Select Committee on Office of the Deputy Prime Minister: Housing, Planning, Local Government and the Regions Memoranda


Supplementary Memorandum by the Association of Colleges (AoC) (DRA 47(a))

During the summer the Association of Colleges submitted written evidence as part of the Committee's inquiry into the Draft Regional Assemblies Bill. After further consultation with our members we would like to make further comments (below). I hope the Committee will be able to consider these as part of your inquiry.

We have the following comments on specific clauses of the Draft Bill:

Clause 43

The AoC agrees that the general purposes of a regional assembly

Clause 44

The AoC welcomes the restriction in clause 44 (5) on the power of the Assembly to do anything for a commercial purpose. While we support the role of regional assemblies as strategic bodies in areas where there is public support for them, we believe that operations are best carried out by other organisations to maintain a clear distinction between policy and delivery. The experience of Training and Enterprise Councils in the early 1990s was that the lack of such a distinction resulted in some TECs creating trading businesses in the training area which were given a favoured position in contracts in a way that detracted from their ability to plan strategically.

Clause 45

The AoC understands the need for the regional assemblies bill to create enabling powers for the Secretary of State to add functions as time passes by secondary legislation to expedite changes but we are concerned that this power could be used to add education and training powers without full consideration of the impact. The purposes and powers of assemblies set out in clause 43 create the potential for a large expansion of the remit of assemblies to cover many of the functions currently delegated to the Learning and Skills Council in the Learning and Skills Act 2000. Clause 45 appears to make it possible for the Secretary of State to transfer various functions in adult learning and skills to regional assembles statutory instrument. This is not, of itself undesirable but consideration would need to be given to the following issues:

·  the impact that such a transfer would have on other Learning and Skills Council functions in the same region, for example their duties and responsibilities with respect to the education and training of 16 to 19 year olds.

·  the impact that such a transfer would have on adult learning and skills in other regions. A particular issue would be the impact on colleges in neighbouring regions where people travel across boundaries but also where colleges are dealing with national companies or national specialities. The transfer of functions to a regional assembly could make funding and planning arrangements more complicated and less effective.

·  the transfer issues in terms of budgets, assets and liabilities which could complicate such a transfer, particularly if a transfer took place at a different time from the end of the LSC financial year (31st March) or the end of the college financial year (31st July). A transfer which was financially favourable to the regional assembly obtaining more functions would disadvantage other regions.

·  future arrangements to ensure that adult learning and skills are planned in a coherent and consistent way across England.

In the view of AoC it is not sufficient for these matters to be actioned simply through the mechanism of a statutory instrument. We believe an extensive process of examination of the implications would be essential, including full consultation with the learning and skills sector, with implementation through primary legislation.

Clause 46

The AoC have the same comments about additional duties that the bill creates as about additional functions

Clause 119

AoC believes it will be desirable for any changes to the appointment process to be determined only after the investigations and consultation described above. Were the regional assemblies to be given a role in the appointment of local LSC board members in place of the Secretary of State, we believe that the Secretary of State's guidance should set clear limits on the categories of appointment to ensure that local LSCs had appropriate knowledge in areas which fall outside the assembly remit, for example 14-19 education, and to maintain consistency of approach across the country as a whole.

Clause 120

The AoC supports this clause

Clause 121

The AoC supports this clause

Dr John Brennan

Chief Executive





 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 7 February 2005