Select Committee on Office of the Deputy Prime Minister: Housing, Planning, Local Government and the Regions Written Evidence


APPENDIX 1

DETAILED ASSUMPTIONS IN ESTIMATING PUBLIC EXPENDITURE IMPACT OF LAWN MOVES

  The potential saving from a LAWN moves depends on the cost of the temporary accommodation. This in turn varies according to the size of the accommodation. So the bedroom profile of LAWN moves is important. From the LAWN statistics for Q1 2003-04 they are 40% for one bedroom, 35% for two bedroom and 25% for three+ bed. The weighted average cost of temporary accommodation for this profile was £225 per week at end 2002. These figures will inevitably change over time. They are unlikely to fall significantly.

  The extent to which the numbers in temporary accommodation would go down for each LAWN move needs to be defined and done so for each bedroom category size to be realistic. Hence it is assumed that 60% of one bedroom moves would result a drop in the numbers in temporary accommodation, 80% of two bedroom moves and 90% of three+ bedroom moves. This does not assume that the LAWN movers are homeless persons, but it relies on the fact that any social tenant moved by LAWN will free up a council or RSL dwelling for use by another applicant. In London the bulk of new applicants rehoused are the homeless.

  Assuming that only a proportion of moves result in a reduction in temporary accommodation reduces the averaged weighting saving to about £175 per week.

  The great bulk of this cost is met by central Government, through housing benefit (HB) and most of the remainder by local authorities.

  Relatively few persons are working at the time of their homelessness and it is assumed that if placed in temporary accommodation whose rents are £200+ per week the depth of their poverty trap would mean that relatively few such homeless persons would find a job.

  However with rents of the order of £50 per week for council housing on average outside London, the East and South East it is reasonable to assume that within a reasonably short period of time a proportion of the movers would start to gain employment. We assume that 10% of the population gain employment a year after a LAWN move, 20% after two years up to a maximum of 30% reached after three years. This reduces the HB cost to Government. It is also assumed that LAWN movers will, if in employment, stop renting their home after 10 years. So the HB savings would cease at that point.

  The incentives assumed are:

    —  £4,000 dowry to the receiving landlord.

    —  £500 incentive to the LAWN service provider.

  The discount rate assumed for the Present Value calculation is 5%. The savings would be even greater if the Treasury's revised base discount rate of 3.5% was assumed.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 27 January 2005