you find there are any regional variations as to the level of homelessness and the problems faced by ex military men and women?

  Mr Caplin: Obviously we have large areas of the military population in certain parts of the country. It will be no surprise to the Committee to hear that—in Plymouth, in Portsmouth, in Aldershot, in Colchester, in Catterick, in Rosyth in Scotland—it is likely that some of the regional hot spots will be around those areas. I think (and we hope) that the research will look at this in detail. One of the things that we do foresee is that the problem is likely to be with smaller numbers of people in different areas, so, for instance, instead of the actual homelessness issue being around Catterick in Yorkshire it might well be in Manchester because people tend to drift back to maybe where they once lived. That is part of what I hope the research will develop for us and show us the real issues that we face in terms of homelessness.

  Q344 Mr Cummings: The Committee came across the problems of the National Asylum Support Service's allocations in their report on social cohesion. Can you tell the Committee what has been done to plan NASS allocations so that housing authorities are not too over-burdened and communities become unbalanced?

  Paul Goggins: I will take this one, Chairman, although I should point out of course that Des Browne my colleague Minister in the Home Office is principally responsible for asylum and immigration.

  Q345 Chairman: Yes but there is limit to the number of Ministers we wanted to call today!

  Paul Goggins: I just say that in case you want a little more detail in terms of the answers. Certainly as we are developing the National Refugee Integration Statutory, and indeed as we are seeking to renegotiate some of the contracts now that NASS have with housing providers, we certainly see the reduction of homelessness and prevention of homelessness as being absolutely critical features here and it is certainly something that we intend to deliver as we move forward.

  Q346 Mr Cummings: Are you giving clear guidance to NASS on developing relationships with local authorities and other service providers?

  Paul Goggins: As I say, NASS are renegotiating contracts in 2005 with housing providers and certainly we are giving them very clear advice that we expect the prevention or the reduction of homelessness as being essential.

  Q347 Mr Cummings: Are they taking that advice?

  Paul Goggins: They certainly will take that advice. Let me give you a practical example where somebody has been dispersed into the system and is living at a particular address and they have their asylum application dealt with and they are given refugee status, it is important that they are able to continue to live in that accommodation beyond the positive decision. You do not want to move somebody out suddenly because they have had a positive decision because if you did that it could destabilise their—

  Q348 Chairman: Can you guarantee that they are able to live there?

  Paul Goggins: To my knowledge there are no particular guarantees but we certainly want to see them being able to stay there for a while until they move on to permanent accommodation. We certainly do not want to see disruption at the time of a positive decision and that is one of the features we will looking to develop as we look at the contracts that NASS has with housing providers.

  Q349 Mr Cummings: Are you satisfied that NASS are dealing with this situation in the homeless sector quite seriously?

  Paul Goggins: There have clearly been difficulties over the last few years in this area but we are seeking to deal with them and the renegotiation of contracts next year provides an opportunity to get this better, to get this more effective.

  Mr Cummings: Do I detect some doubts at the efficiency of NASS in your remarks, Minister?

  Chairman: We cannot get a smile on the record very easily!

  Q350 Mr Cummings: If so, are you going to give them any firmer guidelines?

  Paul Goggins: I am sure that my colleague will be giving them very clear guidelines indeed as they renegotiate their contracts. Yes, there have been difficulties and we do not hide that and, yes, we have got to make sure that the contracts that NASS have are as efficient as possible, but we have also got to ensure, if we are going to prevent homelessness and if we are going to create stable communities and populations—and I evidence that with the example I gave—that there is the opportunity to stay in accommodation beyond the positive decision. That is certainly very important—to make sure that we get an alignment between the level of need of individuals who are within the dispersal system and the surrounding communities. I think getting that right is going to be a very important feature of the NASS contracts as they are renegotiated.

  Q351 Mr Cummings: How serious are the problems arising from the new EU accession states and the pressures that they are adding to the housing situation?

  Paul Goggins: It is a very interesting question. If I can tell you that in terms of new lettings for those coming from the accession countries between May and September, the sum total of new lets was 14, and so I do not think we are being overwhelmed in terms of new accommodation requirements for people coming in. Of course if people's right to be here is conditional on them being self-sufficient then they do not have an automatic right to housing or housing support but where they are here legitimately and are working and making a contribution obviously they begin to accumulate rights.

  Q352 Mr Betts: I am in discussion with Des Browne about one of the biggest problems in my constituency which is people who are failed asylum seekers who will not accept hard case support because they do not want to move to another area and who often end up sleeping sometimes 10 to a house in the homes of people who have got continued NASS support because they are claiming asylum or have been successful in that claim and that causes major problems of social disruption in communities. Is that an issue which the department has flagged up as a problem that it has got to deal with?

  Paul Goggins: It is an issue and of course what it requires is a speedier system for making decisions and then a determination that people must be removed if they fail. The problem has been that too often the decision-making process has taken too long, people become well established and then after a negative decision is taken, there is an issue about how they and their families can be removed. We are certainly seeking to develop initiatives first of all to make the decisions quicker but also to remove people where they have failed their asylum application.

  Q353 Mr Betts: Even to allow them to stay within that community until you remove them rather than hard case support and insisting they move to another area, which is a big problem?

  Paul Goggins: It certainly needs to be a done in a fair and humane way but it must be done and done in a determined way. We cannot allow delay to create further uncertainty in the lives of these individuals and the communities around them. We are certainly seeking to work with local authorities to try to deal with these issues. In the end where people have failed and they have no further legitimate right to be here or to claim support then they will be removed.

  Q354 Chairman: Mr Caplin, you have talked about the people who are leaving the forces and you also talked about the people who have left and have continuing needs. What about the people who are actually in the forces? Young people at 18 or 19 if they go off to college suddenly find they have got to sort accommodation out for themselves and they grow up pretty quickly. Even if they stay at home and work there is a tendency for parents to try and ease them out as soon as reasonable and they learn then about the housing market. For a lot of people who are in the services, particularly people who stay in for a long time, they often have very little idea about what the housing market is and the realistic problems. Are you doing anything to try and make sure that people in the services actually know the realities of life outside?

  Mr Caplin: We have something called the Joint Services Housing Advice Office and its role within the military chain of command is, as I was explaining earlier, instead of just dealing with people at the end of their military careers, at the end of 22 years which might be, say, at age 38 if they joined at 16, to deal with them on a more regular basis so that we understand their needs and their aspirations. It is true to say that particularly in the Army it is much more single today than it was in the past. About 60% of the British Army is single and that places different pressures on us in terms of single living accommodation and the need to make sure that we guide those people through those years in the Army properly and effectively so that when they become veterans they have the right advice and are able, if they want to, to have the advice they need to go into the proper housing market. We will continue that by way of encouragement both to single people and to families within the Army, as I was explaining earlier, because we do not have properties ourselves.

  Chairman: On that note, can I thank you both very much for your evidence.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 27 January 2005